HT: Mike Blessing
Truly Magnificent...these are the men freedom grows.
http://www.allproudamericans.com/most-heavily-decorated-veteran-of-the-moder-era.html
WARCHICK is a military historian/conservative commentator. She is a frequent guest on multiple talk-radio shows and is author of the forthcoming "Forgotten Warrior" series. She coined the phrases "Political Castration"--nothing correct about it--and ISLAMMUNISM--the secret combination of Islam/Communism. She sounds the war cry on North Korea and its unholy alliance with terrorism. She has a degree in Education but stands firm against the NEA. WARCHICK has been an online favorite since 2002.
Tuesday, August 31, 2010
Monday, August 30, 2010
SHIA TAQIYYA--Freedom from Shari-dum
By: Resa LaRu Kirkland
Qur'an (3:54) - "…Allah schemed (against them): and Allah is the best of schemers."
Those who read my writings know that I have long called the enemy we are facing today “Islammunism,” which is the coming together of the most wicked of freedom’s enemies: Islam and communism. Look at Islamic nations and their allies—can you say Hitler/Stalin-type non-aggression pact?
And like Hitler and Stalin, no evil, no horror, no hellish tactic is beneath them. In fact, it’s commanded; it’s taqiyya: the right of Muslims to lie and deceive in the advancement of allah.
So should photo lies really be a shocker anymore? We’ve been down this road before…remember the Muslim photographer from Reuters? It’s still happening, yet Reuters is still around, still treated like a legitimate news source. To the Islammunist world, that’s the stamp of approval. Why quit when they’re getting exactly what they want?
So when Scott Winchell of StandUpAmericaUS.com asked me to look into this picture, I knew it wasn’t to find Waldo.
The pic was at Shia News with a date listed as August 23, 2010. The only information provided was this title American Soldiers disgraced Masjid in Iraq. As usual, it was being presented at a time when our troops were “pulling out,” so the world was focused on Iraq, and even though the pic originally surfaced in November, 2004, during the second battle for Fallujah, it is presented in such a manner that you would think it is recent.
That’s taqiyya; no lie too appalling, no deception too unconscionable.
A quick search proved that the pic appeared first and primarily at Muslim, communist, or anti-American sites. That really should be enough to discredit it. After all, rampant Islammunist photo-doctoring is so prolific that we should designate a wing of each hospital to it.
But just a two-day scratch of the surface of the pic revealed some interesting abnormalities. Now I’m no big-city fancy-schmancy graphic-ee photographer, but fortunately I worked with a graphic artist who is all that, and by looking at the picture through his Adobe CS5 program, we noticed a few things. NOTE: this picture pixilated very quickly, making it particularly difficult to evaluate.
Right off the bat the pic looks to me like soldiers preparing to head out in a convoy. They’re in full gear, resting and waiting, not dirty, muddy, sweating, torn up. They don’t look like guys who just fought a battle to secure the mosque (which Islammunists are notorious for using as strongholds, weapon caches, and torture rooms). These men were clearly preparing to go somewhere, not relaxing after a battle.
Then there’s what appears to be a giant erase mark in the middle of the elaborate carpet (see green arrow). The edges are not sharp, but fuzzy and scribbled. This cannot be attributed to glare from the many windows, as window light has distinct edges to it. This looks more like something was there but has been sloppily erased. So what was there?
Another glaring mistake is the missing insignia pointed out by the red arrows. Our non special ops warriors wear insignia…always. When magnified there is clearly a pixilated box on the arms of these men, where their insignia should go. And where are the shadows? There are few, if any, and often in different directions all throughout the pic.
Check out the aqua arrows. The ones pointing to the man on the left indicate a flat spot on his head, a possible photoshopped line, and a poor one at that. The straight edge of his leg, the awkward stance of the crossed leg seem to indicate he is leaning against something, yet there is only empty space behind him in the picture. The other aqua arrow, pointing to the feet of the man just right of center, show a perfectly straight line on the bottom of the foot. How many feet make a perfectly straight line, even in shoes?
The yellow arrows pointing to the men along the back wall shows a weird depth perception. They look too far away, yet their distance from the men sitting in the front middle is only about 30 feet, tops. Their head size seems to make them appear much further away.
And finally, the dark blue arrow. While there is indeed a great deal of light flooding the mosque from its many windows, close inspection of this man’s face and left arm clearly indicate an outdoor shot, in full, glaring sunlight. Look at all the other men nearby, in the same mosque. Not a single other man, even those nearby, show such bright light on them, even though there is bright light all over.
Get where I’m going?
For the hippy headed, here it is: this photo is suspicious at best, and I believe it is either a mosque with soldiers photoshopped in or a group standing around in an outdoor setting, readying to leave on a convoy, with a mosque photoshopped around them. Does it really matter which one it is? Taqiyya is taqiyya is taqiyya, and it is being used every day in every way, and must be called out, every time.
We are freedom, not shari-dum. Cry foul, stand your ground, and never, ever, ever submit. It is the one thing lies and deception cannot bear: truth, and the courage to back it.
Keep the faith, bros, in all things courage, and no substitute for VICTORY.
***UPDATE***
From SPUD, overseas Air Force man:
More obvious; the uniforms are wrong for August 2010. For the Army anyway; we were wearing the Green FRACU's not the brown uniforms used earlier in the campaign. The body armor is wrong too it's the older heavier style and if it were guys waiting for a convoy then they wouldn't be wearing knee pads. The Marines wear the brown uniform with no patches but by August 2010 they were completely out of Iraq.
Who took the picture? How did it get in the hands of the claimants? If the claim is that the picture was taken in 2010 then it's a fake and wrong based on my previous comments. If it's a 2004 pic it's possible that it might be real. However, there are still some anomalies that you have pointed out. If it's a 2004 pic the army did wear the brown uniforms but they also wore their patches (SF Soldiers sanitize their uniforms of patches etc. but these guys are not SF). You would have to get a picture of the whole building to see if that line in the middle was a skylight through the ceiling, it could also be a narrow window with the sun shining through it. More likely than not they are Army personnel because the Marines wear brown body armor, they don't carry black backpacks and the haircuts are wrong for Marines. The black backpacks are an indicator that they may have been using the building as a resting place but I don't see any bedding. I would have liked to see the outside of the building. I find it strange that they have their helmets off, that indicates it's a secure area not some random mosque in Fallujah at the height of the assault. Guys on a convoy stop wouldn't bring in their backpacks they would leave them in the vehicles. In 2004 General Order 1 was in effect and these guys would not have been in a mosque unless it was authorized or after a firefight with insurgents firing from a mosque in which case I would say I doubt they went blasting at those guys with their black backpacks on.
They can twist it any way they want; they'll always find something to harp on but it's always convenient to leave out the fact that muslim secret police can arrest you in the middle of the night or some knuckleheads with an AK-47 can burst into your house, claim you're a this or that and then cut your head off. Oh yea and by the way it's OK for them to shoot AT people from a holy mosque (or just plain old blow it up with a suicide bomber) but it's an infidel's sin to shoot back or blow it up or enter it to keep people from getting killed.
Qur'an (3:54) - "…Allah schemed (against them): and Allah is the best of schemers."
Those who read my writings know that I have long called the enemy we are facing today “Islammunism,” which is the coming together of the most wicked of freedom’s enemies: Islam and communism. Look at Islamic nations and their allies—can you say Hitler/Stalin-type non-aggression pact?
And like Hitler and Stalin, no evil, no horror, no hellish tactic is beneath them. In fact, it’s commanded; it’s taqiyya: the right of Muslims to lie and deceive in the advancement of allah.
So should photo lies really be a shocker anymore? We’ve been down this road before…remember the Muslim photographer from Reuters? It’s still happening, yet Reuters is still around, still treated like a legitimate news source. To the Islammunist world, that’s the stamp of approval. Why quit when they’re getting exactly what they want?
So when Scott Winchell of StandUpAmericaUS.com asked me to look into this picture, I knew it wasn’t to find Waldo.
The pic was at Shia News with a date listed as August 23, 2010. The only information provided was this title American Soldiers disgraced Masjid in Iraq. As usual, it was being presented at a time when our troops were “pulling out,” so the world was focused on Iraq, and even though the pic originally surfaced in November, 2004, during the second battle for Fallujah, it is presented in such a manner that you would think it is recent.
That’s taqiyya; no lie too appalling, no deception too unconscionable.
A quick search proved that the pic appeared first and primarily at Muslim, communist, or anti-American sites. That really should be enough to discredit it. After all, rampant Islammunist photo-doctoring is so prolific that we should designate a wing of each hospital to it.
But just a two-day scratch of the surface of the pic revealed some interesting abnormalities. Now I’m no big-city fancy-schmancy graphic-ee photographer, but fortunately I worked with a graphic artist who is all that, and by looking at the picture through his Adobe CS5 program, we noticed a few things. NOTE: this picture pixilated very quickly, making it particularly difficult to evaluate.
Right off the bat the pic looks to me like soldiers preparing to head out in a convoy. They’re in full gear, resting and waiting, not dirty, muddy, sweating, torn up. They don’t look like guys who just fought a battle to secure the mosque (which Islammunists are notorious for using as strongholds, weapon caches, and torture rooms). These men were clearly preparing to go somewhere, not relaxing after a battle.
Then there’s what appears to be a giant erase mark in the middle of the elaborate carpet (see green arrow). The edges are not sharp, but fuzzy and scribbled. This cannot be attributed to glare from the many windows, as window light has distinct edges to it. This looks more like something was there but has been sloppily erased. So what was there?
Another glaring mistake is the missing insignia pointed out by the red arrows. Our non special ops warriors wear insignia…always. When magnified there is clearly a pixilated box on the arms of these men, where their insignia should go. And where are the shadows? There are few, if any, and often in different directions all throughout the pic.
Check out the aqua arrows. The ones pointing to the man on the left indicate a flat spot on his head, a possible photoshopped line, and a poor one at that. The straight edge of his leg, the awkward stance of the crossed leg seem to indicate he is leaning against something, yet there is only empty space behind him in the picture. The other aqua arrow, pointing to the feet of the man just right of center, show a perfectly straight line on the bottom of the foot. How many feet make a perfectly straight line, even in shoes?
The yellow arrows pointing to the men along the back wall shows a weird depth perception. They look too far away, yet their distance from the men sitting in the front middle is only about 30 feet, tops. Their head size seems to make them appear much further away.
And finally, the dark blue arrow. While there is indeed a great deal of light flooding the mosque from its many windows, close inspection of this man’s face and left arm clearly indicate an outdoor shot, in full, glaring sunlight. Look at all the other men nearby, in the same mosque. Not a single other man, even those nearby, show such bright light on them, even though there is bright light all over.
Get where I’m going?
For the hippy headed, here it is: this photo is suspicious at best, and I believe it is either a mosque with soldiers photoshopped in or a group standing around in an outdoor setting, readying to leave on a convoy, with a mosque photoshopped around them. Does it really matter which one it is? Taqiyya is taqiyya is taqiyya, and it is being used every day in every way, and must be called out, every time.
We are freedom, not shari-dum. Cry foul, stand your ground, and never, ever, ever submit. It is the one thing lies and deception cannot bear: truth, and the courage to back it.
Keep the faith, bros, in all things courage, and no substitute for VICTORY.
***UPDATE***
From SPUD, overseas Air Force man:
More obvious; the uniforms are wrong for August 2010. For the Army anyway; we were wearing the Green FRACU's not the brown uniforms used earlier in the campaign. The body armor is wrong too it's the older heavier style and if it were guys waiting for a convoy then they wouldn't be wearing knee pads. The Marines wear the brown uniform with no patches but by August 2010 they were completely out of Iraq.
Who took the picture? How did it get in the hands of the claimants? If the claim is that the picture was taken in 2010 then it's a fake and wrong based on my previous comments. If it's a 2004 pic it's possible that it might be real. However, there are still some anomalies that you have pointed out. If it's a 2004 pic the army did wear the brown uniforms but they also wore their patches (SF Soldiers sanitize their uniforms of patches etc. but these guys are not SF). You would have to get a picture of the whole building to see if that line in the middle was a skylight through the ceiling, it could also be a narrow window with the sun shining through it. More likely than not they are Army personnel because the Marines wear brown body armor, they don't carry black backpacks and the haircuts are wrong for Marines. The black backpacks are an indicator that they may have been using the building as a resting place but I don't see any bedding. I would have liked to see the outside of the building. I find it strange that they have their helmets off, that indicates it's a secure area not some random mosque in Fallujah at the height of the assault. Guys on a convoy stop wouldn't bring in their backpacks they would leave them in the vehicles. In 2004 General Order 1 was in effect and these guys would not have been in a mosque unless it was authorized or after a firefight with insurgents firing from a mosque in which case I would say I doubt they went blasting at those guys with their black backpacks on.
They can twist it any way they want; they'll always find something to harp on but it's always convenient to leave out the fact that muslim secret police can arrest you in the middle of the night or some knuckleheads with an AK-47 can burst into your house, claim you're a this or that and then cut your head off. Oh yea and by the way it's OK for them to shoot AT people from a holy mosque (or just plain old blow it up with a suicide bomber) but it's an infidel's sin to shoot back or blow it up or enter it to keep people from getting killed.
Restoring Honor, Glenn Beck, God, and New Jerusalem.
No television journalist in the history of America has ever taught nightly lessons in Gospel Doctrine.
Wednesday, August 11, 2010
Sunday, August 08, 2010
HIPPY HEADED: Chicks Have Left Thinking for Left Thinking
By: Resa LaRu Kirkland
My anti-femmie articles have always been my most popular. I have gotten emails from people all over the United States, Canada, Australia, India, Europe, and a few letters that may possibly be from other planets.
And no, I don’t mean that because the people who were writing them were wrong in their outrage. I mean because the behavior and beliefs they describe are so completely out of this world.
That’s feminism for you…ugly aliens and constantly a pain in the butt (anal probe joke).
It started with this sweet letter from a young woman (I’ll call her “S”), who had more courage at 20 than I have at 44:
I received an A on the paper I wrote on your article, "Women Should Reject Feminism."
I am just getting my feet wet in school, and liberal politics run rampant in my classrooms. I have to do quite a bit of dissecting and analyzing, not to get caught up in "their" BS.
I have been reading some of your "stuff"; I am very impressed with your strong, unforgiving viewpoints. You are very inspirational to me. Thanks.
~ S
Needless to say, I was overwhelmed that something I wrote had affected this young woman so profoundly, and I feel uncomfortable saying that out loud. Truth is what it is, and the credit goes there. I’m consistently stunned that people are consistently stunned by stating the truth out loud, as if we’re all in on some agreement not to do so in the name of politeness. Apparently we have forgotten that our obligation is to truth, not “feewings.” And here’s the evidence.
After responding to S, she shared with me a raging debate going on between her and a friend who had the same hippy views she was running into in the ironically named halls of “higher education.” Remarkably, and predictably, her friend is more educated than S is, yet far less capable of a rational thought or cogent response.
And it began with a woman who rejected an education system overrun with communism and started thinking and studying for herself. It is clear as she explains herself and the debate with her “friend” that one of them follows the textbook behavior of evil: distract, divert, evade, deny, lie, ad hominem, and wear them out without ever actually addressing the subject at hand.
Anything but the truth. By their fruits…
In her own words, they are NOT in need of any editing other than names for privacy’s sake and personal commentary. What you are about to read about S makes the debate that follows, between her and her “educated” friend, even more remarkable…and inspiring (my commentary in red):
Warchick,
F*****g A right you have permission! I am tickled to death!!! =D
Speaking to her is utterly exhausting! Talking to her on everything from immigration to supporting our soldiers is mind numbing! Over Memorial Day weekend, she made comments about our girls and boys in uniform that turned my stomach and literally made me want to be sick! She is so lost and confused and it’s not even that her viewpoints, opposing my own, that bothers me, it is her complete lack of knowledge and the fact that she is ignorant of how to discuss anything in a clear, concise, logical manner. If she at least possessed some better argumentation skills, I could respect her opinion. She spews emotion after reaction after emotion. No logic. No freaking brain. Not like I have to tell you… I believe the conversation is now over so I will send it to you. Do your worst! (Best) =) (She stated this so concisely and accurately that my commentary is unnecessary.)
It ended with her realizing that she held no quarter to…my logic. Alas, she can see *some* light and now I remember why I bother with this sweet, uninformed girl. The saddest part about the whole thing is she is far more educated than I. I am not ashamed to say (due to excruciating family circumstances) I am a ninth grade dropout! She has an associate in psychology, and on her way to a bachelor. It is so scary to me; even the most educated people of this country are some of the most ignorant. Her degree, I think she feels, gives her the right to be an idiot! What does your education mean to you?! Scary! I just finished my first two college classes, with good grades. =) I haven’t been to school in more than eight years. “Diamond in the rough.” =)…
I was scared to show you the conversation, because of possible legal backlash. (My friend defaming your name or using threatening language) I should have known better! You are a real person, and you are intelligent enough to know political correctness is for people with idle minds. =)
I was also very surprised you took an interest in me at all or even replied to me at all. It took me a while to think over and realize why you even took the time to respond to my messages. I realize now that people like my friend are as disgusted by you, as we are them. (Left vs. Right) I also realize you need (well not exactly) people like me to encourage you. You are completely “Right” (pun intended) and out on a limb (and our numbers are not as strong as they should be) anything I can say or do to encourage you in your work is an honor. =)
~S
P.S. You can leave the bit out about me being an eighth grade drop-out, in your article. Like I said; I am not ashamed, I feel it may disparage your own point. (Dark past, extremely bright future) =)
Look at her reasoning, her perception, her decency, in the above and below, and contrast that with her friend’s convoluted logic and behavior below. You want to know the difference between the left and right? Read! It’s long, tough to get through, and as S said, exhausting. But it’s too important to shorten, and the perfect commentary on the idiocy of feminism and all leftist thinking. (Lightly edited for language, but not spelling, grammar, or logic…obviously).
FRIEND: I tried to send this as a message, but something is glitching, so i have to post it here. if it makes you mad, feel welcome to delete it w/out hurting my feewings. not that you really probably care about that. k? k.
i think it is soo ignorant (meaning lack of information or knowledge on subject) of you to be anti-femini...st, thats just f*****g stupid. So you dont think we have the right to be paid fairly, to vote, to divorce our husbands, to not wear dresses every f****n day, to question the men in our lives, to hold jobs besides teachers, nurses, secretaries and nannies????? Feminists and feminists alone brought about all the changes that brought these sort of rights to us. (Exactly how many women were in power? Oh right, those were majority old white European males who enacted laws on vote, land ownership, etc. But in femmie-speak, women did it because…well, I guess ‘cause they say so.)
S: No love-love you don't know my views we've never discussed this one I absolutely want everythin you mention above, we will talk...Haha friend you funny you think I'm so ignorant, you broke down ignorant for me... =D (Ooooooh! That’s gonna leave a mark!)
FRIEND: you might be right about modern feminism, but with everything i know about feminism in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, you're just wrong. (What does that have to do with the 21st Century?) There is nothing unequal and fascist about women wanting to vote, or having the right to disagree with their husbands or divorce them, or work in whatever field they aspire to work in and... be paid equally, which were all goals of feminism. (Which you got, baby, thanks to men in power who voted it in because they recognized it was the right thing to do.) I am not a modern day feminist I dont think, but I do believe in equal rights for women, and I dont see how equal rights for women puts men at a disadvantage at all or is fascist. Fascism refers to when corporations and private interests govern a country. wtf?
S: You missed the boat again love.
FRIEND: i dont want ure f****n boat. ure…f****n stupid on this. (You heard her. Throw her off the boat!)
S: (my other friend) was only comparing feminism and fascism in a superficial way, read his comment again. My interest is not in the feminist movement of over a hundred years ago my interest is where we are at now. I am interested in developing my own.
WARCHICK Resa Laru Kirkland<~~~ Look up some of this *amazing goddesses* work if you can not wait till we speak. =) You more than likely wil not agree with a single thing she believes in, but read her "stuff" she has some good points. =)
"feel welcome to delete it w/out hurting my feewings. not that you really probably care about that."
What are you talking about? You are one of my favorites!♥ You think I try to argue with you and what not but I think we are debating...If we didn't piss each other off sometimes I wouldn't be able to claim so much homie ♥ for you...
Wtf I would hope that if someone disagreed with you on any given subject, that they wouldn't call you f*****g stupid- that's a cop-out...You *really* pissed me off with the comments you said over Memorial Day weekend but I didn't delete you from my friends like some other a*****s who just blew you off...If you wanna know what I think let's talk don't just blow me off it sucks and you are lots and lots more bunches of smart than that!!! =)
FRIEND: u just frustrate the f**k out of me when you tell me im not getting something. because i feel like you're not gettin it. get it?
S: Yeah but I'm not saying you don't "get it" you don't have all the information that I want you to know...
FRIEND: i looked at that chick and i would f****n spit on her f****n soul. She is the embodiment of everything i find evil and wrong in this f****n world. (Oh how I love fan mail!) and as we are all connected and i truly believe in the Buddhist proverb that says that every person is you, or in every person you should see yourself, or something like that., I would be willing to take the world down just to watch cockroaches like her go down. including myself, if any part of myself is her. (Again, you heard her!) whatever do you get my point? (Kumbayah, baby! Keep reading…it gets better…and by that I mean sadder.)
S: Lol ok, that's what I thought you'd say... Well, you probably look up a bit more than some of the Anti-feminist articles she wrote... looked* Like her views on immigration, and terrorists, ect... I told you she would oppose your views, but back to the original topic Feminism we will talk when I see you...
FRIEND: i just looked at more of her s**t. someone should f****n shoot her in the head and perform some sort of deep magick to make sure her soul does not continue on but instead gets snuffed out never to be a part of the universe again. :) im feeling creative right now. (“Come on people now, smile on your brother” Ya feel da love?) sorry for calling you stupid, but i didnt really call you stupid, (Then why did you apologize?) i said you were being stupid about that topic. (No, you called her stupid. See, with the left, they tell you what they did or didn’t JUST do and you MUST take their word for it, not think for yourself. You misunderstand their name calling and death threats; you can’t be trusted to properly interpret what they say or do.) i didnt even read any of this worm's views on feminism. (Ummm, you didn’t even read my views but let loose with a hellish vitriol that only a broad’s emoting can unleash? This level of mental illness that has infected the left is beyond comprehension.)
S: Yeah I know you hate her... I get it... (No, S, clearly you misunderstand her f*****g name-calling and death threats. Only the right hates.) How can you know I'm stupid on this topic and you don't even have my opinion? (Elitists just know, silly girl!)
FRIEND: i dont know anything, i just feel and trust my intuition. :) (See what she just said right here? Right here? THIS SUMS UP THE LEFT PERFECTLY! Like Schultz, they “know nut-ting!” Why do we listen to them? We should give them a bottle and make them take a nap. I’m not changing those diapers, though…they’re on their own).
S: Well if you don't know anything why do you want to have this convo? I dislike. You jumped my s**t over something you don't even know where I stand (Oh no, you misunderstand) ...you think you know where I stand... Or your intuition is that you know where I stand. (You’re misinformed.) Am I not going to college? (for a career of my own) Do I not vote?...Do I believe women should have all of these rights? The answer is yes, love.
FRIEND: if you dont want people, including me, to assume that you are enti-female rights, than dont join two groups that belittle females. (Or else!) you might have some explanation of your beliefs (Explain how you DARE believe contrary to me!) that go beyond a persons first conclusion on the topic, but i cant know that unless you tell me, so i started the convo hoping it was a joke, or that you were mis-informed (See?) on what an anti-feminist was. and just because I admit to not KNOWING anything, does not mean that I am not right, i am just open to the possibility that I am wrong. (When you figure out what the hell she’s trying to say here, email me, OK? ‘Cause WOW just seems inadequate.)
S: Well good then. =D If there is a possiblity I still can salvage this conversation, I will email you my paper I wrote on feminism and Resa's paper I wrote it on. The question is: are you willing to discuss this matter in a logical manner with me? ( Not a you're f*****g stupid on this way ) And don't get so mad, you are not a martyr for Feminism! I understand your passion but don't let that lovely passion of yours blind you for your love of me!!! =) (Beautifully spoken, S.) I am equally as passionate, but jeez girl don't get so mad. "Don't let anyone rent space in your head."
FRIEND: i said you 'might' be right about modern feminism, because besides upholding the rights that have already been earned, i am ignorant as to what they are up to. (Finally, something we really, really, REALLY agree on.) There's nothing fascist about feminism no matter what your opinions on fascism though. the only way i could think feminism could be called fascist is if we leave the corporate reference out of the definition of fascism, AND if feminists are trying to take over the country (If???) according to their values. maybe i need to be enlightened, (Maybe???) but i just havent noticed any feminist organizations with a strong voice in our government. i eagerly await the reading of your paper. :) (Apparently she’s been on Mars…in a cave…with her fingers in her ears…with the lights off…with no TV…no radio…no news…no brain activity. Kind of supports that whole Schultz theory, doesn’t it?)
S: …Despite my anger towards the evil human beings my hope and faith in humanity has been renewed, recently.
Two bright spots: Resa LuRu Kirkland and Michael Robert Eagen...♥
FRIEND: omg shannon i feel like i shouldnt be associated w/ you because you admire this women. she is scum! how could you? (Translation: You cannot handle your free will, hand it over to me!) i only care about it because i am so close to you. (I know better than you what’s best for you) otherwise i wouldnt give a f**k who you admired. i probably sound like a huge hypocrite, (PROBABLY???) but even though i feel like i shouldnt be associated with you we have tried to get away from each other numerous times and always come back so its worthless to think about it really. im stuck w/ you.
Well. That was exhausting…I mean seriously. And confusing. And outrageous. And deeply, deeply embedded in this generation of spoiled, ruined, decimated femininity.
And here to stay, if we let it. Because THAT is the way of communism; logic and reason need NOT apply.
Now here’s where hope comes into play. Look at S. Isn’t she magnificent? She stayed the course of logic and reason, not giving in to ad hominem, four-letter rages, death threats, admissions of mind-boggling refusal to even search and ponder by her “friend” that would have depleted the heartiest soul. She is reason enough to fight on, and not grow weary.
At least I don’t have to worry about FRIEND reading this. My articles don’t come in “feel.”
Keep the faith, bros, in all things courage, and no substitute for VICTORY.
My anti-femmie articles have always been my most popular. I have gotten emails from people all over the United States, Canada, Australia, India, Europe, and a few letters that may possibly be from other planets.
And no, I don’t mean that because the people who were writing them were wrong in their outrage. I mean because the behavior and beliefs they describe are so completely out of this world.
That’s feminism for you…ugly aliens and constantly a pain in the butt (anal probe joke).
It started with this sweet letter from a young woman (I’ll call her “S”), who had more courage at 20 than I have at 44:
I received an A on the paper I wrote on your article, "Women Should Reject Feminism."
I am just getting my feet wet in school, and liberal politics run rampant in my classrooms. I have to do quite a bit of dissecting and analyzing, not to get caught up in "their" BS.
I have been reading some of your "stuff"; I am very impressed with your strong, unforgiving viewpoints. You are very inspirational to me. Thanks.
~ S
Needless to say, I was overwhelmed that something I wrote had affected this young woman so profoundly, and I feel uncomfortable saying that out loud. Truth is what it is, and the credit goes there. I’m consistently stunned that people are consistently stunned by stating the truth out loud, as if we’re all in on some agreement not to do so in the name of politeness. Apparently we have forgotten that our obligation is to truth, not “feewings.” And here’s the evidence.
After responding to S, she shared with me a raging debate going on between her and a friend who had the same hippy views she was running into in the ironically named halls of “higher education.” Remarkably, and predictably, her friend is more educated than S is, yet far less capable of a rational thought or cogent response.
And it began with a woman who rejected an education system overrun with communism and started thinking and studying for herself. It is clear as she explains herself and the debate with her “friend” that one of them follows the textbook behavior of evil: distract, divert, evade, deny, lie, ad hominem, and wear them out without ever actually addressing the subject at hand.
Anything but the truth. By their fruits…
In her own words, they are NOT in need of any editing other than names for privacy’s sake and personal commentary. What you are about to read about S makes the debate that follows, between her and her “educated” friend, even more remarkable…and inspiring (my commentary in red):
Warchick,
F*****g A right you have permission! I am tickled to death!!! =D
Speaking to her is utterly exhausting! Talking to her on everything from immigration to supporting our soldiers is mind numbing! Over Memorial Day weekend, she made comments about our girls and boys in uniform that turned my stomach and literally made me want to be sick! She is so lost and confused and it’s not even that her viewpoints, opposing my own, that bothers me, it is her complete lack of knowledge and the fact that she is ignorant of how to discuss anything in a clear, concise, logical manner. If she at least possessed some better argumentation skills, I could respect her opinion. She spews emotion after reaction after emotion. No logic. No freaking brain. Not like I have to tell you… I believe the conversation is now over so I will send it to you. Do your worst! (Best) =) (She stated this so concisely and accurately that my commentary is unnecessary.)
It ended with her realizing that she held no quarter to…my logic. Alas, she can see *some* light and now I remember why I bother with this sweet, uninformed girl. The saddest part about the whole thing is she is far more educated than I. I am not ashamed to say (due to excruciating family circumstances) I am a ninth grade dropout! She has an associate in psychology, and on her way to a bachelor. It is so scary to me; even the most educated people of this country are some of the most ignorant. Her degree, I think she feels, gives her the right to be an idiot! What does your education mean to you?! Scary! I just finished my first two college classes, with good grades. =) I haven’t been to school in more than eight years. “Diamond in the rough.” =)…
I was scared to show you the conversation, because of possible legal backlash. (My friend defaming your name or using threatening language) I should have known better! You are a real person, and you are intelligent enough to know political correctness is for people with idle minds. =)
I was also very surprised you took an interest in me at all or even replied to me at all. It took me a while to think over and realize why you even took the time to respond to my messages. I realize now that people like my friend are as disgusted by you, as we are them. (Left vs. Right) I also realize you need (well not exactly) people like me to encourage you. You are completely “Right” (pun intended) and out on a limb (and our numbers are not as strong as they should be) anything I can say or do to encourage you in your work is an honor. =)
~S
P.S. You can leave the bit out about me being an eighth grade drop-out, in your article. Like I said; I am not ashamed, I feel it may disparage your own point. (Dark past, extremely bright future) =)
Look at her reasoning, her perception, her decency, in the above and below, and contrast that with her friend’s convoluted logic and behavior below. You want to know the difference between the left and right? Read! It’s long, tough to get through, and as S said, exhausting. But it’s too important to shorten, and the perfect commentary on the idiocy of feminism and all leftist thinking. (Lightly edited for language, but not spelling, grammar, or logic…obviously).
FRIEND: I tried to send this as a message, but something is glitching, so i have to post it here. if it makes you mad, feel welcome to delete it w/out hurting my feewings. not that you really probably care about that. k? k.
i think it is soo ignorant (meaning lack of information or knowledge on subject) of you to be anti-femini...st, thats just f*****g stupid. So you dont think we have the right to be paid fairly, to vote, to divorce our husbands, to not wear dresses every f****n day, to question the men in our lives, to hold jobs besides teachers, nurses, secretaries and nannies????? Feminists and feminists alone brought about all the changes that brought these sort of rights to us. (Exactly how many women were in power? Oh right, those were majority old white European males who enacted laws on vote, land ownership, etc. But in femmie-speak, women did it because…well, I guess ‘cause they say so.)
S: No love-love you don't know my views we've never discussed this one I absolutely want everythin you mention above, we will talk...Haha friend you funny you think I'm so ignorant, you broke down ignorant for me... =D (Ooooooh! That’s gonna leave a mark!)
FRIEND: you might be right about modern feminism, but with everything i know about feminism in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, you're just wrong. (What does that have to do with the 21st Century?) There is nothing unequal and fascist about women wanting to vote, or having the right to disagree with their husbands or divorce them, or work in whatever field they aspire to work in and... be paid equally, which were all goals of feminism. (Which you got, baby, thanks to men in power who voted it in because they recognized it was the right thing to do.) I am not a modern day feminist I dont think, but I do believe in equal rights for women, and I dont see how equal rights for women puts men at a disadvantage at all or is fascist. Fascism refers to when corporations and private interests govern a country. wtf?
S: You missed the boat again love.
FRIEND: i dont want ure f****n boat. ure…f****n stupid on this. (You heard her. Throw her off the boat!)
S: (my other friend) was only comparing feminism and fascism in a superficial way, read his comment again. My interest is not in the feminist movement of over a hundred years ago my interest is where we are at now. I am interested in developing my own.
WARCHICK Resa Laru Kirkland<~~~ Look up some of this *amazing goddesses* work if you can not wait till we speak. =) You more than likely wil not agree with a single thing she believes in, but read her "stuff" she has some good points. =)
"feel welcome to delete it w/out hurting my feewings. not that you really probably care about that."
What are you talking about? You are one of my favorites!♥ You think I try to argue with you and what not but I think we are debating...If we didn't piss each other off sometimes I wouldn't be able to claim so much homie ♥ for you...
Wtf I would hope that if someone disagreed with you on any given subject, that they wouldn't call you f*****g stupid- that's a cop-out...You *really* pissed me off with the comments you said over Memorial Day weekend but I didn't delete you from my friends like some other a*****s who just blew you off...If you wanna know what I think let's talk don't just blow me off it sucks and you are lots and lots more bunches of smart than that!!! =)
FRIEND: u just frustrate the f**k out of me when you tell me im not getting something. because i feel like you're not gettin it. get it?
S: Yeah but I'm not saying you don't "get it" you don't have all the information that I want you to know...
FRIEND: i looked at that chick and i would f****n spit on her f****n soul. She is the embodiment of everything i find evil and wrong in this f****n world. (Oh how I love fan mail!) and as we are all connected and i truly believe in the Buddhist proverb that says that every person is you, or in every person you should see yourself, or something like that., I would be willing to take the world down just to watch cockroaches like her go down. including myself, if any part of myself is her. (Again, you heard her!) whatever do you get my point? (Kumbayah, baby! Keep reading…it gets better…and by that I mean sadder.)
S: Lol ok, that's what I thought you'd say... Well, you probably look up a bit more than some of the Anti-feminist articles she wrote... looked* Like her views on immigration, and terrorists, ect... I told you she would oppose your views, but back to the original topic Feminism we will talk when I see you...
FRIEND: i just looked at more of her s**t. someone should f****n shoot her in the head and perform some sort of deep magick to make sure her soul does not continue on but instead gets snuffed out never to be a part of the universe again. :) im feeling creative right now. (“Come on people now, smile on your brother” Ya feel da love?) sorry for calling you stupid, but i didnt really call you stupid, (Then why did you apologize?) i said you were being stupid about that topic. (No, you called her stupid. See, with the left, they tell you what they did or didn’t JUST do and you MUST take their word for it, not think for yourself. You misunderstand their name calling and death threats; you can’t be trusted to properly interpret what they say or do.) i didnt even read any of this worm's views on feminism. (Ummm, you didn’t even read my views but let loose with a hellish vitriol that only a broad’s emoting can unleash? This level of mental illness that has infected the left is beyond comprehension.)
S: Yeah I know you hate her... I get it... (No, S, clearly you misunderstand her f*****g name-calling and death threats. Only the right hates.) How can you know I'm stupid on this topic and you don't even have my opinion? (Elitists just know, silly girl!)
FRIEND: i dont know anything, i just feel and trust my intuition. :) (See what she just said right here? Right here? THIS SUMS UP THE LEFT PERFECTLY! Like Schultz, they “know nut-ting!” Why do we listen to them? We should give them a bottle and make them take a nap. I’m not changing those diapers, though…they’re on their own).
S: Well if you don't know anything why do you want to have this convo? I dislike. You jumped my s**t over something you don't even know where I stand (Oh no, you misunderstand) ...you think you know where I stand... Or your intuition is that you know where I stand. (You’re misinformed.) Am I not going to college? (for a career of my own) Do I not vote?...Do I believe women should have all of these rights? The answer is yes, love.
FRIEND: if you dont want people, including me, to assume that you are enti-female rights, than dont join two groups that belittle females. (Or else!) you might have some explanation of your beliefs (Explain how you DARE believe contrary to me!) that go beyond a persons first conclusion on the topic, but i cant know that unless you tell me, so i started the convo hoping it was a joke, or that you were mis-informed (See?) on what an anti-feminist was. and just because I admit to not KNOWING anything, does not mean that I am not right, i am just open to the possibility that I am wrong. (When you figure out what the hell she’s trying to say here, email me, OK? ‘Cause WOW just seems inadequate.)
S: Well good then. =D If there is a possiblity I still can salvage this conversation, I will email you my paper I wrote on feminism and Resa's paper I wrote it on. The question is: are you willing to discuss this matter in a logical manner with me? ( Not a you're f*****g stupid on this way ) And don't get so mad, you are not a martyr for Feminism! I understand your passion but don't let that lovely passion of yours blind you for your love of me!!! =) (Beautifully spoken, S.) I am equally as passionate, but jeez girl don't get so mad. "Don't let anyone rent space in your head."
FRIEND: i said you 'might' be right about modern feminism, because besides upholding the rights that have already been earned, i am ignorant as to what they are up to. (Finally, something we really, really, REALLY agree on.) There's nothing fascist about feminism no matter what your opinions on fascism though. the only way i could think feminism could be called fascist is if we leave the corporate reference out of the definition of fascism, AND if feminists are trying to take over the country (If???) according to their values. maybe i need to be enlightened, (Maybe???) but i just havent noticed any feminist organizations with a strong voice in our government. i eagerly await the reading of your paper. :) (Apparently she’s been on Mars…in a cave…with her fingers in her ears…with the lights off…with no TV…no radio…no news…no brain activity. Kind of supports that whole Schultz theory, doesn’t it?)
S: …Despite my anger towards the evil human beings my hope and faith in humanity has been renewed, recently.
Two bright spots: Resa LuRu Kirkland and Michael Robert Eagen...♥
FRIEND: omg shannon i feel like i shouldnt be associated w/ you because you admire this women. she is scum! how could you? (Translation: You cannot handle your free will, hand it over to me!) i only care about it because i am so close to you. (I know better than you what’s best for you) otherwise i wouldnt give a f**k who you admired. i probably sound like a huge hypocrite, (PROBABLY???) but even though i feel like i shouldnt be associated with you we have tried to get away from each other numerous times and always come back so its worthless to think about it really. im stuck w/ you.
Well. That was exhausting…I mean seriously. And confusing. And outrageous. And deeply, deeply embedded in this generation of spoiled, ruined, decimated femininity.
And here to stay, if we let it. Because THAT is the way of communism; logic and reason need NOT apply.
Now here’s where hope comes into play. Look at S. Isn’t she magnificent? She stayed the course of logic and reason, not giving in to ad hominem, four-letter rages, death threats, admissions of mind-boggling refusal to even search and ponder by her “friend” that would have depleted the heartiest soul. She is reason enough to fight on, and not grow weary.
At least I don’t have to worry about FRIEND reading this. My articles don’t come in “feel.”
Keep the faith, bros, in all things courage, and no substitute for VICTORY.
Tuesday, June 08, 2010
RubinReports: Reuters Airbrushes Knife Held by Jihad warrior "humanitarian" on Gaza flotilla Ship
RubinReports: Reuters Airbrushes Knife Held by Jihad warrior "humanitarian" on Gaza flotilla Ship
Everyone take a baby aspirin before you read up on this shocker!!!! Not recommended for those with weak heart or affected by the disease of Islammunism. -- WARCHICK
Everyone take a baby aspirin before you read up on this shocker!!!! Not recommended for those with weak heart or affected by the disease of Islammunism. -- WARCHICK
Monday, June 07, 2010
Not buying it
From the Korean Central News Agency, June 7, 2010...Apparently Kim and Mohammed are only sharing "football" secrets.
Workshop for FIFA Referees Held
Pyongyang, June 7 (KCNA) -- A workshop for FIFA referees was held from June 1 to 6 at Kim Il Sung Stadium in Pyongyang.
The workshop, divided into theoretical and practical courses, was attended by international and national referees of Korea, football coaches from different sports teams and teachers of juvenile sports schools in the country.
It deals with the match rules, referee's role and signals in match, warming-up exercise method, training of persevering in fast running, etc.
The courses were given by Mohamad Rodzali bin Yacob and Ahmad Khalidi Supian, lecturers of FIFA.
Workshop for FIFA Referees Held
Pyongyang, June 7 (KCNA) -- A workshop for FIFA referees was held from June 1 to 6 at Kim Il Sung Stadium in Pyongyang.
The workshop, divided into theoretical and practical courses, was attended by international and national referees of Korea, football coaches from different sports teams and teachers of juvenile sports schools in the country.
It deals with the match rules, referee's role and signals in match, warming-up exercise method, training of persevering in fast running, etc.
The courses were given by Mohamad Rodzali bin Yacob and Ahmad Khalidi Supian, lecturers of FIFA.
Big Hollywood » Blog Archive » Two American War Films
Big Hollywood » Blog Archive » Two American War Films
JACK MARINO---the man, the vision, the VICTORY!!! I'm so happy for him...please spread the word -- WARCHICK
JACK MARINO---the man, the vision, the VICTORY!!! I'm so happy for him...please spread the word -- WARCHICK
Sunday, June 06, 2010
THE CROSS WE BEAR; The Mosque We Won't
By: Resa LaRu Kirkland
On the West Side….
It first ended in 1918 (or so we thought), then began in 1934. It was replaced with a metal one in 1984, and became a subject of controversy in 2002. It was covered with a shroud while lawyers argued its offense factor until 2010, when courts ruled it could stay and lose the veil.
The majority wept with joy, secure in the thought that this friend would remain steady whenever they looked up.
The item of all the controversy, offense, lawyers, courts, and shrouding—a simple white cross honoring American warriors of WWI—joyfully returned for another 76 years standing guard over the harsh and unforgiving world it was willing to purchase with its own eternal vigilance.
And two weeks later, in a display of spoiled, spineless, hippy fagatronics, the Politically Castrated minority took their ball and went home like the cowards they are. They decided if they couldn’t get their way through the law, they’d take it into their own impotent, pathetic, mob-clenched hands.
They stole the 76 year old cross, secure in the thought that their gutlessness would not be offended by the stoic appearance of this symbol of unselfish love one more day.
On the East Side….
It first ended in 1993 (or so we thought), then began in 1998 and 2000. It was replaced with the largest one in 2001, and became a subject of outrage. It was left as is until 2010, when a community board ruled it no offense factor and ordered that it must wear a veil.
The majority wept, horrified by the thought that this fiend would remain whenever they looked up.
The item of all the controversy, offense, lawyers, boards, and shrouding—a massive, 13-story mosque honoring the satanic ideology that murdered Americans of 9/11 on the very sight of their slaughter—gleefully established for a beginning time and times, standing harsh and unforgiving over the world it was willing to purchase with its own psychotic bloodlust.
And two weeks later, in a display of courage born of ENOUGH, the freedom-motivated majority took their balls back from Political Castration and left their homes like the warriors they are. They decided if they could be abandoned by the law, they’d take a stand to remind the enemy exactly who that law served, and who it must obey.
They stole to the site where the destroyer had struck, where he desired his display less than a decade after felling ours, ensuring that this gutless enemy would be offended by their infidel appearance every single day.
It’s a tale of two coasts, both in the same nation, playing out in the media at the same time.
What a difference a time zone makes, apparently. In the West, it took 76 years of standing strong for the universal symbol of humility and unselfishness to get the official OK. In the East, it took less than 10 years of scar tissue for the universal symbol of force and selfish evil to get the official OK.
For the sake of truth and right, the West saw the light. For the sake of Political Castration and appearance, the East abandoned it.
On Sunday, June 6, 2010, a new D Day is going down. Two of the greatest warriors I know, Pamela Geller and Robert Spencer, are hosting a STOP THE MOSQUE rally in New York. All who understand what this mosque at this place in this nation at this time means—(the first thing Islam does when it conquers through jihad or more recently through Political Castration is to erect a massive mosque; this is a symbol of conquest to the Muslim world, and more ominous, a signal)—need to storm this beach, willing to risk gossip, harsh words, slander, stones, or worse, just as our grandfathers did on the 6th day of the 6th month 66 years ago. They risked more than their standing and hurt feelings when they placed their boots on the sands of Normandy to stop another beast in his froth against the free.
On the West coast, they stood for the cross. On the East coast, they will march against the mosque. Do not be distracted, do not be confused, do not be apathetic: this is our Normandy.
This mosque must not be. No amount of fancy words can distract from the truth of what is unfolding now, for it is truth to which we owe our obligation, not politeness. Our grandfathers knew it. June 6th is again D Day: Decision Day. Choose your side, for it has come to that, and you are free men. When faced with wickedness, choosing is inevitable, and the righteous fear it not.
Keep the faith, bros, in all things courage, and no substitute for VICTORY.
On the West Side….
It first ended in 1918 (or so we thought), then began in 1934. It was replaced with a metal one in 1984, and became a subject of controversy in 2002. It was covered with a shroud while lawyers argued its offense factor until 2010, when courts ruled it could stay and lose the veil.
The majority wept with joy, secure in the thought that this friend would remain steady whenever they looked up.
The item of all the controversy, offense, lawyers, courts, and shrouding—a simple white cross honoring American warriors of WWI—joyfully returned for another 76 years standing guard over the harsh and unforgiving world it was willing to purchase with its own eternal vigilance.
And two weeks later, in a display of spoiled, spineless, hippy fagatronics, the Politically Castrated minority took their ball and went home like the cowards they are. They decided if they couldn’t get their way through the law, they’d take it into their own impotent, pathetic, mob-clenched hands.
They stole the 76 year old cross, secure in the thought that their gutlessness would not be offended by the stoic appearance of this symbol of unselfish love one more day.
On the East Side….
It first ended in 1993 (or so we thought), then began in 1998 and 2000. It was replaced with the largest one in 2001, and became a subject of outrage. It was left as is until 2010, when a community board ruled it no offense factor and ordered that it must wear a veil.
The majority wept, horrified by the thought that this fiend would remain whenever they looked up.
The item of all the controversy, offense, lawyers, boards, and shrouding—a massive, 13-story mosque honoring the satanic ideology that murdered Americans of 9/11 on the very sight of their slaughter—gleefully established for a beginning time and times, standing harsh and unforgiving over the world it was willing to purchase with its own psychotic bloodlust.
And two weeks later, in a display of courage born of ENOUGH, the freedom-motivated majority took their balls back from Political Castration and left their homes like the warriors they are. They decided if they could be abandoned by the law, they’d take a stand to remind the enemy exactly who that law served, and who it must obey.
They stole to the site where the destroyer had struck, where he desired his display less than a decade after felling ours, ensuring that this gutless enemy would be offended by their infidel appearance every single day.
It’s a tale of two coasts, both in the same nation, playing out in the media at the same time.
What a difference a time zone makes, apparently. In the West, it took 76 years of standing strong for the universal symbol of humility and unselfishness to get the official OK. In the East, it took less than 10 years of scar tissue for the universal symbol of force and selfish evil to get the official OK.
For the sake of truth and right, the West saw the light. For the sake of Political Castration and appearance, the East abandoned it.
On Sunday, June 6, 2010, a new D Day is going down. Two of the greatest warriors I know, Pamela Geller and Robert Spencer, are hosting a STOP THE MOSQUE rally in New York. All who understand what this mosque at this place in this nation at this time means—(the first thing Islam does when it conquers through jihad or more recently through Political Castration is to erect a massive mosque; this is a symbol of conquest to the Muslim world, and more ominous, a signal)—need to storm this beach, willing to risk gossip, harsh words, slander, stones, or worse, just as our grandfathers did on the 6th day of the 6th month 66 years ago. They risked more than their standing and hurt feelings when they placed their boots on the sands of Normandy to stop another beast in his froth against the free.
On the West coast, they stood for the cross. On the East coast, they will march against the mosque. Do not be distracted, do not be confused, do not be apathetic: this is our Normandy.
This mosque must not be. No amount of fancy words can distract from the truth of what is unfolding now, for it is truth to which we owe our obligation, not politeness. Our grandfathers knew it. June 6th is again D Day: Decision Day. Choose your side, for it has come to that, and you are free men. When faced with wickedness, choosing is inevitable, and the righteous fear it not.
Keep the faith, bros, in all things courage, and no substitute for VICTORY.
ISLAMMUNISM...Two Fronts, One Enemy
By: Resa LaRu Kirkland
“…we have seen in the past – over and over again – that evil seeks out evil, that they create secret combinations and make blood oaths against the good people of the earth. They bond together in their mutual treachery, and no malevolence is too much for them to consider. They will try to distract us from their wickedness by claiming it is all for God – as Islam does. Or it is our fault for being fat, spoiled Americans – as North Korea does daily. Or, even more vile, they will point to American sins and excess and claim that we are merely "reaping what we've sown." And being kind, forgiving and self-evaluating people, we hesitate just long enough for them to strike at us. – 2-front war, by Resa LaRu Kirkland, October, 2002
I wrote those words almost 8 years ago now, in a three piecer on the chilling alliance that has been clearly forming between Islam and Communism for the past 2 decades. Given what’s going on now, can we dispense with the frantic attempts to call it what it isn’t and settle on what we are dealing with here: Islammunism, the coming together of Islam and Communism?
North Korea, that unresolved boil on the butt of humanity left over from our first unfinished war against Communism 60 years and counting now, has drastically ratcheted up the posturing since Pres. Obama took office.
And now it’s official: they sank the battleship.
South Korea’s study of the explosion came up with oodles of evidence. That, coupled with North Korea’s hellish tendency to lie, cover up, and threaten, means the most heavily guarded border in the world is in for a long, hot summer, full of tension, cowardly hit-and-run attacks from the commie side, and possibly a pinch of plutonium.
And that’s just the hand North Korea wants us to see.
The one we don’t see is up to its commie elbow in Islam, happy to achieve with jihad what it never could with a cold war. I guess concentration camps, famine, or the Dear Leader’s status as a partial deity just aren’t enough to keep the Stalinist state busy.
Now they’ve set their sights on the sea.
Motives? Well, since you’ve apparently been in a coma for the past two decades, Islammunism is the foundational cause, but mammon is ALWAYS the way. And greasing the skids is manipulated celebrity the Hippy Press is only too happy to give to the enemies of freedom.
As with the missile and nuke tests NK is infamous for, I’ve wondered if the attack was this nauseous nation’s “sample of the goods” for the entire jihadi world to witness. Yep, the good old “show me the money” aspect simply cannot be ignored. After all, NK sold the same nuke tech to Iran and Libya that Pakistan sold to them that AQ Khan swiped from UNESCO…Da Money Honey motive is always in play, and mammon continues to win the day.
No doubt about it, this was a resounding provocation in the Far East by one hand of Islammunism. And over the weekend, a deliberate provocation in the Middle East by the other. Both provocateurs on the same side—evil oppression—and both targets on the same side—freedom.
But was it also a signal? Was it NK saying, “Your product is ready?” Was it them saying, “Go ahead and start something, we’ve got this side?”
It really doesn’t matter, since both have the same intent: create multiple fronts to confuse, divert, and weaken the only force on earth capable of stopping them.
The result is the same too: “whatever you do, don’t make the bad guys mad, or they’ll do more. Why not alter the consequences their actions require? That’ll teach them to embrace love and rainbows and butterflies, the whole world will share a Coke and a smile, and society will transform into a hippy love-fest.”
That’s worked beautifully so far. Just wait until the “Ships of Chittim” add plutonium to the mix.
We’re on our own, and I don’t know about you, but I’ve had enough. I’m ready.
Keep the faith, bros, in all things courage, and no substitute for VICTORY.
Saturday, June 05, 2010
THE COGENT RESPONSE TO GAYS IN THE MILITARY; FROM THE ONLY ONES WHOSE OPINION MATTER
By: Resa Laru Kirkland
I was intending to write an article on this subject myself, but was blown away by a letter I received from a warrior who is overseas, doing history’s work: fighting for freedom. His response is the epitome of logical sequencing and reasoned analysis, scientific in its conclusions and mathematical in its preciseness.
In other words, indisputable in its truth, the final nail in the coffin of iron-gripped Political Castration.
There is no way I could have done better. I am printing it here unabridged, and as per his request, giving no clues to his name or service. Shame, really, that he must fear retaliation for truth. Such a response is supposed to be reserved for the lie.
Welcome to Armageddon…with our permission born of sloth.
The logical place to begin this discussion is in describing the purpose of the military. Despite recent mission changes that reflect a greater focus on stability operations, ie., nation-building, the primary purpose of the military is to violently execute political goals that cannot otherwise be effected through diplomacy and other non-violent avenues of approach (sanctions, boycotts, etc.). We exist to destroy those who would threaten our political and economic existence. Any change to the military, whether it is in training, equipment, doctrine, or social norms, should be to enhance the lethality of our Armed Forces.
Soldiers are trained to fight as a team, not as individuals. If you look at something as simple as the construction of sectors of fires in a defense, you understand immediately that the primary goal of individual fighting positions is to protect your team members to the left and right of your position. It is not to defend your front. Your front is covered by your buddies to your left and right. In other words, trust and reliance on your team members are absolutely essential. Soldiers live together- at times in conditions that most civilians would find completely uncivilized- sleep together, eat together, shower together, and even defecate together in open slit trenches, in order to accomplish the mission. It is a very strange relationship they share because their lives are so open and inter-connected. During combat, the intensity and necessity of that relationship grows. You must believe that your team members have your survival and well-being as the second highest priority during battle. Notice that I said, "second highest priority". The top priority of any military action is to accomplish the mission.
When Congress or the military attempts to inject social engineering, specifically open homosexuality in the ranks, into this relationship, it is a disaster in the making. Now- instead of mission accomplishment being the top priority- it is individual rights and relationships that become the priority. I find it to be very ironic that Congress and the President are choosing to deal with this issue in the midst of a two front war on Global Terrorism. It is very revealing that the top military concern of the Democrats is allowing open homosexuality into the ranks rather than defeating the enemy in our wars.
If we take homosexuals at their word, they did not choose to be gay. They are, according to them, born gay and are biologically attracted to people of the same sex. If that is the case, what impact does sexual attraction have on military teams? It has a huge and devastating impact. This is even true with heterosexuals and is why the Army has rules against establishing relationships between heterosexuals within the same chain of command. I have served for 26 years. One of the things that I have noticed is when a female is thrown in the mix of a male-dominated world, the males naturally begin competing for her attention. It is not, necessarily, that they are trying to sleep with her, but the natural tendency for heterosexual males is to attract the attention of the opposite sex. It throws a wrench in the relationship between the males. This is why men who serve in Combat Arms branches do not prefer to have women fighting on the front lines. The presence of a female skews the male mentality. Men, by nature, choose to protect women at the expense of protecting their male counterparts. Again, this has deadly consequences when the bullets are flying. If gays are biologically wired to be gay, than they, too, must have this desire to protect the males to whom they are attracted. Instead of focusing on accomplishing the mission and protecting the men to their left and right, they would be more concerned with protecting their attraction.
And how does Congress propose to house gay Soldiers? Are they going to billet gay men with females? What would Congress say if the Army started housing heterosexual males with females in the barracks? Is it not the same thing if you house openly gay males with heterosexual males or other gay Soldiers? Why should they be given special treatment? (I am quite certain that most heterosexual males who were housed with females would consider it special treatment...in a good way.) If the plan is to provide gay barracks, then why are they allowed to live and sleep with their sexual counterparts and heterosexuals are not? We are also talking about a very small minority of Soldiers. If gays are housed separately, then they would enjoy more living space than heterosexual Soldiers. If you have one gay in your company, does he get his own tent or own room, even if he is a Private? Is that just?
Has the military surveyed Soldiers to see how they feel? I receive dozens of surveys from the military in my email every year. I have never been given a survey on this issue. Why? Why has the military refused to even ask those who would be the most affected by this policy? Why are generals more concerned with appeasing politicians than doing what is best for those who fight and die for this country? I am trying to be unemotional about this, but what is occurring on Capitol Hill and even within the ranks of the senior leadership of the military is a disgrace. Thank God the Marine Corps Chief of Staff spoke like a Soldier. But when an Army general echoed the same sentiment as the Marine, he was disciplined. Why? Who in the Army leadership thinks that a general, who is echoing the majority sentiment of Soldiers, should be disciplined for stating an opinion that defends what Soldiers believe?
The heart of the issue boils down to this: Congress and the President (and I fear some in the military leadership) are more concerned about the sexuality of Soldiers than the efficacy of the military in destroying our enemies. This focus is so far off track and incredible that it is difficult to find the appropriate words to describe. It is further proof that American culture is in decline. I would be just as opposed to any move to make heterosexuality the primary focus of the military rather than destroying the enemy.
I acknowledge that gays have served in the military since military forces were created in ancient times. I have no issue with someone who is gay and serves in the military. But I do not want to know about it and I do not want my squad, platoon, or company to know about it. It is a divisive issue that destroys team integrity. And it will most certainly do this if a homosexual Soldier decides it his "right" to flaunt his gayness. I was most disappointed to read an article a few weeks ago when an alliance of milbloggers came out in support of open homosexuality in the service. I understand why they might make this decision. It is, in my view, based on the fact that we all know gays who have served. But I think people who are not currently in the tent, shower, foxhole, latrine...the fight...forget the detrimental impact that openly gay Soldiers would have on the front lines.
It is truly a sad day in our history when the most talked about issue of our Armed Forces, in the midst of two wars, is about the sexual preference of Soldiers. I think it is a sign of just how self-centered and immature the "adults" who lead our country have become. We are more concerned about satiating our sexual desires than we are about ensuring the very survival of our civilization. Don't ask, don't tell is a policy that has worked. It allows gays to serve in the military. It prevents elevating a Soldier's sexual preference above mission accomplishment and what is best for the military. Today, a gay, male Soldier can receive the Medal of Honor, reach the rank of General, and serve in any military occupation to which he is qualified. There are no restrictions placed upon him, other than the fact that he cannot announce his homosexuality. And why should he? Are gays so insecure in their sexual preferences that they must demand that others accept what, statistically, is deviant behavior? What benefit does the military derive in allowing open homosexuality? How does it make the military better, more effective, and stronger? If the answer is that it allows gays to feel better about themselves, then that is the wrong answer. The military is not about making gay or straight Soldiers feel better about themselves. It is about defending our nation. It should be about making our service members feel better about our nation. (But the Cult of Diversity, to which the homosexual debate belongs, has seriously damaged even this aspect of the military culture. See Gen. Casey's remarks after the Ft. Hood jihadist killed 13 people.) If the answer is that allowing open homosexuality does not make the military better, then we should not even be having this discussion. It is the topic of self-centered, immature "adults" who choose to identify themselves by a sexual act rather than the character and qualities that make a person, gay or straight, a truly responsible and mature citizen of this nation.
Warchick:
So I said it. I apologize for the length, but as you can tell, this issue seriously concerns me. Trash it if you want. Again, I did not mean to offend anyone. My concern is the effectiveness of our forces. This debate has nothing to do with improving the military. In fact, it is detrimental to the military...in my view. I would appreciate anonymity on this. Isn't it sad that I have to fear retribution for simply stating an opposing view to the gay lobby?
At ease, soldier…you did right, and we must NEVER apologize for truth, for if you are offended by truth, it is because you are on the wrong side of it. Our obligation is supposed to be to the truth, NOT politeness. ’Nuff said.
Keep the faith, bros, in all things courage, and no substitute for VICTORY.
I was intending to write an article on this subject myself, but was blown away by a letter I received from a warrior who is overseas, doing history’s work: fighting for freedom. His response is the epitome of logical sequencing and reasoned analysis, scientific in its conclusions and mathematical in its preciseness.
In other words, indisputable in its truth, the final nail in the coffin of iron-gripped Political Castration.
There is no way I could have done better. I am printing it here unabridged, and as per his request, giving no clues to his name or service. Shame, really, that he must fear retaliation for truth. Such a response is supposed to be reserved for the lie.
Welcome to Armageddon…with our permission born of sloth.
The logical place to begin this discussion is in describing the purpose of the military. Despite recent mission changes that reflect a greater focus on stability operations, ie., nation-building, the primary purpose of the military is to violently execute political goals that cannot otherwise be effected through diplomacy and other non-violent avenues of approach (sanctions, boycotts, etc.). We exist to destroy those who would threaten our political and economic existence. Any change to the military, whether it is in training, equipment, doctrine, or social norms, should be to enhance the lethality of our Armed Forces.
Soldiers are trained to fight as a team, not as individuals. If you look at something as simple as the construction of sectors of fires in a defense, you understand immediately that the primary goal of individual fighting positions is to protect your team members to the left and right of your position. It is not to defend your front. Your front is covered by your buddies to your left and right. In other words, trust and reliance on your team members are absolutely essential. Soldiers live together- at times in conditions that most civilians would find completely uncivilized- sleep together, eat together, shower together, and even defecate together in open slit trenches, in order to accomplish the mission. It is a very strange relationship they share because their lives are so open and inter-connected. During combat, the intensity and necessity of that relationship grows. You must believe that your team members have your survival and well-being as the second highest priority during battle. Notice that I said, "second highest priority". The top priority of any military action is to accomplish the mission.
When Congress or the military attempts to inject social engineering, specifically open homosexuality in the ranks, into this relationship, it is a disaster in the making. Now- instead of mission accomplishment being the top priority- it is individual rights and relationships that become the priority. I find it to be very ironic that Congress and the President are choosing to deal with this issue in the midst of a two front war on Global Terrorism. It is very revealing that the top military concern of the Democrats is allowing open homosexuality into the ranks rather than defeating the enemy in our wars.
If we take homosexuals at their word, they did not choose to be gay. They are, according to them, born gay and are biologically attracted to people of the same sex. If that is the case, what impact does sexual attraction have on military teams? It has a huge and devastating impact. This is even true with heterosexuals and is why the Army has rules against establishing relationships between heterosexuals within the same chain of command. I have served for 26 years. One of the things that I have noticed is when a female is thrown in the mix of a male-dominated world, the males naturally begin competing for her attention. It is not, necessarily, that they are trying to sleep with her, but the natural tendency for heterosexual males is to attract the attention of the opposite sex. It throws a wrench in the relationship between the males. This is why men who serve in Combat Arms branches do not prefer to have women fighting on the front lines. The presence of a female skews the male mentality. Men, by nature, choose to protect women at the expense of protecting their male counterparts. Again, this has deadly consequences when the bullets are flying. If gays are biologically wired to be gay, than they, too, must have this desire to protect the males to whom they are attracted. Instead of focusing on accomplishing the mission and protecting the men to their left and right, they would be more concerned with protecting their attraction.
And how does Congress propose to house gay Soldiers? Are they going to billet gay men with females? What would Congress say if the Army started housing heterosexual males with females in the barracks? Is it not the same thing if you house openly gay males with heterosexual males or other gay Soldiers? Why should they be given special treatment? (I am quite certain that most heterosexual males who were housed with females would consider it special treatment...in a good way.) If the plan is to provide gay barracks, then why are they allowed to live and sleep with their sexual counterparts and heterosexuals are not? We are also talking about a very small minority of Soldiers. If gays are housed separately, then they would enjoy more living space than heterosexual Soldiers. If you have one gay in your company, does he get his own tent or own room, even if he is a Private? Is that just?
Has the military surveyed Soldiers to see how they feel? I receive dozens of surveys from the military in my email every year. I have never been given a survey on this issue. Why? Why has the military refused to even ask those who would be the most affected by this policy? Why are generals more concerned with appeasing politicians than doing what is best for those who fight and die for this country? I am trying to be unemotional about this, but what is occurring on Capitol Hill and even within the ranks of the senior leadership of the military is a disgrace. Thank God the Marine Corps Chief of Staff spoke like a Soldier. But when an Army general echoed the same sentiment as the Marine, he was disciplined. Why? Who in the Army leadership thinks that a general, who is echoing the majority sentiment of Soldiers, should be disciplined for stating an opinion that defends what Soldiers believe?
The heart of the issue boils down to this: Congress and the President (and I fear some in the military leadership) are more concerned about the sexuality of Soldiers than the efficacy of the military in destroying our enemies. This focus is so far off track and incredible that it is difficult to find the appropriate words to describe. It is further proof that American culture is in decline. I would be just as opposed to any move to make heterosexuality the primary focus of the military rather than destroying the enemy.
I acknowledge that gays have served in the military since military forces were created in ancient times. I have no issue with someone who is gay and serves in the military. But I do not want to know about it and I do not want my squad, platoon, or company to know about it. It is a divisive issue that destroys team integrity. And it will most certainly do this if a homosexual Soldier decides it his "right" to flaunt his gayness. I was most disappointed to read an article a few weeks ago when an alliance of milbloggers came out in support of open homosexuality in the service. I understand why they might make this decision. It is, in my view, based on the fact that we all know gays who have served. But I think people who are not currently in the tent, shower, foxhole, latrine...the fight...forget the detrimental impact that openly gay Soldiers would have on the front lines.
It is truly a sad day in our history when the most talked about issue of our Armed Forces, in the midst of two wars, is about the sexual preference of Soldiers. I think it is a sign of just how self-centered and immature the "adults" who lead our country have become. We are more concerned about satiating our sexual desires than we are about ensuring the very survival of our civilization. Don't ask, don't tell is a policy that has worked. It allows gays to serve in the military. It prevents elevating a Soldier's sexual preference above mission accomplishment and what is best for the military. Today, a gay, male Soldier can receive the Medal of Honor, reach the rank of General, and serve in any military occupation to which he is qualified. There are no restrictions placed upon him, other than the fact that he cannot announce his homosexuality. And why should he? Are gays so insecure in their sexual preferences that they must demand that others accept what, statistically, is deviant behavior? What benefit does the military derive in allowing open homosexuality? How does it make the military better, more effective, and stronger? If the answer is that it allows gays to feel better about themselves, then that is the wrong answer. The military is not about making gay or straight Soldiers feel better about themselves. It is about defending our nation. It should be about making our service members feel better about our nation. (But the Cult of Diversity, to which the homosexual debate belongs, has seriously damaged even this aspect of the military culture. See Gen. Casey's remarks after the Ft. Hood jihadist killed 13 people.) If the answer is that allowing open homosexuality does not make the military better, then we should not even be having this discussion. It is the topic of self-centered, immature "adults" who choose to identify themselves by a sexual act rather than the character and qualities that make a person, gay or straight, a truly responsible and mature citizen of this nation.
Warchick:
So I said it. I apologize for the length, but as you can tell, this issue seriously concerns me. Trash it if you want. Again, I did not mean to offend anyone. My concern is the effectiveness of our forces. This debate has nothing to do with improving the military. In fact, it is detrimental to the military...in my view. I would appreciate anonymity on this. Isn't it sad that I have to fear retribution for simply stating an opposing view to the gay lobby?
At ease, soldier…you did right, and we must NEVER apologize for truth, for if you are offended by truth, it is because you are on the wrong side of it. Our obligation is supposed to be to the truth, NOT politeness. ’Nuff said.
Keep the faith, bros, in all things courage, and no substitute for VICTORY.
Friday, June 04, 2010
Thursday, June 03, 2010
YouTube - Flotilla Choir presents: We Con the World
Coming to your TV whenever we want...pay no attention to the man behind the curtain!!!
Monday, May 31, 2010
The evidence is overwhelming!
...taking bets now as to how quickly mohammed's monsters claim the videos are doctored, or who cares, it's only the Jooz, or they were justified because we say so, etc., etc., etc.
Sick of this yet? FOR ZION!
Any questions? If so, you're stupid. Your dad should beat you until you get it...and yes, I mean that!
WARCHICK out
Sick of this yet? FOR ZION!
Any questions? If so, you're stupid. Your dad should beat you until you get it...and yes, I mean that!
WARCHICK out
I shall bless those that bless the...
And so it begins .............. Jews Being Hunted Down in Europe Over the Jihad Warship [Flotilla] Offensive - Atlas Shrugs
...and curse those that curse thee.
Bye bye Europe.
...and curse those that curse thee.
Bye bye Europe.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)