HT: Mike Blessing
Truly Magnificent...these are the men freedom grows.
http://www.allproudamericans.com/most-heavily-decorated-veteran-of-the-moder-era.html
WARCHICK is a military historian/conservative commentator. She is a frequent guest on multiple talk-radio shows and is author of the forthcoming "Forgotten Warrior" series. She coined the phrases "Political Castration"--nothing correct about it--and ISLAMMUNISM--the secret combination of Islam/Communism. She sounds the war cry on North Korea and its unholy alliance with terrorism. She has a degree in Education but stands firm against the NEA. WARCHICK has been an online favorite since 2002.
Tuesday, August 31, 2010
Monday, August 30, 2010
SHIA TAQIYYA--Freedom from Shari-dum
By: Resa LaRu Kirkland
Qur'an (3:54) - "…Allah schemed (against them): and Allah is the best of schemers."
Those who read my writings know that I have long called the enemy we are facing today “Islammunism,” which is the coming together of the most wicked of freedom’s enemies: Islam and communism. Look at Islamic nations and their allies—can you say Hitler/Stalin-type non-aggression pact?
And like Hitler and Stalin, no evil, no horror, no hellish tactic is beneath them. In fact, it’s commanded; it’s taqiyya: the right of Muslims to lie and deceive in the advancement of allah.
So should photo lies really be a shocker anymore? We’ve been down this road before…remember the Muslim photographer from Reuters? It’s still happening, yet Reuters is still around, still treated like a legitimate news source. To the Islammunist world, that’s the stamp of approval. Why quit when they’re getting exactly what they want?
So when Scott Winchell of StandUpAmericaUS.com asked me to look into this picture, I knew it wasn’t to find Waldo.
The pic was at Shia News with a date listed as August 23, 2010. The only information provided was this title American Soldiers disgraced Masjid in Iraq. As usual, it was being presented at a time when our troops were “pulling out,” so the world was focused on Iraq, and even though the pic originally surfaced in November, 2004, during the second battle for Fallujah, it is presented in such a manner that you would think it is recent.
That’s taqiyya; no lie too appalling, no deception too unconscionable.
A quick search proved that the pic appeared first and primarily at Muslim, communist, or anti-American sites. That really should be enough to discredit it. After all, rampant Islammunist photo-doctoring is so prolific that we should designate a wing of each hospital to it.
But just a two-day scratch of the surface of the pic revealed some interesting abnormalities. Now I’m no big-city fancy-schmancy graphic-ee photographer, but fortunately I worked with a graphic artist who is all that, and by looking at the picture through his Adobe CS5 program, we noticed a few things. NOTE: this picture pixilated very quickly, making it particularly difficult to evaluate.
Right off the bat the pic looks to me like soldiers preparing to head out in a convoy. They’re in full gear, resting and waiting, not dirty, muddy, sweating, torn up. They don’t look like guys who just fought a battle to secure the mosque (which Islammunists are notorious for using as strongholds, weapon caches, and torture rooms). These men were clearly preparing to go somewhere, not relaxing after a battle.
Then there’s what appears to be a giant erase mark in the middle of the elaborate carpet (see green arrow). The edges are not sharp, but fuzzy and scribbled. This cannot be attributed to glare from the many windows, as window light has distinct edges to it. This looks more like something was there but has been sloppily erased. So what was there?
Another glaring mistake is the missing insignia pointed out by the red arrows. Our non special ops warriors wear insignia…always. When magnified there is clearly a pixilated box on the arms of these men, where their insignia should go. And where are the shadows? There are few, if any, and often in different directions all throughout the pic.
Check out the aqua arrows. The ones pointing to the man on the left indicate a flat spot on his head, a possible photoshopped line, and a poor one at that. The straight edge of his leg, the awkward stance of the crossed leg seem to indicate he is leaning against something, yet there is only empty space behind him in the picture. The other aqua arrow, pointing to the feet of the man just right of center, show a perfectly straight line on the bottom of the foot. How many feet make a perfectly straight line, even in shoes?
The yellow arrows pointing to the men along the back wall shows a weird depth perception. They look too far away, yet their distance from the men sitting in the front middle is only about 30 feet, tops. Their head size seems to make them appear much further away.
And finally, the dark blue arrow. While there is indeed a great deal of light flooding the mosque from its many windows, close inspection of this man’s face and left arm clearly indicate an outdoor shot, in full, glaring sunlight. Look at all the other men nearby, in the same mosque. Not a single other man, even those nearby, show such bright light on them, even though there is bright light all over.
Get where I’m going?
For the hippy headed, here it is: this photo is suspicious at best, and I believe it is either a mosque with soldiers photoshopped in or a group standing around in an outdoor setting, readying to leave on a convoy, with a mosque photoshopped around them. Does it really matter which one it is? Taqiyya is taqiyya is taqiyya, and it is being used every day in every way, and must be called out, every time.
We are freedom, not shari-dum. Cry foul, stand your ground, and never, ever, ever submit. It is the one thing lies and deception cannot bear: truth, and the courage to back it.
Keep the faith, bros, in all things courage, and no substitute for VICTORY.
***UPDATE***
From SPUD, overseas Air Force man:
More obvious; the uniforms are wrong for August 2010. For the Army anyway; we were wearing the Green FRACU's not the brown uniforms used earlier in the campaign. The body armor is wrong too it's the older heavier style and if it were guys waiting for a convoy then they wouldn't be wearing knee pads. The Marines wear the brown uniform with no patches but by August 2010 they were completely out of Iraq.
Who took the picture? How did it get in the hands of the claimants? If the claim is that the picture was taken in 2010 then it's a fake and wrong based on my previous comments. If it's a 2004 pic it's possible that it might be real. However, there are still some anomalies that you have pointed out. If it's a 2004 pic the army did wear the brown uniforms but they also wore their patches (SF Soldiers sanitize their uniforms of patches etc. but these guys are not SF). You would have to get a picture of the whole building to see if that line in the middle was a skylight through the ceiling, it could also be a narrow window with the sun shining through it. More likely than not they are Army personnel because the Marines wear brown body armor, they don't carry black backpacks and the haircuts are wrong for Marines. The black backpacks are an indicator that they may have been using the building as a resting place but I don't see any bedding. I would have liked to see the outside of the building. I find it strange that they have their helmets off, that indicates it's a secure area not some random mosque in Fallujah at the height of the assault. Guys on a convoy stop wouldn't bring in their backpacks they would leave them in the vehicles. In 2004 General Order 1 was in effect and these guys would not have been in a mosque unless it was authorized or after a firefight with insurgents firing from a mosque in which case I would say I doubt they went blasting at those guys with their black backpacks on.
They can twist it any way they want; they'll always find something to harp on but it's always convenient to leave out the fact that muslim secret police can arrest you in the middle of the night or some knuckleheads with an AK-47 can burst into your house, claim you're a this or that and then cut your head off. Oh yea and by the way it's OK for them to shoot AT people from a holy mosque (or just plain old blow it up with a suicide bomber) but it's an infidel's sin to shoot back or blow it up or enter it to keep people from getting killed.
Qur'an (3:54) - "…Allah schemed (against them): and Allah is the best of schemers."
Those who read my writings know that I have long called the enemy we are facing today “Islammunism,” which is the coming together of the most wicked of freedom’s enemies: Islam and communism. Look at Islamic nations and their allies—can you say Hitler/Stalin-type non-aggression pact?
And like Hitler and Stalin, no evil, no horror, no hellish tactic is beneath them. In fact, it’s commanded; it’s taqiyya: the right of Muslims to lie and deceive in the advancement of allah.
So should photo lies really be a shocker anymore? We’ve been down this road before…remember the Muslim photographer from Reuters? It’s still happening, yet Reuters is still around, still treated like a legitimate news source. To the Islammunist world, that’s the stamp of approval. Why quit when they’re getting exactly what they want?
So when Scott Winchell of StandUpAmericaUS.com asked me to look into this picture, I knew it wasn’t to find Waldo.
The pic was at Shia News with a date listed as August 23, 2010. The only information provided was this title American Soldiers disgraced Masjid in Iraq. As usual, it was being presented at a time when our troops were “pulling out,” so the world was focused on Iraq, and even though the pic originally surfaced in November, 2004, during the second battle for Fallujah, it is presented in such a manner that you would think it is recent.
That’s taqiyya; no lie too appalling, no deception too unconscionable.
A quick search proved that the pic appeared first and primarily at Muslim, communist, or anti-American sites. That really should be enough to discredit it. After all, rampant Islammunist photo-doctoring is so prolific that we should designate a wing of each hospital to it.
But just a two-day scratch of the surface of the pic revealed some interesting abnormalities. Now I’m no big-city fancy-schmancy graphic-ee photographer, but fortunately I worked with a graphic artist who is all that, and by looking at the picture through his Adobe CS5 program, we noticed a few things. NOTE: this picture pixilated very quickly, making it particularly difficult to evaluate.
Right off the bat the pic looks to me like soldiers preparing to head out in a convoy. They’re in full gear, resting and waiting, not dirty, muddy, sweating, torn up. They don’t look like guys who just fought a battle to secure the mosque (which Islammunists are notorious for using as strongholds, weapon caches, and torture rooms). These men were clearly preparing to go somewhere, not relaxing after a battle.
Then there’s what appears to be a giant erase mark in the middle of the elaborate carpet (see green arrow). The edges are not sharp, but fuzzy and scribbled. This cannot be attributed to glare from the many windows, as window light has distinct edges to it. This looks more like something was there but has been sloppily erased. So what was there?
Another glaring mistake is the missing insignia pointed out by the red arrows. Our non special ops warriors wear insignia…always. When magnified there is clearly a pixilated box on the arms of these men, where their insignia should go. And where are the shadows? There are few, if any, and often in different directions all throughout the pic.
Check out the aqua arrows. The ones pointing to the man on the left indicate a flat spot on his head, a possible photoshopped line, and a poor one at that. The straight edge of his leg, the awkward stance of the crossed leg seem to indicate he is leaning against something, yet there is only empty space behind him in the picture. The other aqua arrow, pointing to the feet of the man just right of center, show a perfectly straight line on the bottom of the foot. How many feet make a perfectly straight line, even in shoes?
The yellow arrows pointing to the men along the back wall shows a weird depth perception. They look too far away, yet their distance from the men sitting in the front middle is only about 30 feet, tops. Their head size seems to make them appear much further away.
And finally, the dark blue arrow. While there is indeed a great deal of light flooding the mosque from its many windows, close inspection of this man’s face and left arm clearly indicate an outdoor shot, in full, glaring sunlight. Look at all the other men nearby, in the same mosque. Not a single other man, even those nearby, show such bright light on them, even though there is bright light all over.
Get where I’m going?
For the hippy headed, here it is: this photo is suspicious at best, and I believe it is either a mosque with soldiers photoshopped in or a group standing around in an outdoor setting, readying to leave on a convoy, with a mosque photoshopped around them. Does it really matter which one it is? Taqiyya is taqiyya is taqiyya, and it is being used every day in every way, and must be called out, every time.
We are freedom, not shari-dum. Cry foul, stand your ground, and never, ever, ever submit. It is the one thing lies and deception cannot bear: truth, and the courage to back it.
Keep the faith, bros, in all things courage, and no substitute for VICTORY.
***UPDATE***
From SPUD, overseas Air Force man:
More obvious; the uniforms are wrong for August 2010. For the Army anyway; we were wearing the Green FRACU's not the brown uniforms used earlier in the campaign. The body armor is wrong too it's the older heavier style and if it were guys waiting for a convoy then they wouldn't be wearing knee pads. The Marines wear the brown uniform with no patches but by August 2010 they were completely out of Iraq.
Who took the picture? How did it get in the hands of the claimants? If the claim is that the picture was taken in 2010 then it's a fake and wrong based on my previous comments. If it's a 2004 pic it's possible that it might be real. However, there are still some anomalies that you have pointed out. If it's a 2004 pic the army did wear the brown uniforms but they also wore their patches (SF Soldiers sanitize their uniforms of patches etc. but these guys are not SF). You would have to get a picture of the whole building to see if that line in the middle was a skylight through the ceiling, it could also be a narrow window with the sun shining through it. More likely than not they are Army personnel because the Marines wear brown body armor, they don't carry black backpacks and the haircuts are wrong for Marines. The black backpacks are an indicator that they may have been using the building as a resting place but I don't see any bedding. I would have liked to see the outside of the building. I find it strange that they have their helmets off, that indicates it's a secure area not some random mosque in Fallujah at the height of the assault. Guys on a convoy stop wouldn't bring in their backpacks they would leave them in the vehicles. In 2004 General Order 1 was in effect and these guys would not have been in a mosque unless it was authorized or after a firefight with insurgents firing from a mosque in which case I would say I doubt they went blasting at those guys with their black backpacks on.
They can twist it any way they want; they'll always find something to harp on but it's always convenient to leave out the fact that muslim secret police can arrest you in the middle of the night or some knuckleheads with an AK-47 can burst into your house, claim you're a this or that and then cut your head off. Oh yea and by the way it's OK for them to shoot AT people from a holy mosque (or just plain old blow it up with a suicide bomber) but it's an infidel's sin to shoot back or blow it up or enter it to keep people from getting killed.
Restoring Honor, Glenn Beck, God, and New Jerusalem.
No television journalist in the history of America has ever taught nightly lessons in Gospel Doctrine.
Wednesday, August 11, 2010
Sunday, August 08, 2010
HIPPY HEADED: Chicks Have Left Thinking for Left Thinking
By: Resa LaRu Kirkland
My anti-femmie articles have always been my most popular. I have gotten emails from people all over the United States, Canada, Australia, India, Europe, and a few letters that may possibly be from other planets.
And no, I don’t mean that because the people who were writing them were wrong in their outrage. I mean because the behavior and beliefs they describe are so completely out of this world.
That’s feminism for you…ugly aliens and constantly a pain in the butt (anal probe joke).
It started with this sweet letter from a young woman (I’ll call her “S”), who had more courage at 20 than I have at 44:
I received an A on the paper I wrote on your article, "Women Should Reject Feminism."
I am just getting my feet wet in school, and liberal politics run rampant in my classrooms. I have to do quite a bit of dissecting and analyzing, not to get caught up in "their" BS.
I have been reading some of your "stuff"; I am very impressed with your strong, unforgiving viewpoints. You are very inspirational to me. Thanks.
~ S
Needless to say, I was overwhelmed that something I wrote had affected this young woman so profoundly, and I feel uncomfortable saying that out loud. Truth is what it is, and the credit goes there. I’m consistently stunned that people are consistently stunned by stating the truth out loud, as if we’re all in on some agreement not to do so in the name of politeness. Apparently we have forgotten that our obligation is to truth, not “feewings.” And here’s the evidence.
After responding to S, she shared with me a raging debate going on between her and a friend who had the same hippy views she was running into in the ironically named halls of “higher education.” Remarkably, and predictably, her friend is more educated than S is, yet far less capable of a rational thought or cogent response.
And it began with a woman who rejected an education system overrun with communism and started thinking and studying for herself. It is clear as she explains herself and the debate with her “friend” that one of them follows the textbook behavior of evil: distract, divert, evade, deny, lie, ad hominem, and wear them out without ever actually addressing the subject at hand.
Anything but the truth. By their fruits…
In her own words, they are NOT in need of any editing other than names for privacy’s sake and personal commentary. What you are about to read about S makes the debate that follows, between her and her “educated” friend, even more remarkable…and inspiring (my commentary in red):
Warchick,
F*****g A right you have permission! I am tickled to death!!! =D
Speaking to her is utterly exhausting! Talking to her on everything from immigration to supporting our soldiers is mind numbing! Over Memorial Day weekend, she made comments about our girls and boys in uniform that turned my stomach and literally made me want to be sick! She is so lost and confused and it’s not even that her viewpoints, opposing my own, that bothers me, it is her complete lack of knowledge and the fact that she is ignorant of how to discuss anything in a clear, concise, logical manner. If she at least possessed some better argumentation skills, I could respect her opinion. She spews emotion after reaction after emotion. No logic. No freaking brain. Not like I have to tell you… I believe the conversation is now over so I will send it to you. Do your worst! (Best) =) (She stated this so concisely and accurately that my commentary is unnecessary.)
It ended with her realizing that she held no quarter to…my logic. Alas, she can see *some* light and now I remember why I bother with this sweet, uninformed girl. The saddest part about the whole thing is she is far more educated than I. I am not ashamed to say (due to excruciating family circumstances) I am a ninth grade dropout! She has an associate in psychology, and on her way to a bachelor. It is so scary to me; even the most educated people of this country are some of the most ignorant. Her degree, I think she feels, gives her the right to be an idiot! What does your education mean to you?! Scary! I just finished my first two college classes, with good grades. =) I haven’t been to school in more than eight years. “Diamond in the rough.” =)…
I was scared to show you the conversation, because of possible legal backlash. (My friend defaming your name or using threatening language) I should have known better! You are a real person, and you are intelligent enough to know political correctness is for people with idle minds. =)
I was also very surprised you took an interest in me at all or even replied to me at all. It took me a while to think over and realize why you even took the time to respond to my messages. I realize now that people like my friend are as disgusted by you, as we are them. (Left vs. Right) I also realize you need (well not exactly) people like me to encourage you. You are completely “Right” (pun intended) and out on a limb (and our numbers are not as strong as they should be) anything I can say or do to encourage you in your work is an honor. =)
~S
P.S. You can leave the bit out about me being an eighth grade drop-out, in your article. Like I said; I am not ashamed, I feel it may disparage your own point. (Dark past, extremely bright future) =)
Look at her reasoning, her perception, her decency, in the above and below, and contrast that with her friend’s convoluted logic and behavior below. You want to know the difference between the left and right? Read! It’s long, tough to get through, and as S said, exhausting. But it’s too important to shorten, and the perfect commentary on the idiocy of feminism and all leftist thinking. (Lightly edited for language, but not spelling, grammar, or logic…obviously).
FRIEND: I tried to send this as a message, but something is glitching, so i have to post it here. if it makes you mad, feel welcome to delete it w/out hurting my feewings. not that you really probably care about that. k? k.
i think it is soo ignorant (meaning lack of information or knowledge on subject) of you to be anti-femini...st, thats just f*****g stupid. So you dont think we have the right to be paid fairly, to vote, to divorce our husbands, to not wear dresses every f****n day, to question the men in our lives, to hold jobs besides teachers, nurses, secretaries and nannies????? Feminists and feminists alone brought about all the changes that brought these sort of rights to us. (Exactly how many women were in power? Oh right, those were majority old white European males who enacted laws on vote, land ownership, etc. But in femmie-speak, women did it because…well, I guess ‘cause they say so.)
S: No love-love you don't know my views we've never discussed this one I absolutely want everythin you mention above, we will talk...Haha friend you funny you think I'm so ignorant, you broke down ignorant for me... =D (Ooooooh! That’s gonna leave a mark!)
FRIEND: you might be right about modern feminism, but with everything i know about feminism in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, you're just wrong. (What does that have to do with the 21st Century?) There is nothing unequal and fascist about women wanting to vote, or having the right to disagree with their husbands or divorce them, or work in whatever field they aspire to work in and... be paid equally, which were all goals of feminism. (Which you got, baby, thanks to men in power who voted it in because they recognized it was the right thing to do.) I am not a modern day feminist I dont think, but I do believe in equal rights for women, and I dont see how equal rights for women puts men at a disadvantage at all or is fascist. Fascism refers to when corporations and private interests govern a country. wtf?
S: You missed the boat again love.
FRIEND: i dont want ure f****n boat. ure…f****n stupid on this. (You heard her. Throw her off the boat!)
S: (my other friend) was only comparing feminism and fascism in a superficial way, read his comment again. My interest is not in the feminist movement of over a hundred years ago my interest is where we are at now. I am interested in developing my own.
WARCHICK Resa Laru Kirkland<~~~ Look up some of this *amazing goddesses* work if you can not wait till we speak. =) You more than likely wil not agree with a single thing she believes in, but read her "stuff" she has some good points. =)
"feel welcome to delete it w/out hurting my feewings. not that you really probably care about that."
What are you talking about? You are one of my favorites!♥ You think I try to argue with you and what not but I think we are debating...If we didn't piss each other off sometimes I wouldn't be able to claim so much homie ♥ for you...
Wtf I would hope that if someone disagreed with you on any given subject, that they wouldn't call you f*****g stupid- that's a cop-out...You *really* pissed me off with the comments you said over Memorial Day weekend but I didn't delete you from my friends like some other a*****s who just blew you off...If you wanna know what I think let's talk don't just blow me off it sucks and you are lots and lots more bunches of smart than that!!! =)
FRIEND: u just frustrate the f**k out of me when you tell me im not getting something. because i feel like you're not gettin it. get it?
S: Yeah but I'm not saying you don't "get it" you don't have all the information that I want you to know...
FRIEND: i looked at that chick and i would f****n spit on her f****n soul. She is the embodiment of everything i find evil and wrong in this f****n world. (Oh how I love fan mail!) and as we are all connected and i truly believe in the Buddhist proverb that says that every person is you, or in every person you should see yourself, or something like that., I would be willing to take the world down just to watch cockroaches like her go down. including myself, if any part of myself is her. (Again, you heard her!) whatever do you get my point? (Kumbayah, baby! Keep reading…it gets better…and by that I mean sadder.)
S: Lol ok, that's what I thought you'd say... Well, you probably look up a bit more than some of the Anti-feminist articles she wrote... looked* Like her views on immigration, and terrorists, ect... I told you she would oppose your views, but back to the original topic Feminism we will talk when I see you...
FRIEND: i just looked at more of her s**t. someone should f****n shoot her in the head and perform some sort of deep magick to make sure her soul does not continue on but instead gets snuffed out never to be a part of the universe again. :) im feeling creative right now. (“Come on people now, smile on your brother” Ya feel da love?) sorry for calling you stupid, but i didnt really call you stupid, (Then why did you apologize?) i said you were being stupid about that topic. (No, you called her stupid. See, with the left, they tell you what they did or didn’t JUST do and you MUST take their word for it, not think for yourself. You misunderstand their name calling and death threats; you can’t be trusted to properly interpret what they say or do.) i didnt even read any of this worm's views on feminism. (Ummm, you didn’t even read my views but let loose with a hellish vitriol that only a broad’s emoting can unleash? This level of mental illness that has infected the left is beyond comprehension.)
S: Yeah I know you hate her... I get it... (No, S, clearly you misunderstand her f*****g name-calling and death threats. Only the right hates.) How can you know I'm stupid on this topic and you don't even have my opinion? (Elitists just know, silly girl!)
FRIEND: i dont know anything, i just feel and trust my intuition. :) (See what she just said right here? Right here? THIS SUMS UP THE LEFT PERFECTLY! Like Schultz, they “know nut-ting!” Why do we listen to them? We should give them a bottle and make them take a nap. I’m not changing those diapers, though…they’re on their own).
S: Well if you don't know anything why do you want to have this convo? I dislike. You jumped my s**t over something you don't even know where I stand (Oh no, you misunderstand) ...you think you know where I stand... Or your intuition is that you know where I stand. (You’re misinformed.) Am I not going to college? (for a career of my own) Do I not vote?...Do I believe women should have all of these rights? The answer is yes, love.
FRIEND: if you dont want people, including me, to assume that you are enti-female rights, than dont join two groups that belittle females. (Or else!) you might have some explanation of your beliefs (Explain how you DARE believe contrary to me!) that go beyond a persons first conclusion on the topic, but i cant know that unless you tell me, so i started the convo hoping it was a joke, or that you were mis-informed (See?) on what an anti-feminist was. and just because I admit to not KNOWING anything, does not mean that I am not right, i am just open to the possibility that I am wrong. (When you figure out what the hell she’s trying to say here, email me, OK? ‘Cause WOW just seems inadequate.)
S: Well good then. =D If there is a possiblity I still can salvage this conversation, I will email you my paper I wrote on feminism and Resa's paper I wrote it on. The question is: are you willing to discuss this matter in a logical manner with me? ( Not a you're f*****g stupid on this way ) And don't get so mad, you are not a martyr for Feminism! I understand your passion but don't let that lovely passion of yours blind you for your love of me!!! =) (Beautifully spoken, S.) I am equally as passionate, but jeez girl don't get so mad. "Don't let anyone rent space in your head."
FRIEND: i said you 'might' be right about modern feminism, because besides upholding the rights that have already been earned, i am ignorant as to what they are up to. (Finally, something we really, really, REALLY agree on.) There's nothing fascist about feminism no matter what your opinions on fascism though. the only way i could think feminism could be called fascist is if we leave the corporate reference out of the definition of fascism, AND if feminists are trying to take over the country (If???) according to their values. maybe i need to be enlightened, (Maybe???) but i just havent noticed any feminist organizations with a strong voice in our government. i eagerly await the reading of your paper. :) (Apparently she’s been on Mars…in a cave…with her fingers in her ears…with the lights off…with no TV…no radio…no news…no brain activity. Kind of supports that whole Schultz theory, doesn’t it?)
S: …Despite my anger towards the evil human beings my hope and faith in humanity has been renewed, recently.
Two bright spots: Resa LuRu Kirkland and Michael Robert Eagen...♥
FRIEND: omg shannon i feel like i shouldnt be associated w/ you because you admire this women. she is scum! how could you? (Translation: You cannot handle your free will, hand it over to me!) i only care about it because i am so close to you. (I know better than you what’s best for you) otherwise i wouldnt give a f**k who you admired. i probably sound like a huge hypocrite, (PROBABLY???) but even though i feel like i shouldnt be associated with you we have tried to get away from each other numerous times and always come back so its worthless to think about it really. im stuck w/ you.
Well. That was exhausting…I mean seriously. And confusing. And outrageous. And deeply, deeply embedded in this generation of spoiled, ruined, decimated femininity.
And here to stay, if we let it. Because THAT is the way of communism; logic and reason need NOT apply.
Now here’s where hope comes into play. Look at S. Isn’t she magnificent? She stayed the course of logic and reason, not giving in to ad hominem, four-letter rages, death threats, admissions of mind-boggling refusal to even search and ponder by her “friend” that would have depleted the heartiest soul. She is reason enough to fight on, and not grow weary.
At least I don’t have to worry about FRIEND reading this. My articles don’t come in “feel.”
Keep the faith, bros, in all things courage, and no substitute for VICTORY.
My anti-femmie articles have always been my most popular. I have gotten emails from people all over the United States, Canada, Australia, India, Europe, and a few letters that may possibly be from other planets.
And no, I don’t mean that because the people who were writing them were wrong in their outrage. I mean because the behavior and beliefs they describe are so completely out of this world.
That’s feminism for you…ugly aliens and constantly a pain in the butt (anal probe joke).
It started with this sweet letter from a young woman (I’ll call her “S”), who had more courage at 20 than I have at 44:
I received an A on the paper I wrote on your article, "Women Should Reject Feminism."
I am just getting my feet wet in school, and liberal politics run rampant in my classrooms. I have to do quite a bit of dissecting and analyzing, not to get caught up in "their" BS.
I have been reading some of your "stuff"; I am very impressed with your strong, unforgiving viewpoints. You are very inspirational to me. Thanks.
~ S
Needless to say, I was overwhelmed that something I wrote had affected this young woman so profoundly, and I feel uncomfortable saying that out loud. Truth is what it is, and the credit goes there. I’m consistently stunned that people are consistently stunned by stating the truth out loud, as if we’re all in on some agreement not to do so in the name of politeness. Apparently we have forgotten that our obligation is to truth, not “feewings.” And here’s the evidence.
After responding to S, she shared with me a raging debate going on between her and a friend who had the same hippy views she was running into in the ironically named halls of “higher education.” Remarkably, and predictably, her friend is more educated than S is, yet far less capable of a rational thought or cogent response.
And it began with a woman who rejected an education system overrun with communism and started thinking and studying for herself. It is clear as she explains herself and the debate with her “friend” that one of them follows the textbook behavior of evil: distract, divert, evade, deny, lie, ad hominem, and wear them out without ever actually addressing the subject at hand.
Anything but the truth. By their fruits…
In her own words, they are NOT in need of any editing other than names for privacy’s sake and personal commentary. What you are about to read about S makes the debate that follows, between her and her “educated” friend, even more remarkable…and inspiring (my commentary in red):
Warchick,
F*****g A right you have permission! I am tickled to death!!! =D
Speaking to her is utterly exhausting! Talking to her on everything from immigration to supporting our soldiers is mind numbing! Over Memorial Day weekend, she made comments about our girls and boys in uniform that turned my stomach and literally made me want to be sick! She is so lost and confused and it’s not even that her viewpoints, opposing my own, that bothers me, it is her complete lack of knowledge and the fact that she is ignorant of how to discuss anything in a clear, concise, logical manner. If she at least possessed some better argumentation skills, I could respect her opinion. She spews emotion after reaction after emotion. No logic. No freaking brain. Not like I have to tell you… I believe the conversation is now over so I will send it to you. Do your worst! (Best) =) (She stated this so concisely and accurately that my commentary is unnecessary.)
It ended with her realizing that she held no quarter to…my logic. Alas, she can see *some* light and now I remember why I bother with this sweet, uninformed girl. The saddest part about the whole thing is she is far more educated than I. I am not ashamed to say (due to excruciating family circumstances) I am a ninth grade dropout! She has an associate in psychology, and on her way to a bachelor. It is so scary to me; even the most educated people of this country are some of the most ignorant. Her degree, I think she feels, gives her the right to be an idiot! What does your education mean to you?! Scary! I just finished my first two college classes, with good grades. =) I haven’t been to school in more than eight years. “Diamond in the rough.” =)…
I was scared to show you the conversation, because of possible legal backlash. (My friend defaming your name or using threatening language) I should have known better! You are a real person, and you are intelligent enough to know political correctness is for people with idle minds. =)
I was also very surprised you took an interest in me at all or even replied to me at all. It took me a while to think over and realize why you even took the time to respond to my messages. I realize now that people like my friend are as disgusted by you, as we are them. (Left vs. Right) I also realize you need (well not exactly) people like me to encourage you. You are completely “Right” (pun intended) and out on a limb (and our numbers are not as strong as they should be) anything I can say or do to encourage you in your work is an honor. =)
~S
P.S. You can leave the bit out about me being an eighth grade drop-out, in your article. Like I said; I am not ashamed, I feel it may disparage your own point. (Dark past, extremely bright future) =)
Look at her reasoning, her perception, her decency, in the above and below, and contrast that with her friend’s convoluted logic and behavior below. You want to know the difference between the left and right? Read! It’s long, tough to get through, and as S said, exhausting. But it’s too important to shorten, and the perfect commentary on the idiocy of feminism and all leftist thinking. (Lightly edited for language, but not spelling, grammar, or logic…obviously).
FRIEND: I tried to send this as a message, but something is glitching, so i have to post it here. if it makes you mad, feel welcome to delete it w/out hurting my feewings. not that you really probably care about that. k? k.
i think it is soo ignorant (meaning lack of information or knowledge on subject) of you to be anti-femini...st, thats just f*****g stupid. So you dont think we have the right to be paid fairly, to vote, to divorce our husbands, to not wear dresses every f****n day, to question the men in our lives, to hold jobs besides teachers, nurses, secretaries and nannies????? Feminists and feminists alone brought about all the changes that brought these sort of rights to us. (Exactly how many women were in power? Oh right, those were majority old white European males who enacted laws on vote, land ownership, etc. But in femmie-speak, women did it because…well, I guess ‘cause they say so.)
S: No love-love you don't know my views we've never discussed this one I absolutely want everythin you mention above, we will talk...Haha friend you funny you think I'm so ignorant, you broke down ignorant for me... =D (Ooooooh! That’s gonna leave a mark!)
FRIEND: you might be right about modern feminism, but with everything i know about feminism in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, you're just wrong. (What does that have to do with the 21st Century?) There is nothing unequal and fascist about women wanting to vote, or having the right to disagree with their husbands or divorce them, or work in whatever field they aspire to work in and... be paid equally, which were all goals of feminism. (Which you got, baby, thanks to men in power who voted it in because they recognized it was the right thing to do.) I am not a modern day feminist I dont think, but I do believe in equal rights for women, and I dont see how equal rights for women puts men at a disadvantage at all or is fascist. Fascism refers to when corporations and private interests govern a country. wtf?
S: You missed the boat again love.
FRIEND: i dont want ure f****n boat. ure…f****n stupid on this. (You heard her. Throw her off the boat!)
S: (my other friend) was only comparing feminism and fascism in a superficial way, read his comment again. My interest is not in the feminist movement of over a hundred years ago my interest is where we are at now. I am interested in developing my own.
WARCHICK Resa Laru Kirkland<~~~ Look up some of this *amazing goddesses* work if you can not wait till we speak. =) You more than likely wil not agree with a single thing she believes in, but read her "stuff" she has some good points. =)
"feel welcome to delete it w/out hurting my feewings. not that you really probably care about that."
What are you talking about? You are one of my favorites!♥ You think I try to argue with you and what not but I think we are debating...If we didn't piss each other off sometimes I wouldn't be able to claim so much homie ♥ for you...
Wtf I would hope that if someone disagreed with you on any given subject, that they wouldn't call you f*****g stupid- that's a cop-out...You *really* pissed me off with the comments you said over Memorial Day weekend but I didn't delete you from my friends like some other a*****s who just blew you off...If you wanna know what I think let's talk don't just blow me off it sucks and you are lots and lots more bunches of smart than that!!! =)
FRIEND: u just frustrate the f**k out of me when you tell me im not getting something. because i feel like you're not gettin it. get it?
S: Yeah but I'm not saying you don't "get it" you don't have all the information that I want you to know...
FRIEND: i looked at that chick and i would f****n spit on her f****n soul. She is the embodiment of everything i find evil and wrong in this f****n world. (Oh how I love fan mail!) and as we are all connected and i truly believe in the Buddhist proverb that says that every person is you, or in every person you should see yourself, or something like that., I would be willing to take the world down just to watch cockroaches like her go down. including myself, if any part of myself is her. (Again, you heard her!) whatever do you get my point? (Kumbayah, baby! Keep reading…it gets better…and by that I mean sadder.)
S: Lol ok, that's what I thought you'd say... Well, you probably look up a bit more than some of the Anti-feminist articles she wrote... looked* Like her views on immigration, and terrorists, ect... I told you she would oppose your views, but back to the original topic Feminism we will talk when I see you...
FRIEND: i just looked at more of her s**t. someone should f****n shoot her in the head and perform some sort of deep magick to make sure her soul does not continue on but instead gets snuffed out never to be a part of the universe again. :) im feeling creative right now. (“Come on people now, smile on your brother” Ya feel da love?) sorry for calling you stupid, but i didnt really call you stupid, (Then why did you apologize?) i said you were being stupid about that topic. (No, you called her stupid. See, with the left, they tell you what they did or didn’t JUST do and you MUST take their word for it, not think for yourself. You misunderstand their name calling and death threats; you can’t be trusted to properly interpret what they say or do.) i didnt even read any of this worm's views on feminism. (Ummm, you didn’t even read my views but let loose with a hellish vitriol that only a broad’s emoting can unleash? This level of mental illness that has infected the left is beyond comprehension.)
S: Yeah I know you hate her... I get it... (No, S, clearly you misunderstand her f*****g name-calling and death threats. Only the right hates.) How can you know I'm stupid on this topic and you don't even have my opinion? (Elitists just know, silly girl!)
FRIEND: i dont know anything, i just feel and trust my intuition. :) (See what she just said right here? Right here? THIS SUMS UP THE LEFT PERFECTLY! Like Schultz, they “know nut-ting!” Why do we listen to them? We should give them a bottle and make them take a nap. I’m not changing those diapers, though…they’re on their own).
S: Well if you don't know anything why do you want to have this convo? I dislike. You jumped my s**t over something you don't even know where I stand (Oh no, you misunderstand) ...you think you know where I stand... Or your intuition is that you know where I stand. (You’re misinformed.) Am I not going to college? (for a career of my own) Do I not vote?...Do I believe women should have all of these rights? The answer is yes, love.
FRIEND: if you dont want people, including me, to assume that you are enti-female rights, than dont join two groups that belittle females. (Or else!) you might have some explanation of your beliefs (Explain how you DARE believe contrary to me!) that go beyond a persons first conclusion on the topic, but i cant know that unless you tell me, so i started the convo hoping it was a joke, or that you were mis-informed (See?) on what an anti-feminist was. and just because I admit to not KNOWING anything, does not mean that I am not right, i am just open to the possibility that I am wrong. (When you figure out what the hell she’s trying to say here, email me, OK? ‘Cause WOW just seems inadequate.)
S: Well good then. =D If there is a possiblity I still can salvage this conversation, I will email you my paper I wrote on feminism and Resa's paper I wrote it on. The question is: are you willing to discuss this matter in a logical manner with me? ( Not a you're f*****g stupid on this way ) And don't get so mad, you are not a martyr for Feminism! I understand your passion but don't let that lovely passion of yours blind you for your love of me!!! =) (Beautifully spoken, S.) I am equally as passionate, but jeez girl don't get so mad. "Don't let anyone rent space in your head."
FRIEND: i said you 'might' be right about modern feminism, because besides upholding the rights that have already been earned, i am ignorant as to what they are up to. (Finally, something we really, really, REALLY agree on.) There's nothing fascist about feminism no matter what your opinions on fascism though. the only way i could think feminism could be called fascist is if we leave the corporate reference out of the definition of fascism, AND if feminists are trying to take over the country (If???) according to their values. maybe i need to be enlightened, (Maybe???) but i just havent noticed any feminist organizations with a strong voice in our government. i eagerly await the reading of your paper. :) (Apparently she’s been on Mars…in a cave…with her fingers in her ears…with the lights off…with no TV…no radio…no news…no brain activity. Kind of supports that whole Schultz theory, doesn’t it?)
S: …Despite my anger towards the evil human beings my hope and faith in humanity has been renewed, recently.
Two bright spots: Resa LuRu Kirkland and Michael Robert Eagen...♥
FRIEND: omg shannon i feel like i shouldnt be associated w/ you because you admire this women. she is scum! how could you? (Translation: You cannot handle your free will, hand it over to me!) i only care about it because i am so close to you. (I know better than you what’s best for you) otherwise i wouldnt give a f**k who you admired. i probably sound like a huge hypocrite, (PROBABLY???) but even though i feel like i shouldnt be associated with you we have tried to get away from each other numerous times and always come back so its worthless to think about it really. im stuck w/ you.
Well. That was exhausting…I mean seriously. And confusing. And outrageous. And deeply, deeply embedded in this generation of spoiled, ruined, decimated femininity.
And here to stay, if we let it. Because THAT is the way of communism; logic and reason need NOT apply.
Now here’s where hope comes into play. Look at S. Isn’t she magnificent? She stayed the course of logic and reason, not giving in to ad hominem, four-letter rages, death threats, admissions of mind-boggling refusal to even search and ponder by her “friend” that would have depleted the heartiest soul. She is reason enough to fight on, and not grow weary.
At least I don’t have to worry about FRIEND reading this. My articles don’t come in “feel.”
Keep the faith, bros, in all things courage, and no substitute for VICTORY.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)