First September, then November: Private online viewing of the Clinton-censored THE PATH TO 911

SPREAD EVERYWHERE, STAND UP BEFORE IT'S TOO LATE!!!

Remember this?




Well, enough freakin' talk.  I AM HAVING A MASS ONLINE VIEWING OF...DEEP BREATH....THE PATH TO 911, IN SEPTEMBER, 2 MONTHS BEFORE THE ELECTION.


Here's some info, details still in final stages!




I've made 3 trailers for it to remind people and get them angry.  This is 2 months before the election...I want people to remember what happens when COWARDS LEAD!


Cyrus has said that so long as he is stateside or has access to a reliable internet connection that he will join us for the viewings, which will be over 2 nights because it is a 5 1/2 hour docudrama.  He is delighted to have a question/answer period after each night.  John Ziegler, who made a documentary about what happened entitled BLOCKING THE PATH TO 911, has said he would join us if we could get someone like Sean Hannity or Glenn Beck to be involved. 




 I am NOT afraid of the Clintons or Disney, let them bluster and blow, THIS IS IMPORTANT.  We do NOT censor in America, and this is THE definitive docudrama on 9/11, beginning with the WTC bombings in 1993. 




 The reason the Clintons are so upset and demanded this not be shown is because it demonstrates 1 of about 13 opportunities they had to get Bin Laden in the 90's--before the African Embassies, before the USS Cole, and of course, long before 9/11--and how they were too nutless to make the call.  (It's the reason Sandy Berger stole official documents and destroyed them; those documents showed the failed opportunities to get Bin Laden, and he knew there would be hell to pay for the Clintons and himself if the 9/11 commission had access to them!)  They did air the show, but cut out that particular scene, and then of course refused to every show it again or release it on DVD. 




 The copy Cyrus gave to me, however, has that scene in it, and it WILL be included.  I figured we could get people to tweet about it while watching using the hashtag #ThePathTo911 and get it trending...perhaps we could headquarter the viewing in NYC the week of the anniversary and invite Guiliani, the Bushes, etc. to be in the audience.  


Past write-ups about this outrageous traitorous and un-Constitutional behavior:


Disney and the Path To 911

Learn about John O'Neill

Big Hollywood write-up on The Path To 911 viewing

Hollywood's Deliberate Re-Writing Of History

Daily Caller Covers Disneys' and Clintons' Rape of Free Speech

Trying Men's Souls and The Mouse That Silenced




Here are the three trailers I've made, they are up on youtube:



We must not allow iron-fisted Totalitarianism even 1 inch in this land; as a studier of military history, I know that no country that has ever tolerated a little has EVER remained free.  Not a single one.  We are not above the laws of math (patterns); we must get the people outraged, and I believe knowing what people like the Clintons and Obama (cut from the same commie cloth) have done will be the best indicator for what they will do. 




 Please don't let the Igers, Clintons, and Obamas of the world shut us up.  If they succeed now it will be decades before our great-grandchildren will ever be free again.




 Keep the faith, bros, in all things courage, and no substitute for VICTORY!

Latest trailer for the mass private online viewing of THE PATH TO 911! Protest censorship of our history!

Hollywood's deliberate re-writing of history by the incomparable Mark Tapson

Incredible write-up by Hollywood's malpractice on 9/11 by intellectual heavyweight and friend (who's also involved in my RE-BROADCAST THE PATH TO 911 group) Mark Tapson!

Hollywood’s 9/11 Blind Spot
By Mark Tapson

A Los Angeles Times article recently began by noting that Extremely Loud & Incredibly Close​, the Tom Hanks​ post-9/11 film which opens on Christmas, is one of the very few Hollywood productions to try to come to grips with the impact of September 11, 2001​ on our national psyche. The piece then went on to ponder the question, “Why so few Sept. 11 films?” and concluded that “the film industry has tiptoed around this national tragedy.” Indeed it has, but not for the reasons suggested in the Times article.
The Times points out that there have been plenty of documentaries about the day and its aftermath, but ten years after the terrorist attacks, only two major feature films — Oliver Stone​’s World Trade Center and Paul Greengrass​’ United 93 – have specifically dealt with the day in question, and “neither film was a roaring commercial success.”
“If anything,” the article continues, “the film industry has used the tragedy as an excuse to deluge TV and the multiplex with political thrillers focusing on terrorism,” citing Showtime’s series Sleeper Cell and Homeland, the feature film The Kingdom, and the upcoming film by The Hurt Locker​ filmmakers about the killing of Osama bin Laden. An “excuse” to focus on terrorism? Sept. 11 was not some vague “tragedy”; it was a terrorist attack. The enemy pretty much did that focusing for us. In any case, none of those thrillers exactly set the box office or Nielsen ratings on fire either.
Among the sources offering their thoughts on the topic was novelist Amy Waldman, author of The Submission, a novel about a Muslim architect who wins a contest to design a Ground Zero Memorial. Waldman thinks that Hollywood has steered clear of addressing 9/11 because overexposure of that fateful morning has squeezed out any possibility for imaginative interpretation:

Has any event in history been so visually documented and seen from every possible angle by so many people? There’s not a ton of room for the imagination there.

Really? No room for the imagination? If anything, the attacks have spawned some of the wildest flights of filmmakers’ imaginations – namely, Michael Moore​’s fact-challenged Fahrenheit 911​ and the even more outlandish Loose Change, which posit that the collapse of the Twin Towers was an inside job carried out by the demonic George W. Bush and his cronies. “No room for the imagination” seems like an, well, unimaginative explanation.


Closer to the truth is film critic Marshall Fine​, quoted as saying that 9/11

[has] been covered almost too carefully. [Hollywood’s] been so worried about offending somebody’s sensibilities that they’ve held off. There’s so much caution.

Hollywood has been afraid of offending sensibilities. Where it once led the propaganda charge against the Nazis and Japanese imperialists, Hollywood is now afraid of offending the very Islamists who have declared war on us, because it doesn’t want to incur their violent wrath. It’s even afraid of being called Islamophobic. Hollywood is much more comfortable clinging to the multiculturalist orthodoxy which faults the racist, imperialist, warmongering America and the West for all international conflict.
“The one thing the [9/11 attacks] did do,” says film professor David Irving in the Times,

was open our eyes to this world in the Middle East, and I think a lot of the movies that came out as a result of that, it’s been a way for us to understand why [9/11] happened, because it was not some random act.

Indeed it was not a random act. But ten years after that morning, have the movies that resulted from it been helpful for us “to understand why 9/11 happened”? Or were they merely efforts on the part of left-leaning filmmakers to spread their morally obfuscating, America-loathing, anti-war messages?


One project did indeed strive to help America understand. The article neglects to mention the miniseries The Path to 9/11, a docudrama which drew 27 million viewers on the fifth anniversary of the attacks. A $30+ million project that aired on two September nights in 2006, The Path to 9/11 dramatized the historical thread that connected the 1993 bombing of the World Trade Center, Islamic attacks on American interests throughout the ‘90s, and the terrorism of that fateful morning in 2001. Drawing upon The 9/11 Commission Report and other reliable sources, it connected the dots for audiences more thoroughly and accurately than any Hollywood project before or since, and had been slated for use as an educational tool in schools across the country.
But Clinton administration alumni, fearful that any portrayal of their flaccid response to the rising tide of Islamic terrorism in the ‘90s would tarnish their legacy, lashed out hard; ABC/Disney never aired that controversial miniseries again and still refuses to release it on DVD due to political reasons (check out the documentary Blocking the Path to 9/11 for the whole outrageous story).
Meanwhile, the bulk of Hollywood’s 9/11-related output supported the left’s narrative that America’s own hegemonic geopolitical meddling, not global jihad, is to blame for Muslim rage. Movies like Syriana with George Clooney, Traitor starring Don Cheadle, and Body of Lies featuring Leonardo DiCaprio​ all portrayed the CIA as no better than our enemy, and Muslims as victims of Western imperialist greed.
Tied closely to Hollywood’s depiction of the war on terror was its perspective on the war in Iraq. The Times article claims that Hollywood’s seeming reluctance to deal in a meaningful way with 9/11

might have something to do with the lessons learned from the failure of a slew of movies about the Iraq war — audiences would rather not pay to see a film about an event that is too close, too painful or has been too well covered by the media.

In fact, the Times and Hollywood itself remain clueless about the most glaringly obvious reason that slew of flicks failed. It wasn’t because the events are too close or too painful, but because every one of those box office duds – Matt Damon’s The Green Zone, Tom Cruise’s Lions for Lambs​, Sean Penn’s Fair Game, In The Valley of Elah, Stop: Loss, Rendition, Redacted, The Hurt Locker​ and more – every one depicted the war as a Bush administration deception and/or our soldiers as traumatized, walking time bombs.
American audiences rejected that message. They have been repelled by Hollywood’s messages of moral equivalence and flagellating self-guilt, its disrespect and pity toward our warriors, and its refusal to celebrate American values and to take a patriotic stance in our war with Islamic fundamentalists. That’s why Hollywood has spent ten years failing at coming to grips with 9/11 and its aftermath.

Spread it far and wide...I said SPREAD IT!

The Daily Caller covers Disney's and the Clintons' rape of free speech

Matthew Boyle drops a bomb at THE DAILY CALLER!!

DISNEY CEO BURIES INCONVENIENT FACTS ABOUT 9/11 TO PROTECT HILLARY CLINTON, SAY ACTIVISTS

Activists tell The Daily Caller that The Walt Disney Company is refusing to re-air a 9/11-related docudrama, effectively burying politically inconvenient facts about the events which led to the 9/11 terror attacks, in order to protect the political future of Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.

“The Path to 9/11,” first aired on ABC in 2006, portrayed President Bill Clinton’s administration as ignoring warnings and signs that Osama bin Laden and al Qaida were planning a major attack on the United States — a finding supported by The 9/11 Commission Report. But since 2006 Disney CEO Bob Iger has repeatedly refused to rebroadcast it, or to sell the rights to other broadcasters.

President Clinton and his national security adviser Sandy Berger refused to issue an ultimatum to bin Laden and the Taliban in Afghanistan after the USS Cole bombing in October 2000. Both Berger and Clinton later told the 9/11 Commission that there was not enough evidence at the time to link bin Laden to the bombing. Clinton and former President George W. Bush have both been publicly criticized for not militarily responding to that attack before September 11, 2001.

Bush and Clinton have also both taken heat for not capturing, killing or attacking bin Laden before 9/11, even though there were several opportunities for both administrations to do so.

“I think those early opportunities are clear,” 9/11 Commission Chairman and former New Jersey Gov. Tom Kean said on Meet The Press in 2004. “We had him. We saw him. I think maybe we could have done something about it.”

“Nobody wanted to invade Afghanistan at that point. American people probably wouldn’t have stood for it,” Kean told host Tim Russert about whether he planned to question Bush, Clinton and their vice presidents on this specific point. “But could we have sent a team in? Could we have sent a cruise missile in? Could we have gotten him and his leadership at some point?”

Kean said “The Path to 9/11” and his commission’s report on the events that led up to the 2001 terrorist attacks make both Republicans and Democrats look bad, but Americans needed to see it.

The commission’s report identified many indications that the Clinton administration, and the early Bush administration, hadn’t taken advantage of opportunities over the course of several years to take out bin Laden. Michael Scheuer, the former head of the CIA’s bin Laden unit, told reporters in 2004 that he and other intelligence officials in his unit provided the Clinton administration with actionable information at least ten times that could have led to bin Laden’s demise. (RELATED: Dick Cheney praises Hillary Clinton)

“The Path to 9/11” included this information, and more. It tied the 9/11 bombings back to the 1993 World Trade Center bombings, showing there were warning signs of an imminent attack even then. And it highlighted warnings from Ahmad Shah Massoud — an Afghan leader who sharply criticized the Taliban and al Qaeda – of devastating terrorism on the horizon.

Massoud was killed two days before the 9/11 attacks, but he had previously warned U.S. intelligence officials that his assassination would be regarded as a precursor warning to a forthcoming terrorist attack. The film recounts warnings Massoud issued over the course of several years.

Conservative blogger Resa LaRu Kirkland told The Daily Caller that the “Path to 9/11” is the only film she has seen that fully and accurately portrays Massoud’s warnings and criticisms of bin Laden.

NEXT: How did liberal groups first react to 'The Path to 9/11'?

Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2011/09/11/disney-ceo-buries-inconvenient-facts-about-911-to-protect-hillary-clinton-say-activists/#ixzz1XgcZYjvb
Go forth, and spread the good word!!!

PRIVATE VIEWING OF THE PATH TO 911 IN LOS ANGELES, GUEST SPEAKER JOHN FREAKIN' BOLTON!!!!

OK, I know I'm trying to have the massive, millions-can-view-at-once, screw-you-Clintons/Disney online private livestream viewing of THE PATH TO 911, but this group is holding a private viewing in Los Angeles for the 10th anniversary on Sunday, September 11, and John Bolton is guest speaker!

You heard me...JOHN-FREAKIN'-BOLTON!!!!  I know, right?

So if you are in LA, don't miss this or I will find you!!!  You want WARCHICK on your doorstep, tapping her foot, arms crossed, all pissed off?  Didn't think so!

	American Freedom Alliance presents A Commemoration and Policy Forum 9/11 + 10: Is the U.S. Any Safer Today? Featuring Ambassador John Bolton Screening of Director's Cut of The Path to 9/11 Children's Choir Three panels addressing the consequences and aftermath of 9/11 Sunday, September 11, 2011 11: 00 am- 7:00 pm Location: Intercontinental Hotel Century City, 2121 Avenue of the Stars Admission: $35.00 ( including film screening, lunch and policy forum ) $25.00 ( policy forum only) $20.00 ( film screening only) Co-sponsored by Operation Gratitude, Daniel Pearl Foundation, J.I.N.S.A., 30 Years After; Ayn Rand Institute, David Horowitz Freedom Center, A.C.T. for America ( San Fernando Valley Chapter), San Fernando Valley Republican Club. Please respond to the American Freedom Alliance (310) 444 3085 or at adavis@americanfreedomalliance.org Click here for AFA Lecture Series Page CAN YOU BELIEVE IT? DO YOU BELIEVE IN MIRACLES??

TRYING MEN’S SOULS And The Mouse That Silenced

by Resa LaRu Kirkland

                                 

Thomas Paine wrote in his famous war cry, “These are the times that try men’s souls.”

He was right then, and he would be right today as well.  Have you ever seen more flagrant, gross, or outrageous violations of morality, common sense, or our beloved Constitution than exists in the past few years?  If you are a student of history and a master of critical thinking, the answer is an immediate and loud “No!”

Our Founding Fathers (FFs) knew their obligation was to truth, not politeness.  They also knew that when wicked leaders rule, the pattern of history is that truth is outlawed.  First they start by regulating your actions, then your speech, and then, in defiance of all reason, the idea of regulating human thought actually becomes rational.

And learn this now:  no freedom in history has ever been snatched from humanity without first being regulated “for our own good.”


                                         
                                                 

                                                                    Cyrus Nowrasteh

It is with this knowledge that I have undertaken a task that could get me into trouble, for the nation’s “own good.” 

I am personally sponsoring a private online viewing of THE PATH TO 911 this September.  It is the definitive docudrama of what led to 9/11, beginning with the 1993 WTC bombing and ending with the collapse of the towers.

Why do I need to undertake such a task?  Because in spite of paying 40 million dollars to have it made, in spite of planning to give it to high schools across the country to use when they taught about the worst attack on American soil in our history, in spite of promising to release it within 6 months of its premiere, in spite of expressing their goal to show it every year on the anniversary of 9/11, in spite of 27 million people watching it over two nights when it debuted in 2006 for the 5^th anniversary, in spite of garnering 7 Emmy nominations, and in spite of writer/producer Cyrus Nowrasteh’s vigilant determination to research thoroughly and bring us the truth (which he did, and beautifully so) Disney has refused to not only release it on DVD, but has refused to ever ever ever show it again, not even on the anniversaries.

Why?  Two words, and nasty ones at that:  Bill and Hillary.  What the truth showed about Clinton cowardice could not only stain his “legacy” (disgusting pun fully intended), but threatened the still-on-the-table future Presidency plans for Hillary. 

Why should Disney CEO Robert Iger care?  Because he is best buds with the Clintons, and contributes to their campaigns.

That’s called political thuggery.  That’s called deceit and cowardice.  That’s called un-American.

                                 

So I am going to do it myself.  Watch the trailer below, and then you tell me if it’s OK for Politically Castrated, impotent and pathetic pols to commit abuse against the Constitution and re-write history.

And if you can do it without the red face, clenched teeth, and flared nostrils, I don’t want you involved.  Because if this evil doesn’t make you angry, then you don’t know right from wrong, and there’s nothing worse than the guy who walks the middle of the road.  They put everyone in danger, not just themselves. And they don’t have what it takes to handle the times that try souls when a mouse remains silent.

Get angry.  Get informed.  Get ready…cause for the 10^th anniversary of 9/11, free speech lives again.  Watch the trailer and take a stand.





Get some faith, bros, and some courage, for there’s no substitute for VICTORY.

See you in September….

THE PATH TO 911--Join the online private viewing for the 10th anniversary, this September

Yup, your prayers have been answered!  This September, for the first time since it premiered in 2006, WARCHICK Restoration will be sponsoring a private viewing of the definitive docudrama THE PATH TO 911 (Screw you, Disney/Bill/Hill!)  Details are forthcoming, but it will probably be over 3 nights, with question/answer period after each night with cast and crew members of THE PATH as well as those swept up in the #PoliticallyCastrated #Islammunist censoring that those freedom-lovin' eunuchs of the left ALWAYS engage in when they are threatened with exposure (Insert #TeeneeWeenee joke here!)


If you wish to be involved as more than just a viewer, I can use all the help I can get...contact me!  But if you just want to watch, you MUST spread this far and wide.  We are an exceptional people...let's do a job worthy of our heritage!


DON'T FORGET TO JOIN THE FACEBOOK GROUP!  ALSO ON FREEDOM CONNECTOR!


Keep the faith, bros, in all things courage, and no substitute for VICTORY!

First half of rough of ad campaign for THE PATH TO 911

Please let me know what you think all!  I'm still working...won't quit!  Thanks to original music by Michael McLean!

Uh...hello? Bill? How many times did you drop your nuts and run from a chance to kill Osama?

Hypocrisy at it's Politically Castrated fagatronic Islammunist eunuch finest!

Remember this scene, cut from THE PATH TO 911 at the nutless insistence of the Clintons?



 Apparently, Bill and Hill done forgot!


This posted today, sent to me by John Ziegler!  It doesn't get any more nutless than this...PATHETIC!

Bill Clinton: Would’ve Been ‘Impossible To Explain’ If Obama Had Passed On Bin Laden Mission

 Former President Bill Clinton appeared on CNBC and revealed for the first time to Maria Bartiromo his thoughts on the Osama bin Laden raid. Clinton admitted he worries about Pakistan given that there are enough Pakistanis who buy into Al Qaeda to cause damage, yet at the same time he still considers Pakistan, as a country, to be a partner with us in the war on terror.

In describing why President Obama made the right call to go into Pakistan to get Bin Laden, Clinton says:

“I think he concluded what I often did when I did something that was risky as President, which is, ok you might fail by acting, you might fail by not acting. Which failure would be easier to explain? And even though it was a difficult decision, I think if it comes out sooner or later that [Bin Laden] was in fact there and if you had the capacity to go get him and you didn’t do it, I think it would be impossible to explain.”

Clinton provides an interesting philosophy for handling tough decisions as a politician: avoid the path where failing at it would be harder to explain. Yet whether or not that was the driving force behind Obama’s decision, Clinton applauded the actions taken by Obama.



""Which action would be easier to explain?"  How about which action is right, you nutless eunuch?  Dear God, does this PoS think beyond his 2 inch dick?  Get mad and then post this all over the damn planet!!!  OUTRAGEOUS, DESPICABLE, IMPOTENT HYPOCRISY!!!!


MASSOUD:  ARE THERE ANY MEN LEFT IN WASHINGTON, OR ARE THEY ALL COWARDS?

MORE IMPORTANTLY, ARE WE COWARDS?  WHAT SAY YOU AMERICA...FOR SAYING AND DOING NOTHING NEVER EVER EVER EVER EVER SUPPORTS THAT WHICH IS GOOD.  IT ONLY SUPPORTS THAT WHICH IS EVIL!

NOT TO SPEAK, IS TO SPEAK.  NOT TO ACT, IS TO ACT!

Get informed...support the private online twitter viewing of THE PATH TO 911 so you never forget what this asshole did and what it cost us!  For God's sake...and ours!

TO ARMS RIGHT NOW!