Search This Blog

Loading...

News to Abuse

Loading...

Tuesday, October 05, 2004

WELCOME TO THE WARCHICK FORUM!!!

Love the CHICK, hate the CHICK, now's your chance to tell the world! You can respond to articles, merchandise, links, books, speeches, public appearances, etc. I believe in freedom of speech, but for the consideration of others, please watch your language. Excessive swearing or abuse of members will result in your being banned, so play nice but play to win! After all, this is WAR!!!

Keep the faith, bros, and in all things courage!

37 comments:

Craig J. said...

Welcome to blogdom, Resa! I've added you to my list of "Morning Review" .. the sites I visit every day to get caught up. Can't wait to see you go off during the final month of Election 04.

You rock!

AMERICA'S WAR CHICK said...

Thanks Craig! You're such a web genius! Everyone give a shout out to my web designer!!!!

OK, am I the only one who thinks CBS and Dan Rather should be tried criminally for malicious attempt to defraud the general public, manufacturing fake government documents, and forgery?

It is more and more plain that only the Liberal Left can get away with the most horrendous of criminal acts! What losers.

Rob said...

Hey Resa - keep up the good work - I enjoy reading your articles - you're a true American and Patriot!

Love ya!

Your favorite retired Navy Commander Aviator

AMERICA'S WAR CHICK said...

Oh my gosh, it's Rob! He's here, and he really IS my favorite retired Naval Commander! You freaky little psychic you!

Man, did Bush nail it tonight or what? He beat that male afterbirth like he done stole somethin'!

Keep the faith, bros...we're winning!

AMERICA'S WAR CHICK said...

Ain't payback a bitch? Don't you love it when the ultra-liberal press gets a dose of its own wretched medicine? Go Swift Vets and Sinclair! Nail those bastards to the wall!

AMERICA'S WAR CHICK said...

Drink it in...this is awesome!

Wednesday, October 20th 2004


THE WASHINGTON POST


You’re a Republican???


In today’s America, ask a growing number of high school and college students; their teachers and professors; the self-anointed media elite and/or hard working men and women of all ethnicities, the question, “What is a Republican?”, and you’ll be told “… a rich, greedy, egotistical individual, motivated only by money and the desire to accumulate more and more of it, at the expense of the environment … the working poor ….and all whom they exploit…”

I am a Republican … I am none of those things… and I don’t know any Republicans who are.

WHAT I AM … first and foremost, is a loving husband of some 52 plus years, the father of four and an American who’s proud of his country… and his country’s heritage.

WHAT I AM … is the grandson of immigrants who risked everything, including their lives and those of their children, to escape tyranny in search of freedom.

WHAT I AM … is a man who grew up during the Depression and witnessed, first hand, the effects of the Stock Market crash and the soup lines that followed. I watched as both my parents and grand parents, who had very little themselves, share what food they had with a half dozen other families, who had even less.

WHAT I AM … is someone who worked his way through college by holding down three and four jobs at a time and then used that education to build a better life.

WHAT I AM … is a husband who, at age 24, started his own business for the “privilege” of working 60, 70 and 80 hours a week, risking everything I had, including my health, in search of a better life for myself and my loved ones.

WHAT I AM … is a businessman whose blood, sweat and tears…. and plenty of them…, made it possible for me to provide a secure living, not only for my family and myself, but also for literally hundreds of my employees throughout the years. Employees, who in turn, were able to buy their own homes, raise their own families and give back to their communities and their country.

WHAT I AM … is a man who believes in God; a God who has blessed this country… and all for which it stands.

WHAT I AM … is someone who knows, if you doubt miracles exist in today’s world, you need only to look into the face of those who received them … and the eyes of those who give them.

WHAT I AM … is an American who’s proud that his President embraces a belief in God; proud of a President who understands, as “politically incorrect” as it may be, there is evil in this world and for the security and safety of all freedom loving people everywhere, it must be confronted… and it must be defeated.

WHAT I AM … is an American who takes comfort in the knowledge that our President refuses to allow decisions concerning the very safety and security of this nation, to be governed by the political whims of foreign governments.

WHAT I AM … is tired of hearing from leading Democrats who see only negativity in America; racism in her people; class warfare in her society and “political incorrectness” in her character.

WHAT I AM … is a former democrat who now understands that it is the soldier and not the reporter that guarantees us our freedoms of press, speech and dissent.

WHAT I AM … is a man who believes in the sanctity of life. A man who is repulsed by the pandering of the political left for votes, at the expense of the unborn.

WHAT I AM … is a husband and father who believes in the sanctity of marriage and the preservation of the family unit.

WHAT I AM … is a movie go-er who is repulsed by those insecure, socially inept, elementary thinking, ego-inflated “entertainers” who have appointed themselves “experts” in the fields of national security and geo-politics and then use their forum to attack this nation, its leaders and its actions…. much to the delight and encouragement of our enemies.

WHAT I AM … is an American who understands the difference between “censorship” and “choice”. Evidently, these individuals do not, because when these same “celebrities” receive public ridicule for their offensive actions, the first thing they yell is “Censorship!”. What they seem incapable of understanding is… the right of free speech and dissent is shared equally by those offended… as well as those who offend. I support and will continue to support those films and performers whom I choose to … and refuse to support those I don’t. It is my right as an American … a right I will continue to enthusiastically exercise.

WHAT I AM … is a voter, tired of politicians, who, every time their voting records are subjected to public scrutiny, try to divert attention from their political and legislative failures by accusing their opponents of “attack ads” and “negative campaigning”…. and the news media who allow them to get away with it.

WHAT I AM … is a Catholic who loves his God and his Faith… and who’s been taught to respect all religions whose teachings are based in love, peace and charity. As such, I am embarrassed and ashamed of those individuals, in both private and public life, whose decisions and actions are devoid of any sense of character or morals; individuals who are only driven by what’s best for them … rather than what’s right … often times at the expense of many …. including our national security.

WHAT I AM … is a realist who understands that the terrorist attack that murdered hundreds of innocent Russian children could have occurred here, in our heartland. That’s why I sincerely believe America needs now, more than ever, a President who sees with a clear and focused vision and who speaks with a voice when heard by both friend and foe alike, is understood, respected and believed.

WHAT I AM … is eternally grateful to Ronald Reagan for having the bravery to speak out against Communism and the courage of his convictions in leading the fight to defeat it; and George W. Bush for the vision, courage, conviction and leadership he has shown in America’s war on terrorism amidst both the constant and vicious, personal and political attacks both he and his family are made to endure.

WHAT I AM … is a human being, full of numerous faults and failures, but a man nonetheless, who, though not always successful, has continually strived to do “what’s right” instead of “what’s easy”. A man who is challenging the religious leaders of all faiths, to not only preach to their congregations the fundamentals of “what’s right” and “what’s wrong”, but to also then hold them accountable for their actions in both the public and private sectors.

WHAT I AM … is disgusted with the Courts who, on one hand, call the murder of a pregnant woman a “double homicide” but then refer to the abortion of her baby as, “pro-choice”.

WHAT I AM … is someone deeply troubled by a political party which embraces a candidate whose primary “leadership” qualities center around his protesting of the Vietnam war and his labeling the honorable men and women who fought in it, (50,000 of whom gave their lives in that action), as rapists, and war criminals. That same political party then stepped forward this year to block the appearance of a true Vietnam war hero, retired Admiral and former United States Senator, Jeremiah Denton, (a man who spent seven years and seven torturous months in a North Vietnam prison), from speaking before an open session of the California legislature as part of that state’s 4th of July celebration. The reason Democrats gave for refusing to allow this American hero to speak before their state legislature was because of the “conservative” nature of his views. As an American, that troubles me deeply ….as well it should you.

WHAT I AM … is a man who feels the need to spend, $104, 655.60,(tax paid) of his own money, to purchase this advertisement, in order to set the story straight. Some may say this money would have been better spent feeding the world’s poor. At the risk of sounding self-serving, as an American and as a Republican, for the last six decades of my life, I have done exactly that… and more. Following the examples of my parents and grand parents, I have used my earnings to feed the poor, shelter the homeless, provide housing for the elderly and medical care for the sick….. and continue to do so… and I’m not alone in that work.

WHAT I AM … is someone who is paying for this announcement, at my sole expense, in hopes of opening the eyes of those led blindly by ill-informed elements of our great nation, who, through either ignorance, or malicious intent, repeatedly attack and belittle those of us who belong to a political party that holds true to the belief, “… the rights of the governed, exceed the power of the government”. For those interested, I am speaking only as a tax-paying individual who is in no way associated with The Republican National Committee, nor with any of its directors, or delegates.

WHAT I AM … is a man who understands, “the American way of life” is a message of self-empowerment for all.

WHAT I AM … is an American who is grateful that our nation gives each of us the opportunity of self-determination and the right to benefit from the fruits of self achievement.

WHAT I AM … is an American who wants to preserve that way of life for all who seek it.

WHAT I AM … is blessed to be an American…. and proud to be Republican.



George J. Esseff, Sr.
george@esseff-foundation.org

Doug said...

Hey Resa, the guy you talk about in "What Would Hitler Do?" May be on to something... take it easy on the freaks!

I envision a day when nobody picks on leftist losers, the "tax the rich" economically-- not to mention mentally-- challenged, Marxist twirps, and Kum Ba Yah singing hand holding peace fairies.

I see a day when people like Michael Moore and Ted Kennedy, who compromise nothing except truth and the architechtural integrity of the stage from which they speak, aren't chastized. When dorkwad environmentalists who burn 175,000 gallons of jet fuel to fly to an eco conference on ozone depletion, France, dingbats who endorsed John Kerry--such as Al Gore, Bruce Springsteen, and Osama bin Laden, morons who clog the highway because their kumquat-powered hybrid can't go over 15 mph, and Marxist simps who are against all corporations except those companies who put out their incorrigably bad movies and cd's, are left alone, free from the bondage of common sense and historical learning.

I may not get there with ya, but the day will come when we get to the bipartisan promised land, and all name calling stops. Even a leftist doofus wants that!

AMERICA'S WAR CHICK said...

ROAR!!!

Everyone, meet Doug Powers, the funniest social commentator on earth! Read him every Monday in his weekly column at World Net Daily, and visit his website at www.dougpowers.com. It's well worth the trip!

Yes, hippies can lie, cheat, steal, dumb down and stink up the joint, but heaven forfend if we actually call them on it! Oy!

AMERICA'S WAR CHICK said...

BUSH WINS! BUSH WINS! BUSH WINS!

And Daschle is out...go Sioux!

Thank you, Father in Heaven, for giving us so much AND forGIVING us so much!

Doug said...

Let the Dems tears flow, and the blame fly! I feel sort of bad for Teresa Heinz... Oh sure, when things start to go bad, they automatically blame the one who sounds like a Gabor Sister with Tourette Syndrome. It's "snob bashing" at its worst!

AMERICA'S WAR CHICK said...

Oh man, Doug...you are so GOOD when you're BAD!!!

Craig J. said...

You feel bad for Teresa H? Strange, I don't. I don't feel bad for any of them. Let them cry. I sleep very well at night knowing W is back in charge for another 4 years.

I have never *enjoyed* liberal disappointment as much as I am this time around. As Peggy Noonan said: SAVOR.

AMERICA'S WAR CHICK said...

Oh that was good, Craig. I've always like Noonan.

I think I'll sit back and savor a bit...

Jack said...

I read your

"THEY'RE DOING IT AGAIN--Why the Hippies Need To (Me) Lie"

Over on TNUSA's Forums.

You made a comparison between what that Marine did in Fallujah to what happened in
My Lai and that both were justified.

Personally, I don't see how acts such as these:

"A group of fifteen to twenty mostly older women were gathered around a temple, kneeling and praying. They were all executed with shots to the back of their heads. Eighty or so villagers were taken from their homes and herded to the plaza area. As many cried "No VC! No VC!", Calley told soldier Paul Meadlo, "You know what I want you to do with them". When Calley returned ten minutes later and found the Vietnamese still gathered in the plaza he reportedly said to Meadlo, "Haven't you got rid of them yet? I want them dead. Waste them." Meadlo and Calley began firing into the group from a distance of ten to fifteen feet. The few that survived did so because they were covered by the bodies of those less fortunate."

"As the third platoon moved into My Lai, it was followed by army photographer Ronald Haeberle, there to document what was supposed to be a significant encounter with a crack enemy battalion. Haeberle took many pictures [HAEBERLE PHOTOS]. He said he saw about thirty different GIs kill about 100 civilians. Once Haeberle focused his camera on a young child about five feet away, but before he could get his picture the kid was blown away. He angered some GIs as he tried to photograph them as they fondled the breasts of a fifteen-year-old Vietnamese girl."

"Meanwhile, the rampage below continued. Calley was at the drainage ditch on the eastern edge of the village, where about seventy to eighty old men, women, and children not killed on the spot had been brought. Calley ordered the dozen or so platoon members there to push the people into the ditch, and three or four GIs did. Calley ordered his men to shoot into the ditch. Some refused, others obeyed. One who followed Calley's order was Paul Meadlo, who estimated that he killed about twenty-five civilians. (Later Meadlo was seen, head in hands, crying.) Calley joined in the massacre. At one point, a two-year-old child who somehow survived the gunfire began running towards the hamlet. Calley grabbed the child, threw him back in the ditch, then shot him. "

Could ever be justified.

Maybe it's just me...

You might consider that, by attempting to compare the horrific acts that occured in My Lai to what recently happened in Fallujah, you are hurting, rather than helping that poor marines case.

I can't see how the sexual molestation of a
15 year old girl or the execution of a 2 year old could ever be militarily justified.

You have to draw the line somewhere.

We're not Nazis after all.

AMERICA'S WAR CHICK said...

You don't get it, do you? The CoC says you cannot kill non-combatants. But the VC turned women and children into combatants by using them.

Women were killing our warriors--combatting in the guise of civillian. Does this not justify self-defense?

Children were killing our warriors--combatting in the guise of civillian. Does this not justify self-defense?

It was indeed horrible, as I've stated over and over again. But it was a situation created by the VC to which our men were forced to react. Put the blame where the blame is due--at feet of the instigators, not those of the defenders.

I am sure many of the women and children did NOT want to be combatants, and were forced under threat to do so. They were in a lose-lose situation, but one created by their own countrymen, NOT the American Warrior.

Our Warriors' reactions to this situation is both logical and reasonable. How My Lai evolved is an example of what can and does happen in a war zone with an enemy for whom the slaughter of his own does not matter. WE did not want to kill women and children, but the enemy did, knowing full well that it would both harm our men, and then they could "pretend" to care and use it as propaganda against the American "invaders" to turn the world and the lame ass hippies in this country to their side. It worked back then because of people like you, who focus on emotion--like women do--instead of logic and reason.

Would you have rathered that Calley and Medina came home in a casket instead? Because the hippies wish all Warriors were killed...listen to them sometime.

These men walk the line, do what we won't, all so I can do what I choose to do. Never forget that. And that doesn't just mean putting his life in mortal danger...it also means killing others. Those who survive war pay the highest price of all, and those who accuse and condemn them are making sure that price is as high and unreasonable as possible. Those who accuse are the monsters along with the VC.

That's right; we're NOT Nazis. We are a good and decent country. We did NOT premeditate to go to 'Nam and kill innocent people as the Nazis did. We have never--even after winning a war--taken over and annexed another land. We take our enemy by the hand, build him up better and stronger than ever, and turn him into an ally. No one ever does that; we do.

One last thing. The biggest reason Truman used the bomb to end WWII is because Japan was arming its women and children with broomsticks to fight off the American landing. They were going to fight to the last Japanese, as is part of the Boshido code. It was estimated that it would have cost us 1 million men, and Japan over 3 million. Truman dropped the bomb NOT ONLY to save our men, but to spare them being forced to slaughter women and children.

That was the evil of Japan...to be willing to use women and children as pawns of war to kill, demoralize, or psychologically damage American Warriors is unconscionable. That is what the enemy does, NOT us. We were not the bad guys in 'Nam...the VC were. We are not the bad guys now...Islam/Communism is.

Jack said...

War Chick,

I read your response. And I still don't get it. I strongly disagree with your argument that the massacre at My Lai was somehow justified.

I don't see the comparison between the cold blooded murder of defenseless women, children and old men and a marine shooting someone that he legitemately thought was a threat.

And there is the difference between the two situations, IMHO.

The marine thought that the Arab guy had the potential to actually harm him. He had
seen other apparently wounded Iraquis hurt his buddies.

I don't see how you can make a case that the
civilians in My Lai were an actual threat to
the GI's that killed them.

What I get from your original post is that
the killing of those civilians in My Lai was
justified because in other times, civilians
had threatened or harmed US personel, as I'm sure they did. I just don't see how that qualifies the killing that went on in My Lai.

I cannot imagine a situation where killing a child that is not personally threatening you is justified.

Apparently you can.

I'll go farther, I don't think it's right to kill civilians that are grown men as punishment for what other's have done. As long as those grown men haven't done anything wrong...

Even if you say that, at times, the communists in Viet Nam used civilians, women and children as shields or to plant bombs or whatever...I can't see how it justifies the cold blooded murder that apparently went on at My Lai.

In WWII, it was the policy of the German Army to kill random civilians as punishment for the actions of rebel fighters.

They rarely picked children. Seems like even the Nazis didn't feel comfortable with that senario.

Why do you?

As for your comments on Japan. You are basically right. We dropped the A Bombs because we wanted to avoid the massive casualities that would have happened if we had had to invade the mainland. Whether the
Japanese would have used women and children
to fight, we'll never know. They didn't use
those tactics when we invaded the Japanese island of Okinawa.

If we had invaded, and the Japanese had used armed women and children to defend their country, then we certainly would have been justified in killing them. On the other hand, I don't think it would have justified the cold blooded killing of non-combatant women and children. Unless they were a percieved threat.

Anyway, I don't see what the Japanese situation has to do with the discussion at hand.

Further, IMHO, your comparison between what
Wm Calley's men did in My Lai and what that
Marine did in Fallujah dishonors the Marine.

I don't imagine he would be very happy with the comparison.

Jack said...

BTW...Just a little history. We have, after winning a war, annexed land.

bobby said...

i was woundering if there were any comments on the marine that is finally being charged with disertion from his unit; ended up in lebinon or something. just another muslim running from the evil infadel or another spy for the muslims on our military? i think it is just another pig running for allah to save him from the infadels; another thing why de we let this happen and why do we let there pigs in?

AMERICA'S WAR CHICK said...

Sigh. Jack, if the logic and reason escape you, then more of the same ain't gonna help. Sorry, but this was intended for those who could follow a logical sequence to a reasonable conclusion that any human in the same circumstances could and most likely would make.

Bobby, how interesting that you talked about this soldier. I'll be doing a follow up on the AWOL Arab...I'm voting for Court Martial and a trial for High Treason.

Doug said...

Throw in a court martial for spelling errors, and we can get a whole bunch of folks tossed in the pokey!

AMERICA'S WAR CHICK said...

Oh man, if we could charge people for crimes against grammar, there wouldn't be a rapper or Puerto Rican anywhere near America! (evil grin)

Hari Narayan Singh said...

The degree of threat we faced from the civilians at My Lai is something we will probably never know. However, the assertion that if some of the civilians in an enemy nation attack us, we should kill them all is ridiculous. Civilians will always die in war, but organized slaughter of civilians based on a small chance that some of them will attack you us unethical and unAmerican. Civilians should not be off-limits, but soldiers who kill without discretion need to be disciplined.
You have suggested numerous times that women have a severe deficit of logic. Why should anyone listen to you then? I think you belittle your own gender just to please your reader base.

AMERICA'S WAR CHICK said...

Boy, what the hell is wrong with you? You're G-d damned right we have the right to kill others when we are attacked!!! Put down the Vodka, son, and save what cells you have left. Sheeyit.

This was not an organized attack, butt for brains, it was an anomaly, but one that resulted from the organized and embedded actions of the VC. The VC is responsible for My Lai, and you God damned well know it. Your distraction tactcis do NOT work with those of us who can think for ourselves here in a free republic, and I suggest you pull your dick out of your mommy's purse and start growing a pair.

If governments are going to support and/or look the other way while their people behave in outrageous behavior...if they aren't going to stop them...then we will, and we will do so without apology. And you bet your brown ass that women don't use logic, which is why I don't believe that the majority of women belong in business, politics, or the military. Those who are willing to think as men do have every right to be in such areas, but since the majority do not, then dammit, society should not be forced to put up with their loser pussy politics.

God...I think YOU'RE a woman...no logic, no reason, and pure emotional hysteria. For God's sake!

Jack said...

"Boy, what the hell is wrong with you? You're G-d damned right we have the right to kill others when we are attacked!!! Put down the Vodka, son, and save what cells you have left. Sheeyit.

This was not an organized attack, butt for brains, it was an anomaly, but one that resulted from the organized and embedded actions of the VC. The VC is responsible for My Lai, and you God damned well know it. Your distraction tactcis do NOT work with those of us who can think for ourselves here in a free republic, and I suggest you pull your dick out of your mommy's purse and start growing a pair.

If governments are going to support and/or look the other way while their people behave in outrageous behavior...if they aren't going to stop them...then we will, and we will do so without apology. And you bet your brown ass that women don't use logic, which is why I don't believe that the majority of women belong in business, politics, or the military. Those who are willing to think as men do have every right to be in such areas, but since the majority do not, then dammit, society should not be forced to put up with their loser pussy politics.

God...I think YOU'RE a woman...no logic, no reason, and pure emotional hysteria. For God's sake!"

Yeesh...this forum needs a "rolls eyes" icon...

You're outa your head.

Hari Narayan Singh said...

MY distraction tactics? Ad hominim is the ultimate distraction from rational argument, and you use it abundantly. You insult my intelligence for suggesting that military commanders should excercise discretion when killing people? War is about killing who you WANT to kill, and minimizing the deaths of those you don't want to, for a very practical reason. Every unnecessary civilian death an army causes strengthens the cause of the enemy and makes them more dangerous.

Hari Narayan Singh said...

I imagine I can anticipate what you're going to say: "Damn RIGHT we kill who we WANT to kill. Quit stating the obvious, you vulva-brained nitwit." I doubt that you would hesitate to pick at someone's language like that. Obviously what I meant was that in war we should try to restrict our killing to that which is advantageous to us. Trying to break a people's morale will usually backfire.
Now I bet you'll say that I insulted myself, saving you the trouble. My reply to that is, we both know that when a writer puts something in quotes, it is probably not his opinion.

AMERICA'S WAR CHICK said...

Good God...you're actually getting dumber!

That's right, buttlicker...a good military's goal is to minimize unecessary deaths. So then tell me, commie bastard...why do commies and rag heads use women, children, and other cvillians to do their dirty work? Why do THEY--not us, numb nuts--turn the innocent into combatants? This is THEIR sin, THEIR evil--and YOURS, since you support it--not OURS. If the enemy turns someone into a combatant, we damned well have the right to kill them. Again...WHAT THE HELL IS WRONG WITH YOU? If a woman is coming at you with a gun, you're not going to defend yourself? (Well, a dickless twit hippy lame ass like yourself probably won't, but most normal, life-loving, freedom-defending human beings most definitely will!)

Re-read the article again, and this time use logic and reason instead of the emotional womanesque overload. Once the enemy engages in such wicked tactics, we will always have the right to defend ourselves, and we will do so WITHOUT APOLOGY! Where is the outrage against the VC for using their own people in such a horrific manner? Where is the disgust against Communism for the rape, murder, and destruction of Southeast Asia?

You're either retarded or in denial...or a commie, which encompasses both.

Jack said...

OMG...Whata freakin whackjob...

Hari Narayan Singh said...

I think troops have the right to defend themselves from anyone, which I thought I made clear.
None of my previous posts were about My Lai. They were against the idea that if SOME civilians of an enemy nation are trained to attack invading troops, and the host nation doesn't care about their people, then we should kill their civilians indiscriminately. After reading your article again, I am less sure that you think that either, but you have said plenty else to suggest that you do.
Regardless, you have lost credibility REALLY quickly in my view:
"I believe in freedom of speech, but for the consideration of others, please watch your language. Excessive swearing or abuse of members will result in your being banned..."
Wow. What hypocricy. You should ban yourself, woman. Besides, it huwts my widdo feewings! I'm gonna cry all the way to my Party meeting now. But seriously, the only people who are impressed by profuse insults are adolescents and those who doublethink their way of acknowledging all the geological research of the Earth as it was over 7,000 years ago.

Doug said...

>"You're either retarded or in denial...or a commie"
>
>

This is the best redundant sentence I've read all month!

Hari Narayan Singh said...

That should have been "OUT of acknowledging."

Steve B said...

Hey WarChick,

I was so inspired by your Blog that I started my own. Check it out if interested.

http://partisan-pundit.blogspot.com/
"The reactionary rantings of an unapologetically fanatical right-wing zealot, dedicated to exposing all manner of journalistic malfeasance, philosophical hypcocrisy, and moral incontinence."

Pipewrench said...

HEY WARCHICK!!!!
I like your site. We need people like you here in NY to fight the Clintons a Schummers. (Lets face it I can't do it alone)

See ya on the Nugboard

www.tednugent.com

Pipe
New York State Director
Ted Nugent United Sportsmen of America

AMERICA'S WAR CHICK said...

I love NUGE-ites! Email me...resalaru@warchick.com.

Jeffrey Epstein needs me to get NUGE to help him with this symposium. CBS pussied--shocking, I know--and he's being threatened. Men such as NUGE could really help. Isn't there some way to get to him without having to go through some lame assistant? I know NUGE would help if possible.

AND...I'm going to try to go too. How far is NY from Connecticut?

Doug said...

More columns! We need more columns! The Resaholics are getting the shakes out here!

America's Wack Job said...

America owes big debt to George Bush for his brilliant handling of the situation in the mid east. I just wish we could always be at war and have armies all over the world eating American lead. Oooorahh.

AMERICA'S WAR CHICK said...

We are way behind in our ass kickin', but I would give anything for Ronaldus Maximus. THE GARDEN OF REAGAN is what we need so very much right now. I miss him so. There must be another man out there like him. Oh...there is. His name is Alan Keyes. Please run again, Dr. Keyes.