A woman speaks of Islam

Please disseminate!

READ AND WEEP FOR USA!  PRAY/PRAY/PRAY.

Nonie Darwish is real and widely published.  This is sobering and disturbing material.  Hard to figure how to deal with it.  Reminds me of the disastrous takeover of Afghanistan by Taliban with newly imposed sharia law.

 

Joys of Muslim Women

by Nonie Darwish

 

In the Muslim faith a Muslim man can marry a child as young as 1 year old and have sexual intimacy with this child. Consummating the marriage by 9.

 

The dowry is given to the family in exchange for the woman (who becomes his slave) and for the purchase of the private parts of the woman, to use her as a toy.

 

Even though a woman is abused she can not obtain a divorce.

 

To prove rape, the woman must have (4) male witnesses.

 

Often after a woman has been raped, she is returned to her family and the family must return the dowry. The family has the right to execute her (an honor killing) to restore the honor of the family. Husbands can beat their wives 'at will' and he does not have to say why he has beaten her.

 

The husband is permitted to have (4 wives) and a temporary wife for an hour (prostitute) at his discretion..

 

The Shariah Muslim law controls the private as well as the public life of the woman.

 

In the West World (America) Muslim men are starting to demand Shariah Law so the wife can not obtain a divorce and he can have full and complete control of her.  It is amazing and alarming how many of our sisters and daughters attending American Universities are now marrying Muslim men and submitting themselves and their children unsuspectingly to the Shariah law.

 

By passing this on, enlightened American women may avoid becoming a slave under 

Shariah Law.

 

Ripping the West in Two.

 

Author and lecturer Nonie Darwish says the goal of radical Islamists is to impose Shariah law on the world, ripping Western law and liberty in two.

 

She recently authored the book, Cruel and Usual Punishment: The Terrifying Global Implications of Islamic Law.

 

Darwish was born in Cairo and spent her childhood in Egypt and Gaza  before immigrating to America in 1978, when she was eight years old. Her father died while leading covert attacks on Israel. He was a high-ranking Egyptian military officer stationed with his family in Gaza .

 

When he died, he was considered a "shahid," a martyr for jihad. His posthumous status earned Nonie and her family an elevated position in Muslim society.

 

But Darwish developed a skeptical eye at an early age. She questioned her own Muslim culture and upbringing. She converted to Christianity after hearing a Christian preacher on television.

 

In her latest book, Darwish warns about creeping sharia law - what it is, what it means, and how it is manifested in Islamic countries.

 

For the West, she says radical Islamists are working to impose sharia on the world. If that happens, Western civilization will be destroyed. Westerners generally assume all religions encourage a respect for the dignity of each individual.  Islamic law (Sharia) teaches that non-Muslims should be subjugated or killed in this world.

 

Peace and prosperity for one's children is not as important as assuring that Islamic law rules everywhere in the Middle East and eventually in the world.

 

While Westerners tend to think that all religions encourage some form of the golden rule, Sharia teaches two systems of ethics - one for Muslims and another for non-Muslims. Building on tribal practices of the seventh century, Sharia encourages the side of humanity that wants to take from and subjugate others.

 

While Westerners tend to think in terms of religious people developing a personal understanding of and relationship with God, Sharia advocates executing people who ask difficult questions that could be interpreted as criticism.

 

It's hard to imagine, that in this day and age, Islamic scholars agree that those who criticize Islam or choose to stop being Muslim should be executed. Sadly, while talk of an Islamic reformation is common and even assumed by many in the West, such murmurings in the Middle East are silenced through intimidation.

 

While Westerners are accustomed to an increase in religious tolerance over time, Darwish explains how petro dollars are being used to grow an extremely intolerant form of political Islam in her native Egypt and elsewhere.

 

In twenty years there will be enough Muslim voters in the  U.S.  to elect the President by themselves! Rest assured they will do so... You can look at how they have taken over several towns in the USA.. Dearborn Mich. is one... and there are others...

 

I think everyone in the U.S. should be required to read this, but with the ACLU, there is no way this will be widely publicized, unless each of us sends it on!

 

It is too bad that so many are disillusioned with life and Christianity to accept Muslims as peaceful. Some may be but they have an army that is willing to shed blood in the name of Islam. The peaceful support the warriors with their finances and own kind of patriotism to their religion. While America is getting rid of Christianity from all public sites and erasing God from the lives of children the Muslims are planning a great jihad on America.

 

This is your chance to make a difference.. .! Pass it on to your email list or at least those you think will listen.

 

 

You heard the woman...git!

Git yours now...but not if you're white.

Racial Tension Mount At South Bay High School - News Story - KRXI Reno

Racial Tension Mount At South Bay High School - News Story - KRXI Reno


Since we seem determined to sink lower and lower, can't we grab some balls on the way down? Sheesh...we have been conquered not by battle, not by power, not even by words, but by the FEAR of words. Our enemies know this, and we keep reinforcing it with our silence. And we wonder how things got so out of control.

"Are there any men left in Washington, or are they all cowards?" Massoud, Afghan warrior, from Cyrus Nowrasteh's magnificent docum-drama THE PATH TO 911

The Silence Of Good Men - Teresa James ♪ :

There's Always Evil That Hides In This World
And Then The Evil Is Taught By The Silence Of Good Men
Silence Is Golden Or That's What They Say
So Good Men Stand Silent And All Of Us Betrayed
Always Impartial, Just Watching From The Side
Careful To Cover The Fears That They Might Hide
Don't Have To Tell Lies Or Reach A Helping Hand
Their Silence Speaks Across The Holy Land
Silence Is Golden Or That's What They Say
So Good Men Stand Silent And All Of Us Betrayed
There's Always Evil That Hides In This World
And Then The Evil Is Taught By The Silence Of Good Men.

MEN WHO ANSWERED THE "WHY?" The American Soldier

***In light of my friend, Keith Nation's loss, I have decided to re-post this one, the story that started me on my journey of the most Godly of all earthly beings:  The American soldier.***

***This article was originally written at the behest of MoH recipient Gen. Raymond Davis, USMC ret., and he had a segment of it run in Graybeards magazine two years ago.***


PFC Ricardo Carrasco is a name that I have determined will not fall into the anonymity of the abyss of time.


Why?


Well, I’m not sure I’m wise enough to answer such a simply complicated question, but I love a challenge and will at least make the attempt.


One would think that Ricardo’s story would be explanation enough. I agree; however, it sat for forty years collecting dust and slowly fading from memories. This disturbed me greatly. How could so perfect, so beautiful a sacrifice be forgotten?

Why?

I came to find out that it was forgotten because the full story had never been known in the first place. The truth of it was more stunning, more inspiring than anything man could have imagined.

Ricardo Carrasco arrived in Korea and landed on Old Baldy Hill in late March, 1953, just in time to join Company "A" of the 32nd Infantry Regiment of the 7th Division in a battle extraordinaire against Chinese Communist Forces. Baldy and its sister, the infamous Pork Chop Hill, would be his world for the next three months. He was 19, and had lived all of his life in El Paso, TX. Born during the depression and raised during WWII, Ricardo would cut his teeth on this first war against communism. He was the sixth of eight kids, and had wanted to be a career soldier like those men he had so admired in the newsreels of WWII. He received a terrible blow when he learned he could not be part of his beloved 82nd Airborne as he’d always dreamed; he was slightly nearsighted, and with no particular skills, was assigned to the infantry.

He was cocky at boot camp; his letters gently teasing friends back home for not volunteering like he had. But his first day in Korea knocked the macho right out of him. His letters home now begged friends not to join up. He was terrified and a million miles from those he loved. He wanted nothing more than to go home. He never could have imagined that the opportunity would present itself on a silver platter.

Director Owen Crump knew war. He had filmed much of WWII in the Army Air Corps and was a full-bird by the end of the war. However, something about this new war ate at him, and he finally realized what it was. They weren’t showing the whole picture. He wanted to do just that, but wasn’t sure how. His inspiration came in the form of a newspaper article written by Scripps-Howard war correspondent Jim Lucas. One simple line would instigate a movie: " It was a quiet day on the front with limited patrol action." Knowing war as he did, Crump knew there was no such thing as a "quiet day" for front-line soldiers. He wondered how those front-liners would write that line, and decided to do it for them. He had a revolutionary idea.
Crump approached Paramount Pictures producer Hal Wallis for help. He pitched his idea for the first movie ever filmed entirely on the front lines of a war. It would be in black and white to give it a documentary feel. Every soldier would be played by-of all things-a real front-line solder. No actors for this movie. Every explosion, every bullet would be the real, government-issued thing. Wallis loved the idea, and sent Crump and a skeletal crew to Korea to pick their men for the movie’s plot.

The movie was to be set on the last day of the war. A squad of 13 men, knowing that the cease fire would be declared that night, must still take a hill and set up an observation post. These are the most intense, most frightening moments of any war; everyone knows it’s over, but the bullets are still flying. Crump wanted to show the heartbreak of coming so close to the end, then dying anyway. He wanted the world to know the loss. One of the Americans in the fiction movie would die within hours of that cease fire.
Crump hand-picked his 13 American soldiers and one ROK soldier to play their parts. Among them was PFC Ricardo Carrasco. He would be the American to die in the movie.

Ricardo was livid at being chosen for the movie, but it was written up as a TDY, so he obeyed and went. He’d been squad leader when Crump had informed him of his new assignment, and he worried incessantly about his men. It was mid-June, 1953, and everyone knew the summer would out-live this war. It was over. But Ricardo knew of the Chinese desire to take Pork Chop, where he was fighting, and their habit of nighttime attacks. Every morning at the War Correspondents Building in Seoul-where the cast and crew were staying--he would run to a reporter and ask if the Chinese had attacked Pork Chop yet. Every night his prayers were the same: Please, God. Please don’t let the Chinese attack before I can get back. So far, he had been "lucky"-at least in his way of thinking. He knew that hill, and he knew the horror. The thought of his "fellahs," as he called them, fighting and dying while he was getting the star treatment sickened him. He felt that he was shirking his duties, letting down his friends. The war had become for Ricardo what it becomes for all good men: it was no longer about democracy, America, or even the damned hill-it was about his love for his friends. He could never live with himself if one of them died in his place or because he wasn’t there to help.
His love over-ruled his fear.

The rumors of Chinese amassing around Pork Chop flew as the filming began. Every day Ricardo begged Crump to "kill" his character off so he could get back to his fellahs. Every day Crump told him they weren’t ready to film that scene yet. The other soldier/actors puzzled over this quiet, moody young man who had the opportunity of a lifetime. They loved this life! Good food served to them on tablecloths, by waiters no less, plenty of booze, and no one trying to kill them. They could not figure the kid out.

Still he continued to pester the director, who firmly reminded him that he was to obey his orders. Crump liked the kid, but couldn’t reckon him. Maybe he loved the battle and terror, or maybe he was bucking for a promotion or a medal. Or maybe it was like he said; that his friends were up there. Crump figured the problem would be solved one day in early July when he received a wire from producer Hal Wallis. Wallis had seen the first rushes of the movie and had been so impressed by one young man in particular that he wanted Crump to get the boy to sign a contract with Paramount. Wallis knew a star when he saw one. In fact, in Hollywood he was referred to as "The Starmaker"; everyone he’d ever tagged to be a star had become one. And now he had Ricardo Carrasco pegged as the next star he would mold and create.

Crump grinned as he ordered Ricardo aside from the other men. As he explained that Hal Wallis wanted to make the young man a star, he held his breath and waited for the reaction: a yelp, weak knees, all the color draining from his face…something to indicate his shock and excitement. But Ricardo stood still, the only movement being that of his head slightly lowering. Crump furrowed his brow, but before he could say anything, Ricardo spoke.

"No thank you, sir."

Now it was Crump who lost all color. He asked for an explanation. How could this kid turn down such an incredible offer from the most powerful producer in Hollywood? And how the hell was he supposed to tell Wallis?

At first Ricardo skirted the question, simply saying that it was time to get back and they didn’t really need him here to make the movie, even though his part was a pivotal one. Crump could see that it was something else, and finally pried it out of the boy. Why did he want his character killed ahead of schedule? Why was he turning down once-in-a-lifetime opportunities to go back and fight in a war that would be over in a matter of days now? Why had he nagged the director from day one to get back to the mud and the digging and the fighting and the dying?

Why?

Ricardo’s voice was low and husky. After an eternity, he raised his head up and looked the director in the eye. He just had to go back. Crump had to let him go back. The director was angry now. Was the kid a martyr? Why was he beating a dead horse? Ricardo’s explanation would do little to quell his angst and frustration with this odd young man.

He told Crump that the men at the front were under his command. There was no hiding the tenderness he felt toward those men, or the responsibility. He pleaded with the director to let him go back and help his friends in the final battle he knew was brewing on Pork Chop. That was infinitely more important to him than a movie. The respect and safety of his fellahs meant so much more. He could not bear the thought of them up there, fighting and dying, while he was back in a safety zone being treated like royalty. It was not right.
Crump and Carrasco argued for the next hour. The director finally gave up and dismissed the private. He wired back to Hal Wallis that his offer had been declined.

Wallis was furious. He’d never been turned down before, especially not by a punk kid on some glory kick! But after he calmed down, he decided that since the war was going to be over soon, he’d give the boy a chance to serve his country and fulfill his sense of obligation; then he’d bring him home and make him Audy Murphy.

The young, lone private continued to ask the director to kill him off, in spite of that scene being about two weeks away. Crump finally gave up. They began shooting his death scene that same week, and finished the close-ups on the morning of July 6. Ricardo was enormously relieved when he learned that the Chinese had not yet made the rumored attack on Pork Chop, but he knew his luck would not hold for long. So that very afternoon he insisted on going back. Fellow actor Otis Wright drove the jeep, cussing Ricardo out the whole way for being a "damned fool." But Ricardo was quiet, only smiling or nodding his head, occasionally speaking of his mother. They arrived in the late afternoon; Ricardo turned to wave goodbye over his shoulder. His "luck" had held; he was back with his men before the final assault. He let out a sigh of relief. He’d made it back in time…but barely.

After darkness fell, Chinese Communist Forces began the final attack on Pork Chop Hill. It was brutal, and the cost for it would be high. So high, in fact, that American military leaders made a moral decision to pull off on July 10, only four days later.

It would not be in time for Ricardo. At about 2330 that night of July 6, a scant nine hours after wrapping up his movie death, a mortar round took out the left side of his head, wrapping up his life. Not many men can say they died twice in one day.

I don’t know what happened that night. Oh, I have the casualty report and some documentation. But what has made the past twelve years of research into this story so agonizing is that I’ve yet to find anyone who knew Ricardo and was with him that night. I must find someone. I must know if his going back made any difference to them that night. More importantly, I want them to know what Ricardo sacrificed to be there for them. Through my research and tracking down men, I have been astonished to learn that none of his fellow temporary thespians knew that he had been offered that contract from Wallis. I’m willing to bet that the men for whom he sacrificed such an opportunity do not know just how much he gave up to be there with them that night. I’ll bet they don’t know that he didn’t have to be there that night, wasn’t supposed to be there that night, and had nagged and pestered and "killed" himself off early so he could be there that night. I’ll bet they don’t know the eeriness of him dying in both "reel" life and "real" life, on the very same day. I’ll bet they don’t know that he did what he did out of his love and concern for them. I’ll bet they don’t know why.

"Cease Fire!", as it would be titled, came out in November of 1953 with its all- soldier cast. Most of the men were flown to the New York and Los Angeles premieres in high style. They appeared on Ed Sullivan and the Gary Moore Show. But Ricardo was rarely mentioned. Out of respect for the Carrasco family, Crump re-shot the death scene later using an extra. He knew that watching her son die on the screen would be too much for Mrs. Carrasco to bear. He also edited Ricardo out of as many places as he could in the film, but his part was too important. He could not be totally eliminated.

Mrs. Carrasco took it hard. In one of his last letters home discussing the making of the movie, Ricardo had written a line that now seemed ominous and foreboding: "Don’t worry when you see me die, Mom, it’s only acting." Her heart broke, and 18 months later, she, too died. She was only 47.
Paramount would be there to film Gen. Mark Clark signing the armistice only 21 days after Ricardo died. At one of their last meals together, the cast and crew of "Cease Fire!" raised their glasses to "the one who isn’t here." He was rarely mentioned thereafter.

Why?

Why would he go back to fight in a war that was over anyway? He had been under orders; no one would have thought less of him. In fact, no one had expected him back before the end of the war. They assumed when he was chosen in mid-June that he would be gone the rest of the summer. So why did he go back to fight in a war that was almost over, however tenuous that ending might be? Why would God allow one such as Ricardo to give up so much, but have his sacrifice virtually unknown by the very ones for whom he did everything? I’ve pondered that long and hard myself.

Why?

I once listened with great interest to a man explain his interpretation of Abraham’s sacrifice of Isaac. The question had been posed: If God is omniscient, then he knew what Abraham would do. He knew this faithful son loved Him more than even his own long-promised son, and would give him up at his Father’s command. Then why the test at all? Why did God ask Abraham to do what He already knew he would do?

Why?

Then came the answer that to me seemed so perfect, so beautiful in its simplicity that it had to be right. God had to prove to Abraham just how strong he was. It wasn’t that God doubted Abraham’s capability…it was that being mortal, Abraham doubted himself. Abraham had to know what Abraham could do. Like everything God does, it was not for His benefit, but for ours. I loved it! This was so very characteristic of our Father in Heaven…to show us, weak as we are, that we have within the seeds of godhood, Deity’s DNA. That we are capable of turning evil that we do or that is done against us into something divine is what makes us most like God; a "God Moment," as I often call magnanimous acts of mere mortal men.

This analogy is the warrior spirit defined. I have always felt that man is at his most spiritual when he is at war. Now this puzzles many who have heard me say this. Surely war is an evil, murderous event in our existence for which we are punished by God, right? How can it then also be good?

Why?

I have been studying the men of the Korean War for twelve years now. These valiant servants of both God and man hesitate to speak of what they’ve seen, what they’ve done. I have seen their tears, slow and trembling on the edge of graying eyelashes, slipping down care-worn cheeks as they recount their tales of war. I have strained to hear their voices, so low with the agony of this cross they bear. Many of their tears are for the brutality and horror inherent in war…the dead and mangled bodies of beloved friends, boys barely old enough to shave now forever frozen in time, never aging another moment in the memories of those who watched them die.

But what has touched me most is their anguish at what they hesitate to share…and that is the memories of what that war forced them to do. These gentle men, who lovingly cup the face of a child or make love with tenderness and sincerity to the woman they adore, sob over the clear and unforgiving images of those they were forced to kill. It is the memories of these long gone screams, these tears, this enemy pain that haunt them most as the years go by. For all of the hatred and anger they may have felt against the enemy, it is still a hard thing to kill another man. However they may have understood the need to kill the enemy, the need to win the war, the price they pay is still the greatest to bear. They did what they had to do, and would do it again if faced with it, but the price such action exacts from a tender soul is no small thing.

This is a most glorious testament to manhood and the warrior spirit…that they bear this arduous burden with quiet dignity so those they love won’t have to. The beauty of this selfless act leaves me in awe. I have long understood the willingness to die for a friend…after all, that is the epitome of what Christ did, and for which we mortals strive. He died that we might live. But those who must live with the memories not only of dead friends but butchered enemies are the closest we, as weak, wretched beings born into this veil of tears, can ever come to knowing what Christ bore. The memories of war are the price that the good man pays; it is out of his deep love for others that he spares them this particular agony. It is perhaps summed up best this way: Upon these two laws doth every commandment hinge-that we love God, and that we love each other. There is no better example on earth of this unconditional love than the American soldier. They would die for their friends, true, but even more heart-breaking and remarkable about such men is that they also live with what they’ve had to do.

The Korean War Veterans who went on to live instead of dying on that distant soil are acutely aware of such suffering. They came home to nothing-no "Thank you’s", no recognition-just nothingness. America acted as if the Korean War had never happened, in spite of it being the only war from the twentieth century that is still being waged. This was unimaginable to these men who had seen WWII and the honor bestowed upon their fathers, their older brothers, or even themselves. Their homeland wouldn’t even give them the decorum of calling their campaign a war. And yet it is a direct result of what they gave-and gave up-for what they believed and for those they loved that made possible my own existence. I sit and write today because of what they stood and gave yesterday.

Is the soldier man at his most base animal or most spiritual God? Is it the monster coming out in us, or the Deity weaving its way in? This is what I see when I look into the eyes of our warrior brethren. Thrown into the most horrifying concoction of man’s inhumanity to man, it is the fact that these mortals are capable of such unselfish, beautiful acts of humanity-no, Divinity-that reaches the heart and soul of those left behind in a dust-cloud of wonder. Of all God’s children, surely He must relate to and glory over the American soldier.

Why?

Greatest of all warriors on earth, the American soldier is capable of fighting fiercely, loving gently, living nobly, and forgiving totally. These are not the war-mongers that feminists and Hollywood have tried desperately to portray; these are gentle, loving creatures who want nothing more than to be free to go on living and loving. It is this desire that enables our brothers to choose to step out of their own selfish tendencies on behalf of another.

Why?

Just like with Abraham, God was showing Ricardo just how good, how magnificent he truly was capable of becoming. God was willing to sacrifice His son because He knew there were good men out there like Abraham and Ricardo-and most good soldiers--and he wanted them back with Him. Whether it requires dying for a friend or living with the memories, the order of the day for the American soldier is and always has been that of sacrifice. For them, "life, fortune, and sacred honor" are not only words. They know this meaning by their wounded hearts; no one has to tell them why.


For God's own, the HONOR GENERATIONS of the American Warrior.

Prayer for father and son, HONOR GENERATIONS

 A photo of Keith Allen Nations, part of HONOR GENERATIONS



Please say a prayer for my friend, Keith Allen Nations tonight. I wrote
an article about this amazing man several years ago. He served in both
Iraq and Afghanistan, three purple hearts and a silver star. He was
wounded so severely that he was evacked home. His son wanted
to be a "lifer" like dad, and joined up, going to Afghanistan a few
months ago. His dad emailed me yesterday...his son was killed in
Afghanistan, and he wanted to set up a time to tell me his son's story, a
part II to the story I did on him. His son will be buried in
Arlington, with his dad's purple hearts and silver star.


He was 22.

Psst! North Korea! Might want to consider NOT allowing Muslims near any towers...I'm just sayin'...

RC Delegate Leaves

Pyongyang, April 30 (KCNA) -- Massimo Barra, chairman of the Standing Commission of the Red Cross and Red Crescent, and his companion left here on Friday. During their stay in the DPRK they visited the old home in Mangyongdae where President Kim Il Sung was born and spent his childhood. They also visited the Tower of the Juche Idea, the Party Founding Memorial Tower and the Pyongyang Cultural Exhibition. Umm...Red Crescent?  There a big call for that in North Korea?  Helloooo?  Is this thing on?

Ummm....Hello? Anyone paying attention to this?

Islammunism caught in a sweet embrace yet again.  Can I get an "Awwwwwww?"


Doncha just love it when leaders from a non-existant Islamic nation play footsy with leaders from a non-UN recognized commie nation?  Makes ya feel all warm and fuzzy...or is that blistered and radioactive?

Kim Yong Nam Meets Palestinian Chief

Pyongyang, April 30 (KCNA) -- Kim Yong Nam, president of the Presidium of the DPRK Supreme People's Assembly, Friday met and had a talk with Mahmoud Abbas, chief of the Palestinian National Authority who is participating in the 2010 World Expo, in Shanghai. At the meeting Kim Yong Nam conveyed greetings General Secretary Kim Jong Il sent to the chief of the Palestinian National Authority. Mahmoud Abbas expressed deep thanks for this and asked Kim Yong Nam to convey his sincere and best wishes to Kim Jong Il. He said that the excellent relations of friendship between Palestine and the DPRK have been existed in the history and the Palestinian people regard the Korean people as closest friend. The two countries have right to enjoy more beautiful future, he said, expressing the will to continue developing the relations with the DPRK. Present there were Kim Song Gi, vice-minister of Foreign Affairs, and other officials concerned of the DPRK, Riad Al Malki, foreign minister, Hassan Abu Libdeh, minister of Finance, and Nabil Abu Rudaina, spokesman for the Presidential Office, of the Palestinian National Authority and the Palestinian ambassador to the DPRK. "Kumbaya, ma Lord, Kumbaya....!" (If by "Kumbaya" you mean "Oh HELL no!" then yes, by all means, "Kumbaya.")

TEA PARTY, MEET THE TEQUILA PARTY The Rule of Law vs. the Law of Rule

By:  Resa LaRu Kirkland

One party shouted chants, the other shouted profanities.  One party questioned with boldness, the other grabbed its crotch.  One party spoke with clarity, courage, and the Constitution, the other threw bottles and food at the policemen who were there to protect them.

One party flew the American flag with joy, the other flew the Mexican flag with menace.

Yep, we are now a two-party people:  The pro-American Tea Party, and the anti-American Tequila Party.

Arizona had the nerve to pass a law upholding the rule of law because the Federal agencies, WHOSE JOB THIS WAS, had failed to do so for decades.  Arizona passed DefCon 5 on the illegal question back in the 80’s but continued to hold on to the fantasy that the Feds would actually do their job.  When once again Big Government failed, they stepped up and took responsibility for their own state, showing that their “THAT IS IT!” moment was long overdue and snapping shut the American purse on those who weren’t American nor law-abiding.

And after decades of doing nothing, suddenly now AG Eric Holder is studying what is going on in Arizona.  Only when Arizona showed they would handle things themselves, without the Big Government who had so utterly failed them, did they deem them worthy of their attention.

But then, haven’t we come to expect that from the arrogant, drunken frat boy tactics of this administration?  Is it any wonder that the aptly-named Tequila Party supports him?  After all, watch the news; their tactics are one and the same, and by their fruits ye shall know them.

And I’m not talking lime, either.

Arizona Republican Gov. Jan Brewer signed a bill Friday to give state police the authority to question whether an individual is in the United States legally and would consider it a crime for people to be unlawfully in the state. She said she was forced to act because Washington has failed to stop the flow of illegal immigrants and drugs from Mexico.

Opponents of the law, who have staged protests in the state capital of Phoenix since last week, used refried beans to smear swastikas on the state Capitol and have demanded a boycott of the state, have said they want to take the case to court for a judge to decide whether the state can enforce federal laws.  Fox News, April 27, 2010


Refried beans; yeah, they’re not stereotypes!

Is this our country or isn’t it?  It is literally against the law to come to this country without following the rules, and has been for over a century now.  My forefathers had to check in at Ellis Island, have a skill, a place to live, a plan for their lives here, they had to be free of disease or quarantined until they were safe, they had to be free of a criminal record, learn English, swear allegiance, know our history, and be an asset to the land, not a millstone around its neck.
We either have the Rule of Law or we have the Law of Rule, that is, he who rules makes whatever law he damned well wants to make.  Our fore-fathers followed the laws and were happy to do so, for they knew there was security in creating a unified country whose members played by the same rules and were subject to the same laws.  All we have now is splintered favoritism, and the only rule for being part of the favored groups is apparently how many laws you’re willing to rape.

Yet the current crop of illegals think it’s somehow different for them, that they shouldn’t have to follow the same rules that the ancestors of white Americans had to follow.  They believe they should be exempt.

And we’re the arrogant ones?

Keep the faith, bros, in all things courage, and no substitute for VICTORY.


***Tequila Party:  Those who believe they are exempt from the laws of the land they demand to be included in and given all benefits meant for the legal citizens, but not pay taxes or have to follow any of the laws/rules already established in said country they are desperate to be a part of; the antithesis of the Tea Party.***

My Letter to a Moron--Usually I don't bother, but, well....

RE:  http://www.etherzone.com/2010/scall042310.shtml

"Obama is the first non-white President of the United States and conservatives who make up a majority of tea partiers tend to be overwhelmingly white..."

The country over which O is Prez is overwhelmingly white.  THAT is a mathematical truth.  But since when did these facts preclude others from knowing what the hell they were talking about? 

So we know for sure you failed math, now on to history...

"The same government protected black slavery" --  But fortunately, REPUBLICANS wrote the law and towed the line that freed them--paid for overwhelmingly with the lives of young WHITE men.  Can you name me a war where blacks fought and died to free their own white slaves in their own homeland, hmmm?  Nope; only whites did that, and overwhelmingly Republican whites at that.

"There’s plenty on the record to protest regardless of one’s race." --  Really?  Then doesn't logic dictate you focus on the plenty, or the MAJORITY, rather than the MINORITY?  Sheesh, look who I'm talking to!

"Could not one consider the Black Panthers a "militia?" and were they not formed for largely the same reason: to protect neighborhoods and communities from what they felt were unlawful conduct by law enforcement, federal or local? What’s the difference?" --  Wow...even for you this is a new low.  Clearly you know NOTHING about the evils of the Black Panthers, whose stated purpose was to overthrow American government with violence and guerilla warfare (might want to read what number 3 man in the Panthers, Eldridge Cleaver, wrote about going to Communist countries to learn guerilla warfare.  He might have something to say about their plans), and who repeatedly SCREAMED the superiority of blacks and inferiority of whites. (But that's not racist, right?)  Betcha I could find some old school Cats who would just loooooove to have you over for a bake sale and educate you on "neighborhood protection."  In fact, let's call David Horowitz and see if he can arrange it.  That might be a bit touchy for him, though.  Trouble is, last time he recommended a woman to them--she was a black bookkeeper who found discrepancies regarding money for drugs, hookers, etc., and showed them to Horowitz, who referred her to Bobby Seals about what he was sure was "just a mistake"--she was found butchered.  Helluva coinkidink for some kindly, non-menacing, best of intention neighborhood watch types, doncha think?  Is THAT the group you're comparing the Tea Party to?  My God, boy...slap your parents and fire your teachers, 'cause they done failed you.

"This is one of the many challenges the Tea Partiers face, from co-optation by the establishment Right, (Tea Party is overwhelmingly conservative, dickless, and since you were educated under the NEA, that means the right hand, baby boy) demonization from the Left (yeah, that JUST began with the tea party.  Guess you were still in diapers 18 months ago during the HATE BUSH finale) and at times its own incoherence as to what its larger goals are."(You are the only person on the left who hasn't gotten it; even Al Sharpton made a reasonably coherent summation; I know, because hell froze over and his feet got stuck.  Took 25 18 wheelers to get him out again--you could hear swear words and smell Teamsters for days after that.  Guess that makes you the LEAD LOSER of the LEFT.  Congratulations, your majesty.  You make a lovely Queen.)

Why is it that the only ones who EVER bring up race are Politically Castrated leftist losers with castration complex (of course, since they are, after all, PC--Politically Castrated)?  If the right is so "racist," why is the left the ONLY ones to EVER bring race into the argument?  Not one time have ANY of the demonstrations talked about race,not by the Tea Partiers anyway.  By definition, then, since the left views everything through the race window, the left is horrifically racist.  That includes you, limp-dick.

"Only by making themselves bigger and broader can they avoid all this and they can make themselves more politically potent."  Psst...I don't want to humiliate you any further than your poor cognition has done, but O's poll numbers support US, not HIM.  Sounds like BROAD support to this broad.

If you're going to speak fluently about history, you might want to at LEAST study a little outside the halls of the catastrophic American education system (Don't even try; my degree is in Education)  Remain mute and stop removing all the merciful doubt people kindly bestow upon the silent.  But if you aren't going to do that, at least try to gain some testicular fortitude and reach beyond the Hippy Press taglines.  I have a pair you can borrow, but I'd recommend starting with something a bit smaller; go too big all at once and your ass will fall in.

Bob, Kevin, and Sean, anything you might like to add to enlighten the little piss ant?  Or would you rather just mail pics to the race-obsessed big boy wanna-be, since apparently all that white on his TV screen gave him snow-blindness and he missed out on the hundreds of blacks, hispanics, asians, indians, etc., who attend these events?  Your call.

Keep the faith, bros, in all things courage, and no substitute for VICTORY!

--SO SAYS WARCHICK, Resa LaRu Kirkland
Columnist/Writer/Speaker/Military Historian/The Anti-Feminist!
Agree with RESA at twitter.com/WARCHICKUSA, SmartGirlPolitics, Facebook, MySpace, and americaswarchick.blogspot.com.
Hippies, commies, and femmies opinions altered here!!
STAND WITH ISRAEL!  FREE NORTH KOREA!!
POW/MIA:  Bring them home or send us back!

My Letter to a Moron--Usually I don't bother, but, well....

RE:  http://www.etherzone.com/2010/scall042310.shtml

"Obama is the first non-white President of the United States and conservatives who make up a majority of tea partiers tend to be overwhelmingly white..."

The country over which O is Prez is overwhelmingly white.  THAT is a mathematical truth.  But since when did these facts preclude others from knowing what the hell they were talking about? 

So we know for sure you failed math, now on to history...

"The same government protected black slavery" --  But fortunately, REPUBLICANS wrote the law and towed the line that freed them--paid for overwhelmingly with the lives of young WHITE men.  Can you name me a war where blacks fought and died to free their own white slaves in their own homeland, hmmm?  Nope; only whites did that, and overwhelmingly Republican whites at that.

"There’s plenty on the record to protest regardless of one’s race." --  Really?  Then doesn't logic dictate you focus on the plenty, or the MAJORITY, rather than the MINORITY?  Sheesh, look who I'm talking to!

"Could not one consider the Black Panthers a "militia?" and were they not formed for largely the same reason: to protect neighborhoods and communities from what they felt were unlawful conduct by law enforcement, federal or local? What’s the difference?" --  Wow...even for you this is a new low.  Clearly you know NOTHING about the evils of the Black Panthers, whose stated purpose was to overthrow American government with violence and guerilla warfare (might want to read what number 3 man in the Panthers, Eldridge Cleaver, wrote about going to Communist countries to learn guerilla warfare.  He might have something to say about their plans), and who repeatedly SCREAMED the superiority of blacks and inferiority of whites. (But that's not racist, right?)  Betcha I could find some old school Cats who would just loooooove to have you over for a bake sale and educate you on "neighborhood protection."  In fact, let's call David Horowitz and see if he can arrange it.  That might be a bit touchy for him, though.  Trouble is, last time he recommended a woman to them--she was a black bookkeeper who found discrepancies regarding money for drugs, hookers, etc., and showed them to Horowitz, who referred her to Bobby Seals about what he was sure was "just a mistake"--she was found butchered.  Helluva coinkidink for some kindly, non-menacing, best of intention neighborhood watch types, doncha think?  Is THAT the group you're comparing the Tea Party to?  My God, boy...slap your parents and fire your teachers, 'cause they done failed you.

"This is one of the many challenges the Tea Partiers face, from co-optation by the establishment Right, (Tea Party is overwhelmingly conservative, dickless, and since you were educated under the NEA, that means the right hand, baby boy) demonization from the Left (yeah, that JUST began with the tea party.  Guess you were still in diapers 18 months ago during the HATE BUSH finale) and at times its own incoherence as to what its larger goals are."(You are the only person on the left who hasn't gotten it; even Al Sharpton made a reasonably coherent summation; I know, because hell froze over and his feet got stuck.  Took 25 18 wheelers to get him out again--you could hear swear words and smell Teamsters for days after that.  Guess that makes you the LEAD LOSER of the LEFT.  Congratulations, your majesty.  You make a lovely Queen.)

Why is it that the only ones who EVER bring up race are Politically Castrated leftist losers with castration complex (of course, since they are, after all, PC--Politically Castrated)?  If the right is so "racist," why is the left the ONLY ones to EVER bring race into the argument?  Not one time have ANY of the demonstrations talked about race,not by the Tea Partiers anyway.  By definition, then, since the left views everything through the race window, the left is horrifically racist.  That includes you, limp-dick.

"Only by making themselves bigger and broader can they avoid all this and they can make themselves more politically potent."  Psst...I don't want to humiliate you any further than your poor cognition has done, but O's poll numbers support US, not HIM.  Sounds like BROAD support to this broad.

If you're going to speak fluently about history, you might want to at LEAST study a little outside the halls of the catastrophic American education system (Don't even try; my degree is in Education)  Remain mute and stop removing all the merciful doubt people kindly bestow upon the silent.  But if you aren't going to do that, at least try to gain some testicular fortitude and reach beyond the Hippy Press taglines.  I have a pair you can borrow, but I'd recommend starting with something a bit smaller; go too big all at once and your ass will fall in.

Bob, Kevin, and Sean, anything you might like to add to enlighten the little piss ant?  Or would you rather just mail pics to the race-obsessed big boy wanna-be, since apparently all that white on his TV screen gave him snow-blindness and he missed out on the hundreds of blacks, hispanics, asians, indians, etc., who attend these events?  Your call.

Keep the faith, bros, in all things courage, and no substitute for VICTORY!

--SO SAYS WARCHICK, Resa LaRu Kirkland
Columnist/Writer/Speaker/Military Historian/The Anti-Feminist!
Agree with RESA at twitter.com/WARCHICKUSA, SmartGirlPolitics, Facebook, MySpace, and americaswarchick.blogspot.com.
Hippies, commies, and femmies opinions altered here!!
STAND WITH ISRAEL!  FREE NORTH KOREA!!
POW/MIA:  Bring them home or send us back!

Need I say more? I need NOT!

Suing Muhammad - Atlas Shrugs

Oh love it! Everyone who has been hurt by Mohammedism, as our Founding Fathers referred to it, should follow suit -- WARCHICK

Suing Muhammad - Atlas Shrugs

Remember in NOVEMBER!!!!

World Jewish Congress Pres Ronald Lauder Stands up to Obama | One Jerusalem :: Israel News & Analysis

World Jewish Congress Pres Ronald Lauder Stands up to Obama | One Jerusalem :: Israel News & Analysis



Anyone else have that top of the roller coaster feeling?

Bring it on, O...better men (and women!) for that matter have tried taking on the God of Israel. My bet is on the ash pile smite, always a classic, but part of me is hoping for the rarely used but oh-so-satisfying pillar of salt smite.

Readers?

We're all North Koreans now...

From the April 2, 2010 edition of Korean Central News Agency, North Korea's ONLY newspaper. The rhetoric and fantasy can be hard to take, especially when these stir-fried Stalinists brag on the communist word before we get a chance to enact it here.


30th Anniversary of Public Health Law Marked


Pyongyang, April 2 (KCNA) -- A meeting took place at the Central Hall of Workers on Friday to mark the 30th anniversary of the promulgation of the Public Health Law thanks to President Kim Il Sung.

The participants heard the recorded historic speech "Let Us Implement the Public Health Law to the Letter" made by the President at the Fourth Session of the Sixth Supreme People's Assembly of the DPRK on April 4, Juche 69 (1980).


Vice-Premier of the DPRK Cabinet O Su Yong said in his report that Kim Il Sung made sure that the above-said public health law was adopted at the Fourth Session of the Sixth SPA and made public a work indicating tasks and ways for implementing it, adding that this was an event of great historical significance in carrying out the Juche-oriented cause of public health.


The Public Health Law which comprehensively deals with popular health policies of the Workers' Party of Korea and the state is a Juche-oriented public health charter which provides a legal guarantee for all principles and requirements for freeing the working people from all diseases once and for all and promoting their health, he noted.


He referred to the fact that Kim Jong Il has energetically led the drive for defending the Juche-oriented idea and theory of public health and bringing about a new turn in the health service.


The reporter recalled that Kim Jong Il provided a national meeting of public health workers and sent the historic letter "On the Further Improvement of the Health Service" to its participants in April, Juche 74 (1985), clearly indicating tasks and ways for further developing the health service, and saw to it that various new laws were instituted to provide a legal guarantee for the health service.


The reporter stressed that under the wise leadership of the President and Kim Jong Il great successes have been made in the public health service and the advantages and vitality of the law have been fully demonstrated over the last three decades.


Pointing out that the true nature of socialism lies in prioritizing the people's wellbeing and regarding it as absolute, the reporter called on the public health workers to thoroughly implement the above-said law so that the benefits of the Party and the state may perfectly reach the working people.


It was attended by Choe Thae Bok, secretary of the Central Committee of the WPK, officials concerned and exemplary public health workers.

IT’S HARD TO BRING HOME THE BACON… With All These Pigs at the Trough

From 1789 to 1815 Congressmen received $6.00 daily, but only on the days they showed up. From 1815 to 1855 Congressmen received a modest salary, compared to the massive salaries of the Congressmen today. In 1855 their salaries increased to $3,000 annually. Then in 1865 they gave themselves a 66% increase to $5,000 annually. 6 years later they boosted their salaries another 50% to $7,500 per year. The American People became so outraged by the greed that congressmen were showing, that congress was forced to take a 33% pay cut, which lasted 34 years until 1907, at which time they gave themselves another 50% increase back to $7,500 annually. They took two other pay cuts, both of which were during the Great Depression, for a total of 15%. These are the only 3 times in American History that any Congressmen have ever taken salary cuts.

In 1935, Congress voted themselves a 19% increase, then they didn't receive another pay raise until 12 years later, when they gave themselves a 25% increase in 1947. In 1955 Congress gave themselves a whopping 80% increase. In the years 1987, and 1991 Congress received 2 raises per year. 3% + 20% in 1987, and 4% and 25% in 1991. Within the last 10 years Congress has raised their salaries 8 times for a total of 26%. While the lowest paid American Workers have only received 1 raise within the last 10 years.

In the last 25 years Congress has seen 18 salary increases totalling 277%. While the lowest paid American Workers have only seen 5 wage increases in 25 years totalling a mere 166%. In the last 25 years the cost of living has increased 251%. The Minimum Wage has not been increased since 1997. While Congressmen's pay has increased 8 out of the last 10 years. – Walter Dimmock, US Congress Salary History.

It has long bothered me that those who work for us, those we “hire” to represent us in this Republic, make about four times the salary of the average American. I mean, how many jobs out there do you know of where the workers make many times more than their bosses?

The job of running this country is supposed to be a civil job; in other words, “for the people.” Civil jobs are jobs of duty and sacrifice, and were never intended to be jobs of profit, high society, prestige, fame, celebrity, and gluttony. They were also meant to be temporary, lest a man lose his vigilance, forget his duties, grow weary in service, arrogant in power, or deny others the privilege and responsibility of service on behalf of their fellow American.

It was for this reason that our Founding Fathers lived off the labor of their own hands, so as not to be a burden to the people they were supposed to be serving. It is why their pay was originally only stipends, compensation for the expenses and time they accrued in service of their country, and ONLY for the days they were actually engaged in civil work (what a concept!). They were NOT politicians; they were farmers, soldiers, businessmen, inventors, industrialists, etc. They despised the thought of professional politicians, or politics dominated by one profession as opposed to a cross section of American reality. They knew full well that it was not the government that created or built up nations and economies, but the people. The government’s job was to protect and defend those freedoms and rights that enabled their bosses to build the nation.

On becoming a public man he made a resolution “never to engage, while in public office, in any kind of enterprise for the improvement of my fortune, nor to wear any other character than that of a farmer.” On the close of his public career of nearly half a century, he could say that he had kept this resolution. – Third President of the United States, Thomas Jefferson

Jefferson wisely knew that if the office of an elected official was a sweet deal, men would inevitably seek positions of power for the want of filthy lucre, viewing the job as an asset to his pocketbook and a boost to his resume rather than an obligation that he is willing to take upon himself to uphold and defend the ideals of this land.

I thought about this last week when I came upon an article that brought to sharp focus just how far we’ve drifted from what America is supposed to be.

Raoul Contreras wrote Feeding at the Public Trough, an article that left me both shaken and shaking, mostly because it involves a supposedly conservative candidate who is borrowing from the Communist Playbook of word manipulation to mask his larceny.

He writes: “(H)e is Republican California State Senator George Runner (Republican-17th District) and his wife, former elected Assembly woman Sharon Runner who double-dipped over $200,000 just between 2005 and 2008 according to The California Assembly Rules Committee and the California State Senate Daily File. While wife Sharon has left the Assembly under the term limits law, Senator Runner is still in office and, in fact, is running for another office now that he is termed out of the Senate.

“Senator Runner and his wife represented districts in the Greater Los Angeles Area. The Legislature pays a "per diem" to cover member "Sacramento session living expenses while away from home." In this case, the capitol is 400 miles from their home. The current individual per diem rate is $141.86 per day, tax free if the member lives away from Sacramento.

“Senator Runner and Assembly member Sharon Runner presumably shared the same residence in Sacramento while in session, while they were collecting their tax free $283.72 per day, plus state supplied cars at $500 per month each. While they were collecting their double-dipped per diem payments and car allowances they cashed their salaries of $95,200 (before December, 2009, it was $116,000) each for total annual pay of $190,582.

“Adding the Runners’ annual pay of $190,582 (it was higher -- $232,000 - when Mrs. Runner served in the assembly) and their $283.72 daily “per diem” Mr. and Mrs. Runner averaged over $300,000 a year between 2005 and 2008. During that time, Mr. and Mrs. Central-San Joaquin Valley farm worker earned an average of $31,313, if both worked on a farm – one tenth of double-dipping elected public servants Mr. and Mrs. George Runner.

“…(T)he very idea that another engorged political couple can even think of extending their years at the “Public Trough” it is my duty to scream about the giant rip-off that Senator Runner and his wife promulgated on the people of California.

“Their double-dipping at the Public Trough was and is disgraceful. His politically inspired chameleon-like change from “Full Time Legislator” to “tax payer advocate” in an attempt to fool Republican voters of the 2nd District of the California Board of Equalization in the upcoming June Primary is disgraceful, dishonest and pure political chicanery.”

One more point before I start hearing the whiny justification that we must pay high salaries to attract the best people. Civil jobs are jobs of service, and elected officials are NOT the CEO’s of private companies whose products/services are funded by the choice of the people rather than force of the IRS. We “hire” our elected officials for “jobs” that are meant to be difficult, challenging duties of responsibility and obligation, NOT to appeal to those who are accustomed to the finer things in life, but to weed out those for whom the finer things are an end justified by any means. In their boundless wisdom our Founders understood the ability of money to corrupt even the best of men, and pledged all they had to ensure their beloved America be led by men whose motives are pure and humble, be they in DC or city hall.

And we wonder why leaders in Washington are so arrogantly defying their “bosses” on what we want and don’t want. Failing close to home ultimately echoes nationwide, and as they say, “All politics is local.”

Or is that loco? Well, you tell me; with Americans struggling to bring home the bacon, why are we still feeding this pig?

Keep the faith, bros, in all things courage, and no substitute for VICTORY.

Zieg Heil, Black Devil

March 23, 1933 - Reichstag passes Enabling Act

They DID save Hitler's brain, and put it in a Black Ass!  Copying and printing here so it won't "disappear" from the provided link.



Hitler's Enabling Act

On March 23, 1933, the newly elected members of the German Parliament (the Reichstag) met in the Kroll Opera House in Berlin to consider passing Hitler's Enabling Act. It was officially called the 'Law for Removing the Distress of the People and the Reich.' If passed, it would effectively mean the end of democracy in Germany and establish the legal dictatorship of Adolf Hitler.
The 'distress' had been secretly caused by the Nazis themselves in order to create a crisis atmosphere that would make the law seem necessary to restore order. On February 27, 1933, they had burned the Reichstag building, seat of the German government, causing panic and outrage. The Nazis successfully blamed the fire on the Communists and claimed it marked the beginning of a widespread uprising.
On the day of the vote, Nazi storm troopers gathered in a show of force around the opera house chanting, "Full powers - or else! We want the bill - or fire and murder!!" They also stood inside in the hallways, and even lined the aisles where the vote would take place, glaring menacingly at anyone who might oppose Hitler's will.
Just before the vote, Hitler made a speech to the Reichstag in which he pledged to use restraint.
"The government will make use of these powers only insofar as they are essential for carrying out vitally necessary measures...The number of cases in which an internal necessity exists for having recourse to such a law is in itself a limited one." - Hitler told the Reichstag.
He also promised an end to unemployment and pledged to promote peace with France, Great Britain and the Soviet Union. But in order to do all this, Hitler said, he first needed the Enabling Act.
A two thirds majority was needed, since the law would actually alter the German constitution. Hitler needed 31 non-Nazi votes to pass it. He got those votes from the Center Party after making a false promise to restore some basic rights already taken away by decree.
However, one man arose amid the overwhelming might. Otto Wells, leader of the Social Democrats stood up and spoke quietly to Hitler.
"We German Social Democrats pledge ourselves solemnly in this historic hour to the principles of humanity and justice, of freedom and socialism. No enabling act can give you power to destroy ideas which are eternal and indestructible."
This enraged Hitler and he jumped up to respond.
"You are no longer needed! - The star of Germany will rise and yours will sink! Your death knell has sounded!"
The vote was taken - 441 for, only 84, the Social Democrats, against. The Nazis leapt to their feet clapping, stamping and shouting, then broke into the Nazi anthem, the Hörst Wessel song.
They achieved what Hitler had wanted for years - to tear down the German Democratic Republic legally and end democracy, thus paving the way for a complete Nazi takeover of Germany.
From this day on, the Reichstag would be just a sounding board, a cheering section for Hitler's pronouncements.

Copyright © 1996 The History Place™ All Rights Reserved

Sound Familiar????  If it doesn't, turn up your hearing aid and borrow a brain...but not Hitler's.  O took that one already.  The rest of Hitler must be rolling in it's Soviet grave...his brain in a non-Aryan!  Oy vey!

She has my vote for Woman of the Year!

Joe Kaufman is my friend...get this SOB! WARCHICK

Americans Against Hate

I wann go! Waaaaaaa!

Call to Arms: Join Me in DC Saturday to Stop ObamaCare

WARCHICK bumper sticker--let me know if you think they would sell!

**Copyrighted, folks, so don't even think about it!***

I'd rather have MEDICAL BILLS than this MEDICAL BILL!

If you're interested in buying, let me know.  And spread the word!!  ---  WARCHICK

Article I wrote 5 1/2 years ago...seems very appropriate now

LESSONS LEARNED ARE LOST ON THE LEFT... THE YELLOWSTONE BEARS

Pelosi breaking Constitution; Trying to pass healthcare WITHOUT vote

Unconstitutional, illegal, immoral, and outrageous. THIS MUST NOT BE! This is the work of a TOTALitarian DICtator.

Saturday night thoughts on Government-run ANYTHING!

We're about to trust people who can't even handle MAIL with our favorite MALES?  Really?

Let me tell you what these faggoty assholes did to one of MY favorite MALES.

Congress has been raiding SS for decades now, an act that was UNCONSTITUTIONAL as well as illegal.  Then, they raided the Federal Workers' retirement accounts, turning around and slapping them with Double Taxation.

Let me 'splain.

My dad was a Federal Parole and Probation officer beginning in 1973 until 1993.  They lured him away from his job as Deputy Director of the Job Corps in Cottonwood, ID, in 1973 to move to El Paso, TX, with the promise that all the money he put away for retirement would be AFTER TAXES.  The amount he put away would leave him with a lump sum of $50,000 when he retired. 

By the 1980's, Congress apparently had run out of funds for their alcohol and prostitute bills.  Social Security was already empty and their leacherous, glutonous eyes fell upon the Federal Workers' Retirement Fund.  Ah!  More of The Peoples' money!  So they decided to pass a law stating that the money the Federal Workers had been carefully socking away for retirement wasn't actually their money, it only represented their money, and therefore had to be taxed AGAIN (That's double taxation, folks, which is UNCONSTITUTIONAL!) upon withdrawal at retirement.  The Federal Workers took it all the way to the Supreme Court in 1993, just before my dad retired.  Since Congress had snuck it into law, the SC could only uphold the law that was stinkin' up the books.

When my dad retired, he lost over $22,000 to the unConstitutional double taxation.  His entire plan for the future was blown out of the water, as since he didn't hand the chunk of illegal money over to the illegal law, he was taxed into oblivion by the constant IRS fines, penalties, and monthly payments that didn't even touch what he now "owed."  He died 5 years ago an untterly broken man, losing a house he'd paid on for 25 years and leaving my mom with next to nothing. 

He had never dreamed his government would lie to him and steal from him.  He had loved being Deputy Director of the Job Corps, and had only taken the Probation job BECAUSE of that retirement plan, and they stole it anyway.  He adored this nation, served in Korean War, and for it was utterly robbed, lied to, and destroyed. 

THAT is what we have allowed our "leaders" to become--the greatest liars, thieves, pigs and narcississtic Satanic Bowel Movements the world could create.  And we did it without so much as a whimper.

There are consequences for actions, and worst of all, consequences for inaction.  Behold what inaction hath wrought.

Ever since the field of elected officials has been dominated by one profession (that of LAWYERS!) we have slowly seen our rights and our MONEY disappear.  There is a reason that the only profession specifically named and consistently given warning to in the Old Testament, New Testament, Book of Mormon, and Doctrine and Covenants isn't bakers, soldiers, business men, farmers, or even clergy---IT IS LAWYERS.

The Founding Father's NEVER intended for any particular profession to dominate leadership for this very reason, but of all the ones we could have allowed, history has proven that LAWYERS are the most vile, most repugnant, most dangerous, most evil, and MOST DEFINITELY NO!

God forgive us...what have we DONE?

----WARCHICK

ALL FIRED UP! w/ Lori and Bea

ALL FIRED UP! w/ Lori and Bea

Listened to this show and bawled like a baby! She's like me and my devotion to the men of the Korean War, especially Ricardo Carrasco. Oh Please, people....listen and support Betty Kilbride in her honorable work!

Here is her site. Let's try to get STAGE RIGHT and Jack Marino to bring her on...oh people...does my old heart good that my SISTAHS are all over this!

The magnificent American Warrior...never been men like it, and if we lose them, there never will be again. To ARMS! --- WARCHICK

From Breitbart...OUTRAGE!

Accept no evil, leave no doubt!


Read the BigGovernment article by Jim Hoft here





 Apparently, the Black Pussy Cats who threatened voters have litters everywhere. Remember this?

Are you as sick and offended by MSNBC as I am?

I think they go to rehab and psych ward every month for new talent...WOW.